Page URL:

Sperm-making gene is old, say experts

19 July 2010
Appeared in BioNews 567

A gene crucial for sperm production in humans is also needed to make sperm in many other animals including mice, sea urchins, flies and worms, scientists in Chicago, US, have discovered.

The research team took sperm from representative species of each of the major groups of animals and each time they were able to confirm the presence of the human gene called Boule. When they deleted this gene in mice, they found that the mice were healthy apart from an inability to produce sperm.

The finding came as a great surprise; genes related to sexual reproduction are under strong selective pressure and as a result, usually change rapidly through natural selection. The discovery suggests Boule is so essential for sperm production that it has been maintained throughout evolution. Professor Eugene Xu, the senior author of the paper, originally discovered Boule in 2001 and believes it is likely to be the oldest human sperm-specific gene ever discovered.

Just like the insect wing and bird wing evolved independently from each other, prior to this discovery it was not known whether the same was true for the ability to produce sperm.

'This finding suggests that all animal sperm production likely comes from a common prototype', said Professor Xu. 'This is the first clear evidence that suggests our ability to produce sperm is very ancient, probably originating at the dawn of animal evolution 600 million years ago'.

Discovery of this common gene involved in sperm production could have many practical uses for human health. 'A sperm-specific gene like Boule is an ideal target for a male contraceptive drug', said Professor Xu.

The discovery also offers a better understanding of male infertility and opens up a new research window for the future development of pesticides and medicines against infectious parasites. 'We now have one strong candidate to target for controlling their breeding', Professor Xu said. 'Our work suggests that disrupting the function of Boule in animals most likely will disrupt their breeding and put the threatening parasites or germs under control'.

The work by Professor Xu and his colleagues from Northwestern University will be published on July 15th in PLoS Genetics.

Scientists discover human sperm gene is 600 million years old
e! Science News |  15 July 2010
Scientists discover human sperm gene is 600 million years old |  15 July 2010
Sperm-making gene 600 million years old
CBC News |  15 July 2010
Widespread Presence of Human BOULE Homologs among Animals and Conservation of Their Ancient Reproductive Function
PloS Genetics |  15 July 2010
29 July 2013 - by Clara Salice 
The 'female' X chromosome has been shown to contain several genes that may be involved in sperm production...
15 October 2012 - by Chris Baldacci 
A gene mutation has been associated with sperm motility and production, offering new insights into male infertility....
14 March 2011 - by Leo Perfect 
Scientists from Stanford University, California, have compared human and chimpanzee genomes, revealing intriguing differences that may underlie the evolution of our species....
4 October 2010 - by Owen Clark 
A study has shown that mutations in the NR5A1 gene may be responsible for many unexplained cases of male infertility....
7 December 2009 - by Dr Vivienne Raper 
Mutations in sperm used for in vitro fertilization (IVF) and intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) may be responsible for causing the rare genetic disorders associated with these techniques...
29 June 2009 - by Dr Alan Thornhill 
Long before the current commercial banking crisis, the UK suffered another banking crisis - that of donor sperm shortages. The difference is that the sperm bank crisis is not global. Instead it is quintessentially British - full of principle and good intention but sadly resulting from compromise and inconsistency. Only the areas of inconsistency are consistent: the removal of anonymity, donor expenses, screening and selection guidelines and the limitations on use of individual donors. Taken s...
22 June 2009 - by Professor John Milbank 
Should donators of sperm remain anonymous? Some people say yes, others say no. But most assume that the argument is in principle resolvable if we can apply the right principles in relation to accurate evidence....
to add a Comment.

By posting a comment you agree to abide by the BioNews terms and conditions

Syndicate this story - click here to enquire about using this story.