Page URL:

Lesbian ruled not child's legal 'parent'

21 June 2010
Appeared in BioNews 563

The ex-partner of a lesbian cannot be forced to pay child maintenance for the couple's donor-conceived child because they never entered a civil partnership, a High Court judge has ruled.

Mr Justice Moylan said the woman 'B' was the 'social and psychological' parent of the child, conceived by her former partner in 2000.

When the couple's relationship ended in 2007, 'B' won a shared residence order with the child and gained parental responsibility.

But this didn't mean 'B' was financially responsible for the child, Justice Moylan told the High Court in Leeds, because there is a difference between a 'legal' and 'natural' parent.

'This might appear a persuasive point save for the fact that the mere obtaining of parental responsibility is clearly not intended to make someone a legal parent when they would not otherwise be such', he said.

It was not the courts' responsibility to widen the definition of 'parent', he said.

'I have come to the clear conclusion that those against whom orders can be made... are confined to those who are a parent in the legal meaning of that word'.

'If I were to extend the definition to include anyone who has acted as a parent, I do not see how I could properly define the limits of such an extended definition in a way which would provide sufficient legal certainty'.

Lesbian mother cannot be forced to pay maintenance
The Telegraph |  17 June 2010
Lesbian mother escapes child maintenance payments
Pink Paper |  18 June 2010
Ruling on child support for lesbian 'parent'
Yorkshire Post |  18 June 2010
15 November 2010 - by Nishat Hyder 
A gay man and a lesbian couple have been embroiled in a complex and unprecedented legal battle in the Court of Appeal of England and Wales over access to their two children conceived through artificial insemination....
8 November 2010 - by Natalie Gamble 
A lesbian couple who had conceived a child together through donor insemination at a UK clinic recently ended up in the High Court after their relationship broke down. Their dispute involved a ten-year-old child, and the issue was whether the non-birth mother (who the court had already given legal decision-making status as a parent) should be ordered to make financial provision for her child...
25 October 2010 - by Dr Vivienne Raper 
The first parenthood show for gay and single people was held on Saturday in London. The Alternative Families Show featured seminars about fertility treatment, adoption, surrogacy and other options for starting a family...
30 April 2010 - by Louisa Ghevaert 
Birth certificates have been a hot topic in the UK in recent weeks. There has been much controversy, confusion and misunderstanding, aptly shown by Caroline Gammell's article in The Daily Telegraph newspaper and Colin Fernandez's article in the Daily Mail on 19 April incorrectly hailing the advent of the first lesbian couple to both be named as parents on their baby daughter's birth certificate, born 31 March this year. Lesbian couples have not in fact had to wait until the beginning of April...
19 April 2010 - by Dr Vivienne Raper 
A lesbian couple have claimed to be the UK's first to be both named on their child's birth certificate. Natalie Woods and Betty Knowles signed the certificate after the birth of Lily-May Betty Woods, who was conceived using donor sperm....
29 March 2010 - by Ailsa Stevens 
New legislation allowing same-sex couples to become the legal parents of children born following surrogacy will come into force next week. The change to the law means that couples using surrogacy no longer need to be married to be named on their child's birth certificate and is intended to afford unmarried and same-sex couples using any form of assisted reproduction the same rights to legal parenthood. It forms the final stage of the implementation of the UK's Human Fertilisati...
to add a Comment.

By posting a comment you agree to abide by the BioNews terms and conditions

Syndicate this story - click here to enquire about using this story.