Page URL: https://www.bionews.org.uk/page_90875

Fertility experts suggest reforms to overcome sperm shortage

17 November 2008
Appeared in BioNews 484

Sperm donation services require infrastructural reorganisation, 'sperm-sharing' incentive schemes and regulatory reforms to overcome the severe shortage presently causing 'anguish' to thousands of infertile couples in the UK each year and to the health professionals unable to provide treatment to their patients, according to fertility experts writing in the British Medical Journal (BMJ). An estimated 10 per cent of UK clinics have had to cease offering treatments using donated sperm, driving infertile couples abroad or to join lengthy waiting-lists at British clinics, according to Dr Mark Hamilton and Dr Allan Pacey, chairman and secretary respectively of the British Fertility Society (BFS).

One in seven UK couples have problems conceiving with half attributable to male infertility. Around 4,000 UK patients request donor sperm each year, yet in 2006 there were only 307 sperm donors. The authors estimate that a minimum of 500 donors per year would be needed to meet the demand.

Currently, regulation allows for a maximum limit of 10 families to receive sperm from the same donor as a precaution against children from the same donor parent unwittingly reproducing together. The authors criticise the limit as an 'arbitrary' reflection of generalised societal bias of how many children an individual should father rather than 'evidence-based' on any real risk, genetic or otherwise. Hamilton compares the Netherlands, where the population is a quarter of Britain's and where a donor's limit is 25 families. Despite the high limit, the Dutch also have a sperm donor shortage, which some experts blame on the removal of donor anonymity in 2004. In France, where the population is similar to the UK and donors retain anonymity, only five women may receive sperm from the same donor and there too exists a donor shortage.

The BFS argues that given Britain's population size, this limit should be removed and a more flexible approach adopted through agreement between donors and recipients. The US does not limit sperm donations, according to Eleanor Nicoll, spokeswoman for the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Instead, guidance recommends that a single donor be limited to 25 births in a population of 800,000. The Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority (HFEA) has said it will review the regulation.

Another suggestion was to allow 'sperm-sharing' schemes which would offer infertile couples discounted IVF treatment in return for sperm donation, in a similar way to controversial egg-sharing schemes. Critics oppose these initiatives as tantamount to selling gametes and exploiting emotionally vulnerable couples desperate to conceive who are coerced into donating their gametes for a bargain price as the only way they can afford treatment. Supporters view it as a mutual benefit for all involved in shared circumstances.

According to the BFS article, 35 per cent of initial interest expressed by potential donors is not followed-up for assessment. The authors feel that efficiency and accessibility must be improved to capture this lost opportunity. They suggest a structural re-organisation whereby large regional centres recruit and manage donors with smaller local centres providing services for recipients.

The authors cited the removal of donor anonymity in April 2005 - allowing children to trace their donor parent once eighteen - as a key causal factor for the shortage. Donor anonymity is optional in the US and many experts there believe this is why they do not have a sperm donation shortage.

However, donor numbers were declining before the UK removed donor anonymity - dropping by 40 per cent in 15 years (a third in the last decade). In 1991 there were 503 recorded sperm donors but by 2000 there were only 325, according to official records. A spokesperson for the Department of Health denied that changes in anonymity law are responsible for the shortage but said the Government welcomes consideration of the BFS recommendations to boost sperm donations.

Dr Hamilton said that donor anonymity has been debated for years by Parliament and he accepts the decision as a 'non-negotiable stance'. He suggests that other options should be explored that 'work within these constraints'. The BFS doctors did not support raising the donor age-limit above 40 or relaxing semen quality standards. Furthermore, Dr Pacey who runs a clinic in Sheffield, stated that imported sperm donations have not proven to be a solution to the shortage.

SOURCES & REFERENCES
Britain calls for more sperm donors amid shortage
Associated Press |  13 November 2008
Call to raise sperm donor limit
BBC News Online |  12 November 2008
Sperm donor shortage critical
Reuters |  12 November 2008
Sperm donors should get cut-price IVF to tackle shortage
The Daily Telegraph |  11 November 2008
RELATED ARTICLES FROM THE BIONEWS ARCHIVE
6 June 2011 - by Nisha Satkunarajah 
A man who froze his sperm at a fertility clinic over ten years ago has spoken of his distress after finding out his ex-wife had tricked the clinic into using the sperm, resulting in the birth of two children. He was then ordered by a court to pay 100,000 towards their upbringing...
11 January 2010 - by Antony Starza-Allen 
A British woman has travelled to Denmark to undergo donor insemination after the fertility clinic where she had been receiving treatment in the UK ran out of sperm, BBC News reports. Single and 41, Abby, who is using a pseudonym, made the decision after three unsuccessful insemination attempts in the UK using donated sperm. Once the clinic informed her there was no more sperm available she contacted the Danish clinic. Following treatment there she gave birth to a...
6 July 2009 - by Antony Starza-Allen 
An acute shortage of donor sperm is diminishing the capacity of the UK's public and private health sectors to treat infertility, resulting in growing concern and lengthening waiting lists at clinics. The shortage is widely attributed to the removal, in 2005, of entitlement to donor anonymity. The Progress Educational Trust, with support from the Royal Society of Medicine and the British Fertility Society (BFS) staged a panel discussion on Thursday 25 June 2009 entitled 'Banking Crisis - what ...
2 February 2009 - by Katy Sinclair 
The health board of NHS Grampian in Scotland have included a plea for sperm and egg donations on thousands of staff payslips, in an effort to restore depleted stocks at their Aberdeen fertility clinic. The message has appealed for male donors aged 18 to 45 and female...
12 January 2009 - by Ben Jones 
The British Fertility Society (BFS) has announced a substantial reworking of guidelines for the donation of gametes and embryos for assisted reproduction so as to increase safety for recipients of donated reproductive material. The guidelines, which replace the BFS's 2000 guidelines for egg and embryo donations and...
18 February 2008 - by Peter Wardle 
Legislation removing donor anonymity came into force in the UK in April 2005. Transitional arrangements, to allow the opportunity to use up reserves of anonymously donated sperm, were short; only one year. After that, the use of anonymously donated sperm was illegal.Since then, there have been a number of...
13 January 2008 - by Dr Kamal Ahuja 
The consequences of the removal of anonymity for gamete donors in terms of quality and number have been a cause of concern to patients, clinics and policy makers in the UK. At the London Women's Clinic (LWC), donor insemination (DI) is an integral part of our life. We have the...
4 April 2007 - by Laura Witjens 
The National Gamete Donation Trust (NGDT) has never believed that removal of anonymity in the UK caused the decline in sperm donor numbers. As we said in a previous BioNews commentary: 'It is important to remember that, with or without the removal of anonymity, there have never been enough gamete...
7 August 2006 - by Pip Morris and Laura Witjens 
Britain's sperm crisis' was the front page of The Independent on Sunday (30 July) accompanied by another article: 'Your country needs you'. As was expected, the removal of anonymity was blamed for the decline in sperm donors and the presented solution looked simple: reverse the law and donors would come...
26 September 2005 - by Pip Morris 
Today, John Gonzalez, founder of the internet sperm firm Man Not Included, announced that he is launching a direct mailing campaign to attract new sperm donors. The mailshot will be sent to 50,000 men, to tackle the predicted shortage of donors following the announcement earlier this year that people conceived...
HAVE YOUR SAY
to add a Comment.

By posting a comment you agree to abide by the BioNews terms and conditions


Syndicate this story - click here to enquire about using this story.