Page URL: https://www.bionews.org.uk/page_95770

Surrogate refuses to give consent for parental order

7 November 2016
Appeared in BioNews 876

A surrogate has refused to give her consent for the parents of twins to become the children's legal parents, even though she and her husband are not seeking any active involvement in the children's upbringing.

The woman had acted as a surrogate for the married couple – who are the twins' biological parents – after they were introduced through a non-for-profit surrogacy organisation in the UK. After a short period getting to know each other, the surrogate was implanted with their embryos at a UK fertility clinic at the age of 51. The twins were born early in 2015 and spent some time in neonatal intensive care, but have since been raised by their biological parents and are described as 'thriving' in their care.

When the couple came to apply for a parental order, however, they met all the statutory requirements except one – consent from the surrogate, with whom the relationship had broken down. The surrogate explained that during the pregnancy the intended parents did not 'show sufficient concern' when doctors raised health concerns about the surrogate at the 12-week scan. After that point there was limited contact between the parties until the children's birth. The surrogate asked to stop receiving pictures of the children in early 2016.

Details of the case arose after Mrs Justice Theis in the Family Court adjourned the couple's application for a parental order needed to become the children's legal parents. Justice Theis explained that the surrogate, who cannot be named, had brought the application to a 'juddering halt' to the 'very great distress of the applicants'. She observed that the surrogate's refusal to give consent was due to her 'own feelings of injustice, rather than what is in the children's best interests'.

'The result [of the refusal] is that these children are left in a legal limbo, where, contrary to what was agreed by the parties at the time of the arrangement, the [surrogate and her husband] will remain their legal parents even though they are not biologically related to them and they expressly wish to play no part in the children's lives,' she said.
 
A parental order is needed to confer legal parenthood following surrogacy; it its absence the surrogate and her spouse are usually considered in law to be the child's parents. While the surrogate said she would not oppose an adoption order (which would also transfer parenthood to the intended parents), the court acknowledged that such an order would 'not reflect the reality [that] these children are the biological children of the applicants', Justice Theis said.

In the meantime, the children's parents have been given parental responsibility until the children are 18 years old to enable them to make decisions about healthcare, education and other important aspects of their upbringing. However, unless a parental order is granted, the surrogate and her husband will remain the children's legal parents for the duration of their lives. Justice Theis indicated that, even with an order denying the surrogate parental responsibility over the children, the question of who is recognised to be the legal parent remains an important aspect of their welfare.

'From the perspective of these children's lifelong emotional and psychological welfare, parental orders are the only orders that accurately and properly reflect the children's identity as surrogate-born children,' she said.

Justice Theis said that she hoped the surrogate will 'rediscover what led her to undertake such a selfless role and see the situation from the viewpoint of these young children'.

The parents sought an adjournment to give them some time to allow the surrogate to change her mind and also to wait for possible legal reform in this area, the judge said, noting that the Law Commission has already proposed to look into surrogacy (see also BioNews 831).

SOURCES & REFERENCES
AB (Surrogacy: Consent), Re [2016] EWHC 2643 (Fam)
Bailii.org |  25 October 2016
Children in 'legal limbo' after surrogate refuses to hand over parental status
BT News |  27 October 2016
Re AB (Surrogacy: Consent) [2016] EWHC 2643 (Fam)
Family Law Week |  16 September 2019
Surrogacy case comes to a ‘juddering halt’
Marilyn Stowe |  31 October 2016
RELATED ARTICLES FROM THE BIONEWS ARCHIVE
28 August 2018 - by Antony Starza-Allen 
A US woman who gave birth to her own child while acting as a surrogate for another couple is reportedly suing the surrogacy agency involved for damages...
19 March 2018 - by Dr Mary Yarwood 
A UK man and woman in a platonic marriage have been granted a joint parenting order for their child, born via surrogate...
23 October 2017 - by Dr Mary Yarwood 
A surrogate from Queensland, Australia has had her parental rights removed after a judge decided it was in the baby's best interests...
10 April 2017 - by Jen Willows 
A decision granting custody of a baby to a surrogate has been upheld by the Court of Appeal...
19 December 2016 - by Ryan Ross 
The government has welcomed a House of Lords debate on surrogacy law reform, promising to consider whether the statute needs to be updated...
23 May 2016 - by Daniel Malynn 
The wheels of reform in the area of surrogacy law are slowly getting in motion, a conference in London heard this month...
29 June 2015 - by Rebecca Carr 
Last month, in a judgment that was hailed as the first of its kind, High Court judge Ms Justice Russell ordered a mother to hand over her child to a gay couple...
11 May 2015 - by Ana Ilic 
A legal battle over the custody of a baby girl born through a disputed surrogacy arrangement has resulted in an order to remove the child from her mother and place her into the care of her father and his partner....
22 October 2012 - by Natalie Gamble 
Consent requirements for surrogacy were created in 1990 and sought to discourage surrogacy, to make it a perilous undertaking that few would brave. With more experience behind us, we now know that surrogacy is not something to be quite so afraid of...
8 October 2012 - by Ruth Retassie 
A male couple in the UK has been awarded legal parenthood over twins born through an Indian surrogacy arrangement without the consent of the mother....
HAVE YOUR SAY
Log in to add a Comment.

By posting a comment you agree to abide by the BioNews terms and conditions


Syndicate this story - click here to enquire about using this story.