Save 20% on your next Cambridge Bioethics and Law online purchase
Page URL: https://www.bionews.org.uk/page_91454

What can one nation learn from another?  Exploring policy choice in the new Canadian framework for assisted human reproduction.

3 October 2005
By Dr Mavis Jones
Senior Research Associate,Centre for Environmental Risk, School of Environmental Sciences, University of East Anglia
Appeared in BioNews 328
The current public consultation on the Human Fertilisation and Embryology (HFE) Act, according to the government's official statement, is intended 'to ensure that the law remains effective and fit for purpose in the early 21st century'. The HFE Act has managed to maintain political authority over its 15 year tenure - but not without detractors. The Act, and its embodiment the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority, are operating in a policy field of increasing uncertainty and contest (usually on moral grounds). In the UK and elsewhere, governments are acknowledging the need for their regulatory frameworks to remain adaptable to the unpredictable future implications of reproductive and genetic technologies.

As a policy issue, assisted human reproduction has rarely been easy to address. Ever since humans have been able to control their own reproductive capacities, the act of having a child has become tightly bound up in discourses of rights, responsibilities, and moral positions. We're familiar with the historical impact of these discourses in controversies around forced sterilisation, abortion, and early IVF. The intersection of genetics with reproductive technologies has launched a new series of debates of unprecedented complexity about the extent to which states should interfere with individual choice around reproduction. This is especially true in nations where socialised medicine means that some clinical services are subsidised by public taxes, paid by those who may not support the moral position taken by the state.

The above description applies to the UK, but also to its past colony, Canada. In 2004, Canada established a new regulatory framework for reproductive technologies which owes a debt to the UK HFE Act. Fifteen years in the making, the Assisted Human Reproduction Act represents the cumulative efforts of a Royal Commission, a voluntary moratorium on several controversial technologies in 1995, deliberations of Health Canada advisory and ad hoc committees, parliamentary debates, and several Ministers of Health. The outcome is a policy which was touted on its birth, in a Health Canada press release, as 'the most comprehensive in the world' - outlawing commercial surrogacy agreements, the sale of eggs and sperm, and most controversially, therapeutic cloning. In this policy arena Canada is a late regulator, compared to other western nations; but its outcome is one of the most prohibitive.

The new Canadian regulatory framework for reproductive and genetic technologies presents a unique opportunity to study lesson drawing in policy development. When faced with intractable policy problems nations often draw lessons from politically proximal nations: those with whom they share a structural or ideological affinity. Canada's framework for reproductive technologies shows the influences of its two most powerful neighbours, the US and the UK.  The lessons learned from these two contexts, taken together with the unique combination of domestic pressures, have contributed to a framework which in many ways departs from the more liberal approaches taken by its neighbours. In the Canadian framework there is a particular emphasis on rejecting practices which render womens' bodies and reproductive processes subject to commodification: for example, commercial surrogacy agreements and harvesting eggs for research purposes (hence the ban on therapeutic cloning). The conscious positioning of Canada in the global spectrum of this complex policy arena bears the marks of how the policy community has interpreted 'the ethics and values of Canadians', a concept developed throughout public consultations and parliamentary deliberations on how best to formulate policy in this complex area.

In January 2005, thanks to the UK's Economic and Social Research Council, I was able to begin a project to research the nature of policy learning in the genesis of the Canadian Assisted Human Reproduction Act. To this end I have been conducting interviews with key policy actors in Canada and the UK, to explore their decisional processes and their perceptions of the role of lesson drawing in policy development - with particular attention to the interaction between policy learning and domestic pressures in shaping policy choice.

This project concludes at the end of December 2005 and contributes to the recently established Global Biopolitics Research Group at the University of East Anglia, under the directorship of Brian Salter. For more information, please email me.

SOURCES & REFERENCES
RELATED ARTICLES FROM THE BIONEWS ARCHIVE
25 October 2010 - by Antony Starza-Allen 
A Canadian woman conceived through donor insemination has been allowed to bring legal action against the province of British Columbia to obtain information about her biological heritage, which may include the identity of the sperm donor involved....
7 June 2010 - by Antony Starza-Allen 
A third board member of Canada's fertility industry regulator, the Assisted Human Reproduction Canada (AHRC), has resigned. Irene Ryll, the agency's consumer representative, resigned from her duties leaving critics to call for a public investigation into its operations, or lack of...
7 June 2010 - by Professor Jocelyn Downie 
In the past three months, three members of the Board of Directors of Assisted Human Reproduction Canada (AHRC) have resigned. This set of resignations is cause for serious concern and requires urgent attention from the federal Parliamentary Standing Committee on Health and Parliament itself....
17 May 2010 - by Antony Starza-Allen 
Canada's fertility licensing and regulatory body, Assisted Human Reproduction Canada (AHRC), has come under fire from lawyers and doctors who are finding the country's fertility laws vague and uncertain, the National Post newspaper reports...
22 March 2010 - by MacKenna Roberts 
The Canadian ban against women selling their eggs as a source of eggs for fertility treatments is reported to be systemically flawed in practice, according to an expose article published in the April 2010 edition of the Canadian magazine The Walrus. Journalist Alison Motluk interviewed egg 'donors' and recipients, fertility experts and regulators, revealing that the Canadian ban is as farcical as its loose interpretation of the word 'donor'. The article attributed the discrepan...
8 March 2004 - by BioNews 
A Canadian Senate committee has unanimously passed legislation on assisted reproductive technologies (ARTs) and related matters. Approval by the Senate virtually guarantees that the Assisted Human Reproduction Act - which has been years in the making - will receive Royal Assent and become law. Last October, bill C-13, entitled 'an Act...
16 February 2004 - by BioNews 
The Canadian federal government has reintroduced its bill on assisted reproductive technologies (ARTs) and related matters. Last October, bill C-13, entitled 'an Act respecting assisted human reproduction and related research', was passed by the Canadian House of Commons by 149-109 votes, after almost ten years of debate and...
30 October 2003 - by BioNews 
Having stumbled in its passage through parliament earlier this month, Canada's long awaited legislation on assisted reproductive technologies (ARTs) and related matters has finally been passed by the Canadian House of Commons. Bill C-13, entitled 'an Act respecting assisted human reproduction', was first introduced to the Canadian parliament in...
HAVE YOUR SAY
Log in to add a Comment.

By posting a comment you agree to abide by the BioNews terms and conditions


Syndicate this story - click here to enquire about using this story.