Page URL: https://www.bionews.org.uk/page_93298

South African court sets out guidelines for surrogacy arrangements

14 November 2011
Appeared in BioNews 633

A High Court in South Africa has set out guidelines for judicial approaches to surrogacy arrangements in light of new family law legislation, which came into force last year.

The case concerned an application for confirmation of a surrogacy arrangement brought by the commissioning parents – Dutch and Danish citizens – but domiciled in South Africa. They were introduced to a surrogate by an agency known as Baby-2-Mom - an online egg donation agency that had operated since 2007 – which confirmed no funds had exchanged hands. It is understood the surrogate's gametes will not be used.

In granting the application, Judge Lotter Wepener in the North Gauteng High Court in Pretoria also invited the Pretoria Bar, the Law Society and the Centre for Child Law to make submissions on the correct approach in a number of scenarios. This included where the genetic material used is not that of the parties involved, where same-sex couples apply for a surrogacy agreement, and what factors should the courts consider in determining the 'best interests' of the child.

On same-sex surrogacy arrangements, the court said care should be taken that different tests are not applied which could be discriminatory. For example, it said some cases had required same-sex couples to demonstrate a 'maternal influence'. 'The mothering of the child is a function that very often does not have anything to do with the gender of a parent', the judge explained. The court also confirmed the child's best interests are of 'paramount importance in every matter concerning the child' both under the South African constitution and the new laws.

In determining 'suitable persons' to accept parenthood under the new laws, the court said: 'The individual idiosyncrasies of judicial officers should not determine the matter nor should the dominant prevailing view in society be necessarily decisive of the matter. One person's idea of a suitable parent may vary significantly from that of the next person'. Factors the courts should look at when asked to confirm a surrogacy arrangement under the new laws include the ability of the parents to care for the child emotionally and financially, and to 'provide an environment for the harmonious growth and development of the child'.

The court expressed concerns that the 'involvement of agencies in the introduction of surrogate mothers can also easily lead to abuse'. It said with regard to international surrogacy practices, 'it becomes clear particularly in countries such as ours with deep socio-economic disparities and the prevalence of poverty, that the possibility of abuse of underprivileged women is a real and ever present danger'. 'Ideally the involvement of agencies should be the subject of regulation', said the judge.

South Africa's provisions on surrogacy arrangements under the Children's Act 2005 came into force in April 2010. 'The legal implications of this relatively new development in our law could be rather complex and could have far reaching consequences for everyone involved', said the court. 'The Act provides in broad terms for the legal requirements attendant upon entering such agreements as well as requiring the confirmation of the High Court to render such agreements valid', it said.

In South Africa, altruistic surrogacy arrangements are only enforceable subject to confirmation by the High Court. Judge Wepener explained: 'It is a contract of a special kind, unique if regard is being had to its subject matter'. The formal requirements of a valid surrogate agreement are set out under the Act and include the requirement that at least one of the commissioning parents party to the agreement is domiciled in South Africa.

'If you are a French person or a foreigner here only for six months, it is not going to work, unless you live in South Africa for an indefinite period', explained Anthony William, the lawyer for the couple, as quoted by the South African Press Association. 'This judgment is important because it sets the parameters and the guidelines'.

Commercial surrogacy arrangements are not enforceable under South African law and surrogates may only claim pregnancy-related expenses.

SOURCES & REFERENCES
Ex parte: WH and Others (29936/11) [2011] ZAGPPHC 185
SAFLII |  27 September 2011
SA tightens rules for foreigners to make families
Times Live |  13 October 2011
RELATED ARTICLES FROM THE BIONEWS ARCHIVE
30 August 2016 - by Antony Starza-Allen 
A same-sex male couple in South Africa has become the first set of parents in the country to have triplets who share both the fathers' DNA...
16 September 2013 - by Louisa Ghevaert 
Two recent surrogacy disputes have emerged from Wisconsin, in the United States, and South Africa which highlight the challenging legal and practical issues surrogacy can create....
5 March 2012 - by Daniel Malynn 
Hosted by 7 Bedford Row chambers, this intellectually stimulating event highlighted the uncertainty and lack of consensus around surrogacy law. However, such was the emphasis on surrogacy the event title was never formally answered. Yet I nevertheless came away with the feeling that some key issues in surrogacy, applicable to the wider agenda of assisted reproduction, were thoroughly explored. Moreover, it established some momentum to press for law reform in the area....
9 January 2012 - by Annabel Christie 
A new surrogacy law in South Africa suggests a way to improve those in the UK – by making surrogacy agreements enforceable. In the UK, commissioning parents can only find out after the child is born if they can become the legal parents...
12 December 2011 - by Antony Starza-Allen 
The UK's High Court has granted parental orders to a couple over two children born through an international surrogacy arrangement, ruling that payments made to the Indian surrogates were not 'disproportionate'...
18 April 2011 - by Nisha Satkunarajah 
France's highest court has denied French citizenship to 10-year-old twins born to a French couple using a surrogate in the USA, reaffirming the country's ban on surrogacy...
7 February 2011 - by Ben Jones 
An Australian gay couple who entered into a paid surrogacy arrangement has won a legal battle to acquire full paternity rights for the non-genetic father....
7 February 2011 - by Nishat Hyder 
The Indian Parliament is debating new surrogacy laws to establish a clear regulatory framework to reduce exploitation in its commercial surrogacy market. If passed in its current form, India will recognise surrogacy agreements as legally binding....
31 January 2011 - by Antony Starza-Allen 
A UK surrogate who changed her mind about handing over a baby to a couple has been allowed to keep the child, the High Court has ruled....
22 March 2010 - by Dr Zeynep Gurtin 
Earlier this month, the Turkish Ministry of Health revised its regulations pertaining to assisted reproduction technologies (ARTs). The new regulatory structure considerably extends the specifications and requirements for the practice of ARTs in Turkey, and introduces a range of additional prohibitions. Two new developments are particularly striking. The first stipulates that all women in their first cycle of IVF can only have a single embryo transferred, with a maximum of two embryos for wom...
HAVE YOUR SAY
Log in to add a Comment.

By posting a comment you agree to abide by the BioNews terms and conditions


Syndicate this story - click here to enquire about using this story.