Page URL:

Introduce payment for egg donors

6 April 2010
By Dr John Parsons
Trustee at the Progress Educational Trust (PET)
Appeared in BioNews 552
The recent news that a seminar set up by an American assisted conception clinic to promote its egg donation services in the UK would end with the award of free donor egg IVF treatment worth about £13,000 to a seminar participant has reignited the debate on whether and how much gamete and embryo donors should be paid. Overseas treatment also challenges the legal stipulation in the United Kingdom that donors be identifiable should the donor-conceived adult wish to know more about the donor parent. The debate hinges on the relative effect these two issues have on the shortage of donors in the UK.

It is not difficult to understand why so many couples attended the meeting, held in a London hotel. The demand for donor eggs in the UK far exceeds supply and treatment costs are high. The possibility that their number would be picked out of the hat must have made attendance irresistible for women and men distressed by their fertility problems.

Some fertility tourism is inevitable - there will always be some people denied treatment by the regulations or prevailing ethical opinion in the UK. If we are to protect these vulnerable people, we must keep reviewing the UK law to minimise the flow of patients to other jurisdictions where commercial considerations are paramount, rather than safety and the welfare of children born following treatment.

The clinic in the US promises anonymity to potential donors on the donor recruitment pages of their website. In the UK, since 2005, donors have to agree to identifying details being made available to donor-conceived children after their 18th birthday. This change in the regulations was introduced to bring the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act 1990 into line with the Human Rights Act 1998. It happened after the High Court confirmed that Article Eight of the European Convention on Human Rights (the right to respect for private and family life), brought into domestic law by the 1998 Act, was a valid legal basis to challenge the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority (HFEA)'s support for donor anonymity. Many British women and couples travel overseas to escape our laws because they do not wish their donor-conceived children to know of their origin. These numbers may only be reduced by education and a change of culture so this becomes unacceptable. Other patients may be forced into accepting eggs from an anonymous donor because of the lack of donors in this country. They may then regret being unable to give their donor-conceived children the information they need to establish their identity. We may be able to help this latter group by relaxing the prohibition of payment to donors.

The HFEA allows 'shared egg donation'. Women with a fertility problem requiring privately funded treatment, after appropriate screening and counseling, are superovulated and donate half their eggs to a woman who needs donor eggs and pays for both their treatments. This payment in kind - but payment none the less - induces women to donate who would be otherwise unable to afford treatment and whose eggs may not be top quality. This way of obtaining eggs has kept the donor egg 'business' going for private clinics in the UK. They argue everyone gains from this approach; the donor gets inexpensive or free treatment and the recipient gets the eggs she needs. From the donor's point-of-view, the need for this ethically dubious arrangement is reducing as the UK's National Health Service provides more cycles of treatment for women who don't require donor eggs.

The time has come to look again at offering proportionate payments to women without a fertility problem who donate eggs. Such women would decide to donate without the pressure of needing treatment themselves. With careful donor selection, the results of treatment would increase to the levels obtained in the US. The potential donor would have to be counseled carefully about the risks of the medication to superovulate her ovaries and the procedure required to collect the eggs, but these risks are very small. Licensed clinics should stop using eggs from egg sharing arrangements and be banned from supporting links with overseas clinics that use anonymous donors.

30 September 2011 - by Dr Kamal Ahuja 
The Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority (HFEA) has already made two decisions following its public consultation and review of gamete donation policies in the UK: first, intra-familial gamete donation can continue as before (subject to certain provisions); and second, the number of families which a single donor might help create remains limited to ten. The bigger question on compensation and benefit in kind to donors will not be answered until later this year...
4 April 2011 - by Professor Brian Lieberman 
Human eggs are in short supply. Whilst the first reaction to the concept of payment for eggs may evoke the 'yuk' response, is this response rational? However, significant differences of opinion, ethical conduct and attitudes prevail. Yet, it can be argued that payment in one form or another is justified not only to try to meet this need, but also to reduce exploitation of the women who require donated eggs and those who have specifically been recruited into the egg trading market from...
4 April 2011 - by Anthony Bagshawe 
In all the coverage of the recent debate about egg and sperm donation, there has been much said about whether or not egg donors should be paid. Arguments have been put forward on various points and counter claims made. However, in all this what seems to have been missed is that there are in fact two totally separate arguments which have become merged into one, namely payment and compensation...
25 October 2010 - by Sarah Pritchard 
Should we pay women to become egg donors to tackle the 'mismatch' between supply and demand? This question was debated last week in an event organised by the Progress Educational Trust in partnership with the Royal Society of Medicine, supported by the National Gamete Donation Trust and the British Fertility Society (BFS)...
31 August 2010 - by Rose Palmer 
Egg and sperm donors in the UK could receive increased compensation under new proposals aimed at reducing the number of couples travelling abroad for treatment...
22 March 2010 - by Dr Gabrielle Samuel 
'IVF doctors to raffle human egg' ran the Sunday Times headline on 14 March 2010. A seminar sponsored by an American clinic took place in London at which a human egg and a cycle of in vitro fertilisation (IVF) treatment was awarded to one couple who attended...
21 March 2010 - by Dr Vivienne Raper 
'More and more' Brits are travelling to the US for donor egg IVF, according to a physician at the heart of last week's egg raffle controversy. The Genetics & IVF Institute (GIVF) near Washington DC has already treated around 10 British women and a further 15 - 20 are interested, Dr Laurence Udoff told reporters at a news briefing on Wednesday....
15 March 2010 - by Ailsa Stevens 
A donated human egg will be raffled on Wednesday to mark the launch of a new IVF service which helps UK women to access egg donation services in America. The new service, offered by the Bridge Centre in London, will allow patients to select egg donors on the basis of characteristics such as racial background, health, education and appearance....
to add a Comment.

By posting a comment you agree to abide by the BioNews terms and conditions

Syndicate this story - click here to enquire about using this story.