Save 20% on your next Cambridge Bioethics and Law online purchase
Page URL: https://www.bionews.org.uk/page_90699

President Bush signs genetic anti-discrimination bill into law

2 June 2008
Appeared in BioNews 460

Last Wednesday, President Bush signed into law the US's long-awaited Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act ('GINA'), heralded as the first civil rights legislation of the new millennium. The legislation swept Congress with a combined almost-unanimous 509-1 vote and will prohibit genetic discrimination by employers, insurers and unions. After a 12-year struggle to pass this legislation, Democrat House Representative Louise Slaughter, who first introduced the legislation, declared it 'a tremendous victory for every American' because everyone is 'predisposed to at least a few genetic-based disorders...'.

GINA generally prevents insurers and employers from requesting predictive genetic testing or accessing their results. Employers will not be able to hire, fire, promote or compensate an employee on the basis of genetic tests. The employment provisions - which become effective in 18 months - require victims to prove intentional discrimination but allow recovery of punitive and compensatory damages leading to potentially steep fines against employers up to £150,000 per breach. Critics say that the provisions are too broad and will open the floodgates to frivolous litigation.

Health insurers likewise will not be able to determine coverage, premium rates or increases/changes to terms based upon genetic tests indicating susceptibility to disease and may only continue to consider existing/expressed diseases. The health insurance protections - which come into effect in one year - are criticised for not including long-term care or life insurance.

The actual impact of GINA may be minimal in preventing genetic discrimination which is reportedly rare but the key benefit is hope that Americans will feel safer. While opponents argue GINA is premature, studies and healthcare professionals support that a prevalent public fear exists that their genetic information will be abused. Whether genetic discrimination is or will be a genuine threat, it is hoped that GINA will alleviate the public anxieties about genetic testing. Sharon Terry, president of the Coalition and CEO of Genetic Alliance stated that 'individuals no longer have to worry about being discriminated against on the basis of their genetic information, and with this assurance, the promise of genetic testing and disease management and prevention can be realised more fully'.

Most states already have some regulation - 35 states have employment laws banning genetic discrimination and 47 states have laws restricting genetic discrimination in health care - but supporters feel the legislation implements a unified federal standard, sending a strong message that DNA may not be used for commercial advantage by employers or insurers.

Despite overwhelming popular support, GINA is not without major concerns. A fundamental objection is that it completely overlooks regulation of the genetic testing industry itself. The commercial market for direct-to-consumer genetic testing is largely unregulated lacking a regulatory entity or standards that assist people to understand test results or assess the validity of tests available. Bogus tests can cause needless worry or false reassurance based on their results. US government agencies issued a joint consumer warning against home testing and 24 states have laws restricting their availability but many feel this is not adequate.

Other concerns are that the special status that GINA affords genetic test information and the increased liability to insurers and employers will cause them to not provide this testing as part of basic healthcare plans. Still others argue that the function of this information to identify genetic susceptibility to disease can in many situations be equally obtained from non-genetic testing which inexplicably does not attract GINA's increased privacy protections.

SOURCES & REFERENCES
A not-so-protective law
Atlanta Journal - Constitution |  27 May 2008
People Need Protection From Unreliable Genetic Tests
The Washington Post |  27 May 2008
President Bush Signs Landmark Genetic Nondiscrimination Information Act Into Law
Science Daily |  26 May 2008
President George Bush Signed Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act Signed into Law
Wired News |  30 May 2008
RELATED ARTICLES FROM THE BIONEWS ARCHIVE
1 March 2010 - by MacKenna Roberts 
Canadians need better protection from genetic discrimination by insurers and employers, according to Winnipeg North MP Judy Wasylycia-Leis...
22 February 2010 - by Ben Jones 
An Australian insurance firm has become the subject of criticism after offering customers reduced price genetic tests while providing in the small print that the results are to be made available for consideration by life insurance providers should they desire them....
30 November 2009 - by Dr Jess Buxton 
After almost ten happy years as a BioNews editor, this issue will be my last. I started working for Progress Educational Trust (PET) in February 2000, nearly a year after BioNews was launched by Juliet Tizzard, the first PET director. In my first week, I remember thinking how useful a news digest of developments in the fast-moving areas of genetics and assisted reproduction was - and what a fascinating job it was going to be. But at the same time, I privately wondered whether there would be q...
30 March 2009 - by Ailsa Stevens 
Customers who undergo genetic testing to discover their risk of developing certain diseases may be offered lower premiums regardless of whether they disclose the results, a leading UK insurance company has said. The company believes that individuals who discover they are at increased risk of a disease...
16 June 2008 - by Antony Starza-Allen 
The Association of British Insurers (ABI) announced last Friday that a moratorium on the use of genetic test results by UK insurance companies has been extended until 2014. The agreement prevents insurance companies from requesting predicative genetic test results from customers which could be used to deny...
6 May 2008 - by MacKenna Roberts 
Following the Senate's unanimous approval the previous week, the US House of Representatives, on Thursday, almost-unanimously (414-1) passed the Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act ('GINA'), providing final Congressional support for legislation that prohibits genetic discrimination by employers, insurers and unions. The bill (HR 493), which is hailed...
28 April 2008 - by MacKenna Roberts 
The US Senate has unanimously (95-0) approved legislation to prohibit genetic discrimination by employers, insurers and unions. Following thirteen years of effort, the Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act ('GINA') is finally expected early next week, to breeze through approval in the House of Representatives, which supported the...
HAVE YOUR SAY
Log in to add a Comment.

By posting a comment you agree to abide by the BioNews terms and conditions


Syndicate this story - click here to enquire about using this story.