Page URL: https://www.bionews.org.uk/page_94158

High Court parenthood decision should drive compliance in clinics

10 June 2013
By Richard Perrins
Family solicitor at Natalie Gamble Associates
Appeared in BioNews 708

A UK judge recently declared that a lesbian non-birth mother is not a parent, because of the failure of a fertility clinic to comply with the Human Fertilisation and Embryology (HFE) Acts 1990 and 2008 (reported in the current edition of BioNews).

The judge found that the 'consent to legal parent' forms, which one of the parties downloaded from the Internet, crucially were not provided before treatment took place. The decision underlines the complexities of the law in this area and the careful attention needed by same-sex couples embarking on fertility treatment as well as their clinics.

The case involved a lesbian couple who had been in a relationship for 13 years. In 2008 - before the HFE Act 2008 came into force - the couple were planning to start a family together. By the time the biological mother conceived the twin boys, the law was in force.

When the couple separated, the non-birth mother issued an application for contact with the twins. The birth mother then challenged whether her former partner should be considered a parent.

The case was decided on its own specific set of circumstances, and centred round whether the couple involved had signed and submitted their consent forms prior to receiving treatment in May 2009. The rules providing parenthood by virtue of signing such forms had only come into force the month before. Justice Cobb concluded that the forms had not been submitted before treatment and therefore the non-biological mother could not be a parent due to non-compliance with Section 43 of the HFE Act 2008.

Taking this one step further, the judge also ruled that even if the forms had been submitted within the correct timeframe, they were in breach of the clinic's licence obligations. In particular, the clinic had failed to offer adequate counselling to the parties before treatment; they had not provided sufficient information to enable the couple to make informed consent on the issue of parentage; and the records on consent form delivery and treatment were inadequate.

Furthermore, Mr Justice Cobb scrutinised the issue of whether there was 'informed consent'. He was keen to stress that the guidance is clear, and the emphasis is on clinics to provide detailed information to patients on the treatment they are receiving and the potential implications involved.

The wider implications of the decision for patients and clinics alike remain to be seen but it's worth noting that the non-birth mother's case is not over. There is to be a further hearing to determine whether she should be able to apply for contact in the wake of his decision.

Mr Justice Cobb emphasised that whilst his strict interpretation of the statutory provisions has determined that she is not the legal parent, this 'is not the end of the story'. He points out that 'a parental relationship can take many forms, not just dependent upon biological or legal links; psychological and social parenthood, is, or can be, meaningful for children'.

The decision will serve as an important reminder for fertility clinics to ensure that when treating patients in similar situations, their procedures are fully compliant with the statutory criteria as set out in the HFE Act 2008. For couples who have undergone or are considering treatment, this case highlights how there can often be considerable heartache if the relationship breaks down, with parties trying to assert a higher status over the other in order to try and exclude them.

SOURCES & REFERENCES
E & F (Assisted Reproduction: Parent) [2013] EWHC 1418 (Fam)
Family Law Week |  24 June 2013
RELATED ARTICLES FROM THE BIONEWS ARCHIVE
14 September 2015 - by Antony Blackburn-Starza 
The President of the Family Division, Sir James Munby, has spoken of 'widespread incompetence' in the fertility sector and has questioned the adequacy of the regulatory framework overseen by the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority...
23 March 2015 - by Marisa Allman 
The recent case of X v Y v CRM highlights the potential legal difficulties for children born via assisted conception of clinic error. A recent audit by the HFEA discovered that 50 out of 75 clinics nationwide reported anomalies in respect of the signing or keeping of forms for legal parenthood...
1 July 2013 - by Marisa Allman 
It is a licence condition for all UK fertility clinics that treatment using embryos or donated gametes shall not be provided unless the woman being treated, and any man or woman being treated with her, have been given a suitable opportunity to receive proper counselling and have been provided with relevant information...
10 June 2013 - by Dr James Heather 
The Irish Government is to appeal a recent court ruling that allowed the genetic mother of twins born to a surrogate to be listed as their legal mother on their birth certificates...
10 June 2013 - by Antony Blackburn-Starza 
A woman has been removed as the legal parent of twins born following fertility treatment with her former partner, who is the children's genetic mother, after the clinic failed to obtain adequate consent....
8 October 2012 - by Ruth Retassie 
A male couple in the UK has been awarded legal parenthood over twins born through an Indian surrogacy arrangement without the consent of the mother....
24 September 2012 - by Tom Barrow 
The High Court has awarded a lesbian couple sole custody rights for a child conceived using donor sperm and a surrogate's egg after a three-year battle over parenthood...
HAVE YOUR SAY
Log in to add a Comment.

By posting a comment you agree to abide by the BioNews terms and conditions


Syndicate this story - click here to enquire about using this story.