Page URL:

Legal challenge mounted to Oklahoma 'personhood' amendment

2 April 2012
Appeared in BioNews 651

Civil liberty groups in the USA have filed a legal challenge to the 'personhood' ballot initiative in Oklahoma, as a separate measure known as the Personhood Act progresses through the State legislature.

The Centre for Reproductive Rights (CRR) has filed a lawsuit at the Oklahoma Supreme Court to prevent a public vote on whether the constitution should be amended to define a fertilised egg as a 'person'.

The CRR, the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), and various local partners claim that the amendment would be unconstitutional as it infringes a woman's right to make decisions about abortion under the federal Constitution.

The pro-life ballot initiative was filed on 1 March by a group called Personhood Oklahoma, a state division of Personhood USA, which has until the end of May to collect the 155,000 signatures required to place the initiative on the ballot box in November.

The petition aims to amend Oklahoma's state constitution to define a person as 'any human being from the beginning of biological development'. The state attorney clarified this to mean the point of fertilisation, which he defined as the 'fusion of a female egg with a human male sperm to form a new cell'.

Opponents have raised concerns that the amendment could lead to a banning of abortion under all circumstances, including in cases of rape and incest or when a woman's life or health is at risk, as well as a ban on most forms of hormonal birth control such as IUDs (intrauterine devices) on the grounds that such procedures prevent implantation.

They also raised concerns that the amendment has the potential to impact a wide range of medical care and research, including treatment of ectopic pregnancy, IVF, stem cell research, and medical treatment for pregnant women.

Personhood USA president Keith Manson said: 'The opponents of personhood will stop at nothing to deny the people of Oklahoma their First Amendment right to petition the government on behalf of the preborn and ultimately recognise the most basic and fundamental human rights of the smallest and most defenceless people group'.

Meanwhile, the Personhood Act, a legislative measure to extend the definition of 'person' under State law to include a fetus from the point of conception, has passed the House Public Health Committee by seven votes to four. It will now proceed to a vote by the full House, having already been passed by the Senate in February.

A series of personhood amendments to state constitutions have failed in recent months, as reported in BioNews 646. However, last Thursday, the Ohio Supreme Court dismissed a suit filed by Healthy Families Ohio challenging Personhood Ohio's petition effort. Healthy Families Ohio argued that the ballot title, describing the effects of the amendment, was not a 'fair and truthful' description of the measure.

The lawsuit in Oklahoma was filed one day after a judge struck down a state law requiring women seeking abortions to be shown an ultrasound image and to listen to a detailed description of the fetus before the procedure.

Bill Information for SB 1433
Oklahoma State Legislature |  28 November 2021
Center for Reproductive Rights Launches Legal Challenge to Keep Abortion and Contraception Ban Off Oklahoma Ballot
Center for Reproductive Rights (press release) |  29 March 2012
Judge says Oklahoma cannot force abortion patients to view ultrasound
Guardian |  29 March 2012
Lawsuit filed against 'personhood' amendment
Tulsa World |  30 March 2012
Opponents File Suit Challenging Personhood Oklahoma’s Pro-life Amendment Petition
Personhood USA (press release) |  29 March 2012
Suit filed over Oklahoma personhood ballot measure
KRMG |  30 March 2012
3 September 2012 - by Dr Kimberley Bryon-Dodd 
A proposal to extend the definition of human life to 'all human beings at any stage of development' has failed to gain enough support to be put to a public vote in Colorado, USA...
8 May 2012 - by Dr Victoria Burchell 
The Oklahoma Supreme Court has declared void a ballot initiative that would have asked voters to expand the definition of a person in the state constitution to include human embryos and fetuses....
27 February 2012 - by Rosie Beauchamp 
The Republican controlled state Senate of Oklahoma passed the 'Personhood Act' by 34 votes to eight on 15 February. The Act moves to extend the definition of 'person' under State law to include a fetus from the point of conception...
21 November 2011 - by Dr Morven Shearer 
On 8 November the Mississippi electorate voted against an amendment to the Bill of Rights in their state Constitution which would have redefined life as beginning at the moment of fertilisation – the so-called 'personhood amendment' (Proposition 26)...
14 November 2011 - by Rachel Lloyd 
Voters in the US state of Mississippi have voted against a proposed constitutional amendment that would have defined life as beginning at fertilisation. The proposed amendment would have afforded embryos and fetuses – whether conceived naturally or artificially - similar legal protection as that covering all US citizens but was rejected by over 55 per cent of voters on 8 November...
3 October 2011 - by MacKenna Roberts 
On 8 September 2011 the Anscombe Bioethics Centre (a Roman Catholic organisation named after the philosopher Elizabeth Anscombe) organised the conference 'Human Embryo Research: Law, Ethics and Public Policy'. This was topical, in a month when it was announced that Europe's first clinical trials using human embryonic stem cells to treat Stargardt's macular degeneration (an incurable disease causing blindness in youth) would take place in the UK...
to add a Comment.

By posting a comment you agree to abide by the BioNews terms and conditions

Syndicate this story - click here to enquire about using this story.