Page URL: https://www.bionews.org.uk/page_93962

Donor conception in the UK: the seldom-heard voices of minority ethnic communities

21 January 2013
By Nicky Hudson and Lorraine Culley
Nicky Hudson, senior research fellow at the School of Applied Social Sciences, De Montfort University. Lorraine Culley, professor of social science and health at the School of Applied Social Sciences, De Montfort University
Appeared in BioNews 689

When we set out over ten years ago to carry out research about infertility within British South Asian communities (1-3), little was known about how involuntary childlessness and its possible resolution with assisted conception was experienced by members of minority ethnic communities in the UK. Despite some improvements in the evidence, much of what we know about infertility is still based on the experiences of mostly white, middle class couples.

Whilst rates of voluntary childlessness may have increased in the general population, British South Asian communities remain, in general, strongly pro-natalist and most married adults will be expected to have children. Infertility remains highly stigmatised, with potentially highly negative social consequences, for women in particular.

The use of IVF is largely accepted within South Asian communities, but many people in our research (4) considered the use of third party assisted conception to be a highly risky endeavour. The use of reproductive material from outside the marital relationship was seen to transgress legitimate family and kinship boundaries and presented a particular threat (in the case of sperm donation) to culturally and religiously sanctioned understandings of patrilineal continuity.

Donor conception is therefore considered to be a treatment of last resort, the use of which would not be disclosed to others. As is still the case in many contexts, donor conception is perceived as unusual, controversial and for some, fraught with ethical dilemmas. However within South Asian communities, donor conception was seen to carry the potential for negative social consequences: gossip, stigma, social ostracism, and in some cases, implications for the marriage prospects of donor-conceived individuals.

This is not to say that South Asian couples do not use donor gametes in order to conceive a much-longed for child: we talked to people who were doing so in spite of wider social mores and we know that there is a demand for donor gametes from minority ethnic donors, which continues to outstrip supply (5). As a result of donor shortages, couples are often encouraged to bring 'known' donors, join long waiting lists, or for some, to seek treatment in another country; the implications of which are rarely acknowledged.

For all couples who explore the use of donor gametes, a complex set of decisions awaits. For couples from South Asian communities, this is often compounded by the knowledge that their treatment choices may be socially and/or religiously contentious. Decisions about donor choice, donor 'matching' and disclosure become highly significant in such a context. Few couples we spoke to had shared information about their use of IVF widely, and many hadn't told anyone. For those using donor eggs or donor sperm, the close management of information was critical.

Current debates about practices surrounding donor conception may therefore have different meanings and consequences within minority communities. Policy decisions may not map neatly onto the moral frameworks in operation in all sections of society. Disclosure decisions, for example, need to be viewed not just as relating to potential parents, their future children and the donor, but as having wider and ongoing implications in communities where infertility is not considered solely the province of the individual or nuclear family.

The impact of infertility and its resolution with treatments like IVF can be devastating, regardless of ethnicity. However, for some, the social and cultural context in which that experience takes places brings a different range of dilemmas and decisions. Those delivering services and consulting the public need to be aware of these important differences. The ethnocentric manner in which these dilemmas are often constructed in public and academic debates marginalises the concerns and needs of some minority ethnic communities, who, as relatively disadvantaged groups, may be denied access to treatment for reasons of economic cost and/or denied effective access to some options due to a shortage of gametes.

Such silences are not acceptable and increased efforts must be made to include diverse voices in public debates, consultations and research on reproductive technologies. Sadly, ten years on from the beginning of our work, there is little sign of progress in this regard.

SOURCES & REFERENCES
1) British South Asian communities and infertility services
Human Fertility |  24 April 2018
2) Public Perceptions of Gamete Donation in British South Asian Communities
Economic and Social Research Council |  24 April 2018
3) Infertility in British South Asian Communities: Negotiating the Community and the Clinic
De Montfort University |  24 April 2018
4) 2011 Census: Key Statistics for England and Wales, March 2011
Office for National Statistics |  11 December 2012
Donating sperm and eggs. Have your say...
Human Fertilisation & Embryology Authority |  24 April 2018
RELATED ARTICLES FROM THE BIONEWS ARCHIVE
28 January 2013 - by Cait McDonagh 
The second debate in the Progress Educational Trust's project 'When It Takes More Than Two' took place at University College London last week. The debate, 'Receiving: The Recipient Parent Perspective', focused on the views of those who have received donor gametes to begin their families....
7 January 2013 - by Ruth Saunders 
Progress Educational Trust's 2012 annual conference 'Fertility Treatment: A Life-Changing Event?' concluded with a session entitled 'The Age-Old Question: The Impact of Age'...
10 December 2012 - by Ari Haque 
A couple who was refused fertility treatment on the NHS for being 'too old' has said it intends to challenge the decision in the courts, arguing that the decision amounts to age discrimination....
29 October 2012 - by Dr Mary Yarwood 
A convicted sex offender and his partner have been denied access to IVF treatment by the Victoria Court of Appeal in Australia, pending a re-hearing by a lower court....
1 October 2012 - by Jessica Ware 
NHS Fife will no longer provide fertility treatment to couples if either of them smokes, or if the woman is overweight. In the same week, the Scottish Government has pledged to invest £12 million over the next three years to reduce waiting times for infertility treatment across Scotland...
3 September 2012 - by Clare Lewis-Jones MBE 
Last summer the National Infertility Awareness Campaign (NIAC) launched its most comprehensive patient survey to date. The aim of the survey was to identify problems faced by people seeking NHS-funded fertility treatment...
HAVE YOUR SAY
Log in to add a Comment.

By posting a comment you agree to abide by the BioNews terms and conditions


Syndicate this story - click here to enquire about using this story.