Save 20% on your next Cambridge Bioethics and Law online purchase
Page URL: https://www.bionews.org.uk/page_92812

House of Lords debates HFEA

7 February 2011
Appeared in BioNews 594

The Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority (HFEA) was once again the topic of a debate in the House of Lords on 1 February 2011. Following the proposed abolition of the HFEA and the Human Tissue Authority (HTA), Baroness Glenys Thornton asked how the UK government will maintain public confidence and patient safety.

Baroness Thornton drew attention to that 'UK legislation on these matters is the envy and the blueprint for the world' and that more than 200 hours were spent scrutinising and debating the legislation that established the HFEA'. She said 'the public have learnt to trust the HFEA and, indeed, the HTA' and raised concerns regarding who would take on the role as 'a bulwark between the sensational headlines in the less responsible press and those who are working in the field' if either of these bodies were abolished, and questioned whether the Care Quality Commission (CQC) was suitable.

'I am not opposed to change and improvement and I am not opposed to these proposals for the sake of it. I support change to make organisations more effective…by changing regulatory functions or by testingto see whether functions could be performed more effectively elsewhere', said Baroness Thornton.

She added: 'I suggest that public confidence in this area is best established through the independence of the bodies that regulate - the HTA and the HFEA - and that the Government need to rethink their proposals'.

Baroness Thornton's concerns about how the ethical and safeguarding functions might satisfactorily be carried out if HFEA and HTA were abolished were echoed by several peers. Lord Willis of Knaresborough explained: 'it is the lack of clarity over what is proposed, the lack of any consultation on the proposals, and in particular the lack of any public involvement in these proposals that makes me concerned about the future functions of both the HTA and the HFEA'.

Baroness Ruth Deech, former chair of the HFEA, said that placing the regulation with the CQC is 'misguided' and there will be 'no improvement in public confidence'. She said the public will not be persuaded that embryos will be treated with respect and 'there will be bounds on embryo research if it is handed over to unknowns and not the accountable and expert figures of the HFEA'.

On the other hand, Lord Robert Winston felt it was rather 'delightful' to support the Minister and the government's position. He stated that the Human Fertilisation and Embryology (HFE) Act was 'at the time an essential piece of legislation, which has now passed its day' and was 'no longer necessary'. 'The research that it regulates is not really suitable for regulation by the HFEA', he said.

In response to the debate, the Health Minister Earl Frederick Howe said a public consultation on the reallocation will take place over the summer. He said the plans 'do not represent any threat to patient safety, nor to the safeguards held within the legislative framework of provisions within the HFE Act and the Human Tissue Act'. Instead, he said, it is about 'streamlining the functions of the regulatory bodies concerned'.

'The burden of bureaucracy will be lessened overall for the NHS and other organisations', he explained.

SOURCES & REFERENCES
House of Lords HFEA / HTA question - Baroness Thornton
Lords Hansard |  1 February 2011
Progress Educational Trust (PET)
This week at PET |  4 February 2011
Response - Lord Howe
Lords Hansard |  1 February 2011
Response - Lord Willis
Lords Hansard |  1 February 2011
RELATED ARTICLES FROM THE BIONEWS ARCHIVE
13 August 2012 - by Antony Starza-Allen 
The UK's regulatory body on the use and storage of human tissue has outlined its position in support of its continued existence amid the Government's review of arm's length bodies...
2 April 2012 - by Dr Tamara Hirsch 
A recent report claims England's regulator of health and social care, the Care Quality Commission (CQC), is not at present ready to take on the functions of the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority (HFEA)...
19 December 2011 - by Sandy Starr 
The Public Bodies Bill - which empowers the UK Government to transfer the functions of the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority (HFEA), the country's regulator of fertility treatment and embryo research - has received Royal Assent and has become the Public Bodies Act. This Act represents the realisation in statute of the Coalition Government's longstanding plans for a 'bonfire of the quangos'...
12 December 2011 - by Oliver Timmis 
The Care Quality Commission (CQC) will take over policing of IVF clinics, despite worries it cannot cope with the additional workload...
16 May 2011 - by Julianna Photopoulos 
The UK's House of Lords has voted for the first time on an amendment that, if passed, would have impeded the Government's power to abolish its fertility regulator. The amendment to the Public Bodies Bill, which said the cost-effectiveness of the Conservative-Lib Dem Government's abolition plans must be assessed first, was narrowly defeated...
24 January 2011 - by Sarah Pritchard 
'We trained hard, but it seemed that every time we began to form into teams we were reorganised. I was to learn later in life that we tend to meet any new situation by reorganising. And a wonderful method it can be for creating the illusion of progress while producing confusion, inefficiency and demoralisation' - quoted by Professor Robin Lovell-Badge. The Progress Educational Trust and Anne Mclaren Memorial Fund organised a debate last week...
22 November 2010 - by Dr Vivienne Raper 
A former patron of the Progress Educational Trust (PET), which publishes BioNews, has been appointed to the UK's House of Lords. Former Member of Parliament (MP) Dafydd Wigley campaigned for the first Human Fertilisation and Embryology (HFE) Act in 1990...
22 November 2010 - by Ben Jones 
The proposed abolition of the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority (HFEA) was discussed for a second time in the House of Lords on 9 November 2010. Several peers drew attention to the questionable benefits of dismantling the fertility regulator...
18 October 2010 - by Matthew Smart 
Former members of the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority (HFEA) have spoken against proposals to axe the UK’s fertility watchdog...
13 September 2010 - by Professor David Jones 
In the early 1980s many people both inside and outside Parliament were seeking to prohibit experimentation on human embryos. In response, the government convened a committee of enquiry, aiming by that means to circumvent the possibility of a ban. The Warnock Report duly concluded that 'the embryo of the human species should be afforded some protection in law'. The committee was in favour of research involving the destruction of human embryos but...
HAVE YOUR SAY
Log in to add a Comment.

By posting a comment you agree to abide by the BioNews terms and conditions


Syndicate this story - click here to enquire about using this story.