Page URL:

Australia considers lifting ban on sex selection

15 March 2010
Appeared in BioNews 549

The Australian federal five-year moratorium on the use of gender selection technology in IVF treatment for so-called 'social' reasons ends this year, reopening this controversial debate. The Australian health watchdog, the National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC), confirmed that that it will be conducting a review of this issue, beginning within the next few months, after the completion of its ongoing review of the Research Involving Human Embryos Act and the Prohibition of Human Cloning for Reproduction Act.

At present the use of gender selection technology - specifically, selection by using PGD (preimplantation genetic diagnosis) - is only allowed where parents carry a serious genetic disorder that can be passed on and detected through gender. The social use of gender selection was banned in 2004 by federal legislation, and earlier in 1998 by state legislation in Victoria.

How the NHMRC will choose to act post-review is the subject of much speculation. It is important to note that any legislation introduced by this body is federally binding and would override state legislation. An alternative route would be for the NHMRC to introduce guidelines allowing gender selection on non-medical grounds, therefore leaving the legislative decisions about what specific grounds might be included within this - or not - to individual state and territorial governments.

Such course of action would create a situation where the choice of gender selection is legally available in some Australian states, but not in others, and might lead to 'inter-state fertility tourism'. Fertility tourism for gender selection purposes is by no means a new phenomenon. The Australian newspaper, the Herald Sun, revealed in December 2008 that many Australian couples were travelling to the US or Thailand for fertility treatment where they are free to choose the gender of their baby.

The use of gender selection technology for non-medical purposes such as 'family balancing' or because of cultural influences is controversial on ethical and religious grounds. However, there has been a strong lobby from within the medical profession in favour of allowing this technology for social reasons.

Professor Gab Kovacs, an IVF pioneer, is leading the lobby: 'If I am prepared to pay for it out of my own pocket so it is not the community paying, I can't understand why that should be forbidden,' he said, adding: 'It might even be in the interests of the child. If a couple so badly want a boy or a girl that they are prepared to go through IVF and gender selection then maybe, if they had the child naturally and it was the wrong gender it may not be looked after as well'.

Professor Kovacs further points out that at $10,000 - $15,000 only extremely determined couples will actually use gender selection technology. Dr Michael Chapman, a senior infertility specialist at IVF Australia, echoed this sentiment: 'Very few patients I see ask to choose the sex of their child - less than five per cent'.

Across Australia many doctors are voicing their support for freedom of choice when it comes to gender selection. Some however, such as Dr Lyndon Hale, chairman of Melbourne IVF, are tempering their support. Although Dr Hale is in favour of giving parents the choice to use gender selection technology, he believes that this should only be allowed where there is a significant benefit for both the parents and the child in doing so.

Boy or girl is not so simple
Herald Sun |  13 March 2010
Parents push for unnatural selection
Daily Telegraph (Australia) |  13 March 2010
Research council to consider lifting bans on sex-selection technology
Herald Sun |  13 March 2010
15 August 2011 - by Dr Malcolm Smith 
The Australian state of Victoria was the first common law jurisdiction in the world to enact legislation to regulate assisted reproductive technologies (ARTs). Victoria's legislative framework has been updated a number of times and the most recent legislation (the Assisted Reproductive Treatment Act 2008 (Vic)) came into effect on 1 January 2010...
11 July 2011 - by Nishat Hyder 
The German parliament has passed a new law allowing PGD in limited circumstances. Under the new law, couples undergoing IVF can use PGD to screen embryos only if the parents have a predisposition to a serious genetic illness...
14 March 2011 - by Ben Jones 
An Australian Senate Standing Committee has published a report calling for widespread updates to the law governing donor conception, including greater monitoring of compliance among clinics and practitioners and the development of new forms of oversight to support the current regulatory framework....
24 January 2011 - by Leo Perfect 
An Australian couple are going to court to fight for their right to choose the sex of their next child. They applied to use IVF with gender selection technology to guarantee a daughter, but an independent bioethics panel rejected their request...
4 October 2010 - by Ken Hanscombe 
The probability of having a male baby is affected by fertility treatments, Australian scientists have found. The national population-based study is the first to assess the impact of fertility treatments on the ratio of boys to girls born...
8 February 2010 - by Anoushka Shepherd 
Any media coverage focusing on views toward children is always bound to be both emotive and contentious. '8 Boys and Wanting a Girl' fit that description perfectly. Throughout Channel 4's hour-long show, I felt an emotional cocktail of disgust, confusion, empathy, sorrow and disbelief....
3 November 2008 - by Sarah Pritchard 
The BBC has exposed a Turkish clinic offering prospective parents in the UK the chance to illegally select the sex of their children. Secret filming carried out in London by BBC reporter Colette McBeth reveals that the Jinemed Center in Istanbul offers to carry out sex selection...
Log in to add a Comment.

By posting a comment you agree to abide by the BioNews terms and conditions

Syndicate this story - click here to enquire about using this story.