Page URL:

Babies' DNA secretly stored in NHS database

1 June 2010
Appeared in BioNews 560

The DNA of up to four million newborn babies is being stored in UK hospitals without proper parental consent.

Mothers are informed of routine heel-prick tests given to their newborn babies and are supplied with a leaflet explaining the future storage of these blood samples. The samples are used to test for serious medical conditions such as cystic fibrosis and sickle cell anaemia, however, they can also be accessed by the police, coroners and medical researchers.

The samples have been used in genetic research, without revealing the identity of the baby from which the sample came. However the samples can be connected to a specific individual through the use of hospital admission records. A Department of Health spokesperson said: 'There are strict safeguards in place that protect the sample once it is taken. On very rare occasions the police may request access to a particular sample. To be granted this access they must have a court order for a specific individual sample in a specific case'.

Government guidelines suggest these samples are kept for five years before they are destroyed, as is the case in Alder Hey Hospital in Liverpool, which is holding approximately 145,000 of the four million samples in question, according to Freedom of Information (FOI) Act requests. However Central Manchester Hospital, holding the largest amount of samples, numbering approximately 1.25 million, intends to keep these samples indefinitely.

'We do not want to put mothers off having these tests as they are very important for their babies' health, but the key issue really is how long these samples are being stored for. Some hospitals are hanging onto them indefinitely', said Dr Helen Wallace of Genewatch.

Shami Chakrabarti, director of the pressure group Liberty, said: 'As someone who gave consent for my own baby to be tested, I'm horrified that anyone would breach my trust, keep my child's sample for years on end and use it for all sorts of extraneous purposes. If they think that thrusting a leaflet in an exhausted new mother's hand creates informed consent, they can look forward to a flurry of claims under article 8 of the Human Rights Act'.

Dr Jane Kaye, Director of the Centre for Health, Law and Emerging Technologies at Oxford University emphasised the importance of these samples, when stating: 'It is very difficult to get samples like this to do public health screening. It is an enormous resource'. However she went on to say that sample procurement 'needs to be done properly and with proper consent. At the moment people are not being asked to sign a consent form or make a distinction between what is for their own child's health and the fact that this may be used for other purposes'. Liberty is currently requesting a formal investigation by Andrew Lansley, the new Secretary of State for Health.

Babies' DNA in secret vaults
The Express |  24 May 2010
DNA database created from babies' blood samples
Telegraph |  23 May 2010
DNA from millions of newborn babies is secretly stored on NHS database
Mail Online |  24 May 2010
NHS uses babies’ blood for secret database
Timesonline |  23 May 2010
27 February 2012 - by Jessica Ware 
Collecting DNA samples from adults arrested in California will remain legal, after a federal appeals court ruled last Thursday that Proposition 69, the measure behind the practice, was lawful....
6 February 2012 - by Suzanne Elvidge 
The idea of whole genome sequencing is becoming ever more popular, but it could mean you end up with more information than you bargained for; from your resistance to certain drugs to your risk of developing a range of diseases. But would you want to know? The Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute ethics team has launched a survey to find out what people really do (and don't) want to know about their genomes...
31 October 2011 - by Jessica Ware 
Google has joined forces with Californian start-up company, DNAnexus, to maintain a public DNA database online. The move follows an announcement by the US National Institutes of Health (NIH) that it may have to withdraw funding from the current public database, the Sequence Read Archive (SRA), due to funding cuts....
10 October 2011 - by Dr Mary Yarwood 
Plans to introduce broad powers to allow police to retain the DNA of innocent people should be abandoned, the UK Joint Committee on Human Rights (JCHR) has said....
17 September 2007 - by Ailsa Stevens 
Geneticists taking part in debate being held today at the British Society of Human Genetics (BSHG) annual conference in York will voice concerns over conflicts of interest emerging around the creation of human DNA databases. However, they will also highlight the importance of guaranteeing public confidence to...
25 June 2007 - by Dr Sue Gibbons 
Human genetics research is undergoing rapid and dramatic growth. Over recent years, human genetic databases, or 'biobanks', have burgeoned in number, size and sophistication. Many countries are developing population-scale collections, such as UK Biobank, to investigate complex common diseases. Meanwhile, both biomedical researchers and criminal forensic scientists are seeking greater...
9 October 2006 - by Professor Peter Farndon 
You can't draw and record a family tree without the permission of all the members shown on it - the Data Protection Act won't allow it''Medical confidentiality won't allow my laboratory to release a DNA result to allow genetic testing to be offered to another family member'.'You can't...
to add a Comment.

By posting a comment you agree to abide by the BioNews terms and conditions

Syndicate this story - click here to enquire about using this story.