Page URL: https://www.bionews.org.uk/page_94488

What are the best interests of the child in international surrogacy?

17 February 2014
By Professor Eric Blyth, Dr Marilyn Crawshaw and Professor Olga van den Akker
Eric Blyth is Professor of Social Work at the University of Huddersfield and corresponding member of PROGAR; Marilyn Crawshaw is Honorary Fellow at the University of York and Chair of PROGAR; Olga van den Akker is Professor of Health Psychology at Middlesex University and a member of PROGAR and SRIP
Appeared in BioNews 742

As the surrogacy industry grows, so too do calls from parts of the consumer lobby, fertility industry and others for a loosening of international and domestic restraints on surrogacy arrangements. A consequence of this is the potential marginalisation of the best interests of children. Last month a roundtable was convened by the Project Group on Assisted Reproduction (PROGAR) and funded by the Society for Reproductive and Infant Psychology (SRIP), to discuss this issue.

The meeting drew representatives from five government departments, and international and domestic social work and professional bodies, lawyers, academics and consumer groups were all represented, reflecting growing interest and concern both in the UK and internationally. Recently the European Union has commissioned a report into surrogacy arrangements in member states (1), International Social Services (2) declared international surrogacy as a particular focus of interest, and The Hague Conference on Private International Law (3) is currently deliberating whether to develop a Convention on international surrogacy, as for international adoption. Our own research has revealed considerable shortcomings with official UK data regarding international surrogacy arrangements, such that they are inadequate to build a profile of the parties involved (4-6).

The potential scale of international surrogacy in the UK became evident as the meeting was advised that more than 1,000 babies may be brought into the UK each year, thus confirming media reports (7). However the overwhelming majority of commissioning parents do not subsequently apply for a Parental Order for transfer of legal parentage. Consequently, many surrogate children may be raised by parents who carry either no or incomplete legal parental status.

Participants highlighted a range of actual and potential problems for surrogates, commissioning parents and children caused by the status quo, especially where surrogacy arrangements take place in jurisdictions that do not adhere to UK standards of care and/or where UK legal provisions regarding parentage and access to information about the surrogate do not apply and/or where surrogates are drawn from socio-economically disadvantaged communities.

The meeting provided an opportunity for at least tentative proposals for a way forward, including support for an International Convention on Surrogacy, along the lines under consideration by the Hague Conference on Private International Law. However, it was recognised that this was more of a long-term response and that bilateral agreements between individual countries willing to address the issues may be more feasible in the shorter-term.

Additionally, the international multi-disciplinary infertility community could be encouraged to develop and adopt codes of practice and basic minimum standards for health care professionals providing surrogacy services. Lessons from international adoption could be applied, such as enhancing staffing in UK embassies/consulates in countries which are known to be particularly problematic. Additionally, obtaining a Parental Order could be made a prerequisite before a passport is issued for the child.

In the UK, many surrogate children may be at risk through having insecure legal parentage. It was recognised that the reasons for this could include inadequate knowledge and the disincentives for applying for a Parental Order. For example, more standardised information for potential commissioning parents could be provided across the various government departments that have an involvement in international surrogacy. Parents who are responsible for the care of a young baby may also be deterred by the time-consuming and expensive process of obtaining a Parental Order (via the High Court in the case of an international surrogacy arrangement) and which some may think is unnecessary if they have already obtained a court order and/or birth certificate in the country of the child’s birth.

Remedying these problems was identified and considered a priority for action, requiring increased joined-up thinking and practice. In summary, much needs to be done to ensure that the best interests of children are prioritised in international surrogacy arrangements. This roundtable was one step along the way to achieving this.

RELATED ARTICLES FROM THE BIONEWS ARCHIVE
17 October 2016 - by Antony Starza-Allen 
The Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe, a human rights organisation, has voted to reject a proposal to introduce international guidelines on surrogacy and children's rights...
8 June 2015 - by Michael Wells-Greco 
On 21 May 2015 the Swiss Federal Court refused to register a male couple - who are in a civil partnership and living in Saint-Gallen, Switzerland - as the legal fathers of a child born following an inter-country surrogacy arrangement...
11 August 2014 - by Sascha Callaghan and Ainsley Newson 
The story of the baby with Down's syndrome 'abandoned' in Thailand, which has dominated the news, illustrates how the international surrogacy industry has been booming...
16 June 2014 - by Natalie Gamble 
Many future parents of children born via surrogacy risk never being able to enjoy the new rights to leave and pay promised in the Children and Families Act...
17 March 2014 - by Louisa Ghevaert 
A recent case made national headlines for being a 'do it yourself' surrogacy arrangement which ended in marital breakdown and legal chaos, but news reports did not fully address the complex issues raised in the case about the identity and best interests of the child...
16 December 2013 - by Daniel Malynn 
This event, hosted by the Bar Council, looked the options and potential pitfalls same-sex couples can face can face in accessing surrogacy both in the UK and overseas...
4 November 2013 - by Rebecca Carr 
A recent order from the Indian Ministry of Home Affairs has stipulated that foreign nationals seeking to enter India for the purposes of commissioning Indian surrogacy services must now apply for a medical visa to do so....
7 October 2013 - by Dr Kirsty Horsey 
I'm not sure how a television documentary manages to be saddening, heartwarming, uplifting and worrying all at the same time. BBC Four's House of Surrogates, which focused on one provider of paid-for surrogacy in India, where all the women acting as surrogates for one Gujarati clinic spent 'their pregnancy away from home in dorms', managed it...
29 July 2013 - by Ari Haque 
Indian surrogate mothers are frequently underpaid and insufficiently cared for, a report from an Indian charity claims. The Centre for Social Research in New Delhi says there is little protection for surrogates in a growing industry without an adequate legal framework...
HAVE YOUR SAY
Lack of international laws for IVF children and families (User:114695 - 03/03/2014)
We definitely need laws in this unregulated industry. In a stroke, it can change the life of an IVF parent whether to abandon an innocent IVF child OR live in exile and raise them giving up their entire career and life only because we do not have equal laws for IVF children and families. If there are international laws for adoption and abduction for children, why not international laws for IVF/surrogacy children? When will it be about the best interest of the child?
Log in to add a Comment.

By posting a comment you agree to abide by the BioNews terms and conditions


Syndicate this story - click here to enquire about using this story.