Page URL:

Longevity gene study results ‘flawed’, say experts

12 July 2010
Appeared in BioNews 566

Last week, BioNews reported on a study published in Science that claimed to have identified several gene clusters associated with longevity. The study drew significant media interest but, following the paper's publication, experts have raised concerns about the data.

Commenting in Newsweek, both Dr Kari Stefansson (founder of deCODE Genetics) and Professor David Goldstein (Duke University) highlighted potential flaws in the data.

Dr Stefansson raised concerns that because the study used different DNA scanning systems for the centenarians and controls, this could lead to 'genotyping bias'. He was especially worried about one of the 'gene chips' used, the 610-Quad manufactured by Illumina, because this chip has been shown to have a number of quirks that may account for the associations seen.

Professor Goldstein also highlighted how these types of analyses can produce experimental differences that impact on the results produced, if different chips are used or if analyses are carried out in other laboratories. Other researchers were concerned that the sample size of 1,000 centenarians and 1,200 controls was too small for this type of genome-wide association study (GWAS).

But the study authors Dr Thomas Perls and Professor Paola Sebastiani from Boston University were reported to be 'standing by their findings'. Dr Perls, for example, was quoted saying: 'there have been very premature and harmful proclamations about the data' and that 'good science takes time' (Science Insider, 8th July).

The discovery of the apparent 'flaws' in this data also raise wider questions about the validity of such studies and why the journal Science did not pick up on these problems sooner, Discover Magazine's Gene Expression blog said.

Authors of Controversial Longevity Study Discuss the Furore
ScienceInsider |  8 July 2010
Faulty Gene-Scanning Chip Calls Results of Major Lifespan Study Into Question
Popular Science |  7 July 2010
Genetic study on longevity may be flawed
Los Angeles Times |  8 July 2010
Science bite Longevity gene study has flaws
Sciblogs |  8 July 2010
Scientist Smackdown: Experts Question Study of Longevity Genetics
Discover Magazine blog |  8 July 2010
Significant faults in 'longevity genes' study surface
Scientific American |  8 July 2010
The Little Flaw in the Longevity-Gene Study That Could Be a Big Problem
Newsweek |  7 July 2010
The short life expectancy of longevity genes
Discover Magazine blogs |  8 July 2010
15 September 2014 - by Ari Haque 
Activating a single gene can slow the ageing process and considerably extend life, scientists have discovered...
3 October 2011 - by Dr Louisa Petchey 
A gene associated with increased lifespan in a number of organisms is now thought to have no effect on longevity after a second look revealed significant flaws in the original studies on which the assumptions were based. The findings will disappoint the manufacturers of many anti-ageing creams that claim to work by activating the gene, but are unlikely to put a stop to research...
25 July 2011 - by Dr Lux Fatimathas 
The journal Science has retracted a controversial paper on the genetics of extreme longevity by scientists at Boston University. The paper, released online last year, was retracted before publication in print following a formal ‘expression of concern’ regarding fundamental technical flaws....
16 May 2011 - by Dr Lux Fatimathas 
US researchers claim women who give birth to twins live longer than those who give birth to single babies. They speculate that the ability to successfully birth twins reflects a general biological robustness in the health of these women. A twin pregnancy is known to be more taxing on the mother's body and therefore was not thought to be biologically advantageous....
18 April 2011 - by Dr Nadeem Shaikh 
A research team from King's College London led by Dr Guangju Zhai has completed a meta-analysis of seven genetic studies looking at the role of the hormone, dehydroepiandrosterone sulphate (DHEAS), and how it may affect the ageing process in humans...
5 July 2010 - by Chris Chatterton 
Stories about a genetic test to see if you would live to 100 abounded in the UK press last week. Was this hype or something more? The stories arose following the publication of a paper in Science where researchers claimed to have identified regions of the genome linked to exceptional longevity...
26 November 2006 - by Zulehkha Waheed 
New research from the University of Chicago in the US suggests that first-born children of young mothers have the best chance of living to 100; statistical results show this to be up to 1.7 times more likely than their siblings. Results were produced by studies from US...
28 August 2001 - by BioNews 
A team of scientists from four medical research centres in the US has discovered that a section of chromosome four contains a gene or genes associated with longevity. By studying the genes of 137 people aged 100 years or more, and their siblings aged between 91 and 109, a section...
to add a Comment.

By posting a comment you agree to abide by the BioNews terms and conditions

Syndicate this story - click here to enquire about using this story.