The Ethics of Consent and Choice in Prenatal Screening
Published by Cambridge Scholars
ISBN-10: 1443826480, ISBN-13: 978-1443826488
Buy this book from Amazon UK
In this ambitious text, Eleanor Milligan peels back the ethical layers surrounding prenatal screening. She reveals a world in which women choosing if they should undergo prenatal screening are heavily influenced by social considerations and often demonstrate a lack of understanding about the technique. By exploring the many ethical factors which influence a woman's decision to undergo prenatal screening, Milligan highlights how many women who partake do so without truly giving their informed consent.
This book is important for future parents as it reveals some surprising statistics surrounding prenatal testing. It is also important for a wider audience as it questions how we view humanity and highlights our dangerous obsession with human perfection.
Although it is generally considered good ethical (and legal) practice to obtain informed consent before undergoing any type of medical intervention, Milligan questions whether ˈinformed consentˈ actually empowers patients to make the 'right' decision for themselves - or is it just a procedural exercise to satisfy the lawyers? Milligan discusses studies which have shown that women participating in prenatal screening often find it difficult to articulate its implications. Furthermore, women may feel compelled to submit to prenatal screening by the healthcare system itself.
Milligan argues the 'routinisation' of medical care often presumes active female participation and gives various examples of this written in the first person narrative. (This also allows the reader to gain a deeper insight into the woman's decision-making process). She therefore suggests that very often the consent a woman provides is - by default - not adequately informed, and the current system may on occasions undermine a woman's autonomy.
Milligan also considers the influence of social factors on women deciding whether to undergo prenatal screening. Should a mother take into account the impact of a disabled child on her family or society at large, for example? The negative perception of disability is considered as a choice limiting factor with regards to prenatal screening and such factors further undermine her ability to make an autonomous decision.
Such perceptions could make women feel compelled to accept prenatal screening, and without being acutely sensitive to the issue, healthcare staff could unwittingly encourage women into agreeing to it because of this 'fear' of human disability.
Milligan advocates 'patient education' as a crucial factor in the decision-making process to help ensure informed consent. Even with today's ease of access to information on the internet and an increasing tendency of people to actively seek information, she highlights how patient education in the clinical setting is still lacking.
The conclusion was clear - Milligan recommends a more patient-centred model for prenatal screening. It was, however, disappointing to not have seen more of the potential father's point of view. Aren't men also involved in the decision-making process?
Buy The Ethics of Consent and Choice in Prenatal Screening from Amazon UK.