Page URL: https://www.bionews.org.uk/page_92202

Canada considers genetic discrimination law

1 March 2010
Appeared in BioNews 547

Canadians need better protection from genetic discrimination by insurers and employers, according to Winnipeg North MP Judy Wasylycia-Leis.

Mrs Wasylycia-Leis announced she will introduce a proposal into the Canadian House of Commons this spring amending the Human Rights Act to include 'genetic characteristics' as a prohibited ground for discrimination.

'This bill will stop Canadians' personal genetic information from being used against them', she said.

Canada needs to follow other nations' legislative initiatives, Mrs Wasylycia says. She reportedly believes abuse of genetic information will only increase without regulatory safeguards as more and cheaper genetic tests become widely available to detect a person's susceptibility to a growing range of genetic conditions.

'Unless genetic test results are protected, there's a real danger that Canadians will just refuse to be tested, putting their health at risk', she said.

The Canadian Coalition for Genetic Fairness (CCGF), a coalition of 15 disease-related associations dedicated to preventing genetic discrimination, helped Mrs Wasylycia-Leis draft the bill. The CCGF wants regulatory reform for the insurance industry in light of genetic advances.

Mr Don Lamont, CEO of the Huntington Society of Canada and chair of the CCGF, says predictive testing is 'a good thing', but warned it also carries 'a growing fear that the information can lead to stigma and discrimination'.

The bill would not explicitly prohibit insurers or businesses from demanding genetic tests, but will allow the courts to decide what practices are discriminatory. Mr Lamont believes it should also invite judicial examination of privacy legislation and genetic information.

The CCGF estimate that the number of genetic tests available over the last decade has increased from 100 to over 1,500.

Many nations are currently examining and regulating on genetic discrimination. In May 2008, the US passed legislation prohibiting employment and health insurance (not life insurance) genetic discrimination.

In the UK, there is a voluntary moratorium between the government and insurance industry on the use of genetic test results until 2014. Exceptions include testing for Huntington's disease in patients requesting life insurance above £500,000 or health cover above £300,000.

In comparison, France and Spain strictly outlaw all use of genetic test results by all insurers.

SOURCES & REFERENCES
Genetic tests targeted
WINNIPEG SUN |  26 February 2010
Private member's bill would outlaw genetic discrimination
The Vancouver Sun |  26 February 2010
Taking Action Against Genetic Discrimination
CJOB |  25 February 2010
RELATED ARTICLES FROM THE BIONEWS ARCHIVE
8 February 2016 - by Ryan Ross 
The parents of a child carrying genetic markers for cystic fibrosis are suing a school for alleged discrimination and unlawful disclosure of personal information...
8 August 2011 - by Dr Rebecca Hill 
'The age of personalised medicine: genes, privacy and discrimination?' was the last in BioCentre's 2010/2011 symposium series 'Revolution, Regulation and Responsibilities', and promised to 'appraise current developments and consider the current legal and regulatory position for their use before taking time to reflect and assess the future impact on society'...
22 November 2010 - by MacKenna Roberts 
The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC), responsible for enforcing federal anti-discrimination laws in the US, has issued its 'final rule' guidelines clarifying how federal laws should operate to prevent job discrimination on the basis of genetic information....
2 July 2010 - by Catherine Casserley 
People with a genetic predisposition to health problems may experience prejudice from employers, prospective employers or insurers due to a perception that they will develop a condition that could seriously affect their work and life. But can present UK legislation protect them against this potentially discriminatory treatment given that it is based on perceived - not actual - disability?
22 February 2010 - by Ben Jones 
An Australian insurance firm has become the subject of criticism after offering customers reduced price genetic tests while providing in the small print that the results are to be made available for consideration by life insurance providers should they desire them....
14 September 2009 - by Rosie Beauchamp 
A study published in the Medical Journal of Australia indicates that up to 50 per cent of Australians could be refusing genetic tests due to the fear that the test outcomes will result in increased health insurance premiums or refusal to insure them altogether. In Australia, genetic information does not inform health insurance. However, it may affect insurance policies that cover trauma, disability, sickness and accidents. Applicants for such health insurance policies have a statutory duty to...
15 June 2009 - by Dr Sarah Spain 
A study by researchers at the University of British Columbia in Canada and published in the British Medical Journal has shown that individuals at risk of Huntington's disease (HD) are often discriminated against by insurance companies, and also by their own relatives and friends. They also found that this discrimination was based on family history of the disease rather than any genetic test results....
23 March 2009 - by MacKenna Roberts 
Researchers at the University of Tasmania, Australia, have conducted the world's first study to have verified incidents of genetic discrimination and warn that such incidents are likely to increase without better safeguards. The five-year study surveyed 1,000 individuals who have had genetic testing during the past ten...
2 June 2008 - by MacKenna Roberts 
Last Wednesday, President Bush signed into law the US's long-awaited Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act ('GINA'), heralded as the first civil rights legislation of the new millennium. The legislation swept Congress with a combined almost-unanimous 509-1 vote and will prohibit genetic discrimination by employers, insurers and unions...
HAVE YOUR SAY
Log in to add a Comment.

By posting a comment you agree to abide by the BioNews terms and conditions


Syndicate this story - click here to enquire about using this story.