Page URL:

IVF baby born after sperm mix-up leads to US lawsuit

26 March 2007
Appeared in BioNews 400

New York State Supreme Court Justice Sheila Abdus-Salaam has allowed Thomas and Nancy Andrews to pursue unspecified damages for parts of their claim that in 2004, the fertility clinic Medical Services for Reproductive Medicine negligently used an unknown donor's sperm to fertilise Mrs Andrews's eggs, denying Mr Andrews biological fatherhood for their baby daughter, Jessica.

Justice Abdus-Salaam permitted the claim against Reginald Pucker to be held accountable as owner of the clinic, but rejected the claim against him individually, accepting defence attorney Martin B. Adam's argument that he did not personally 'examine, communicate with, treat or care for the couple' and, thus, did not bear personal liability. She also dismissed a claim against Dr Martin Keltz who advised the couple and performed the embryo implantation, but upheld the liability of the embryologist, Carlo Acosta, who processed the egg and sperm resulting in the alleged mix-up.

The judge sympathised with the complaint that the mistake has particular impact because it resulted in a child who is 'not even the same race, nationality, they are'. She cited the parents' testimony in her decision that although they love their baby, they are reminded of 'this terrible mistake every time we look at her; it is simply impossible to ignore...We are conscious and distressed by this mistake every time we appear in public'. The judge, however, rejected the argument that the baby's birth had caused the couple mental distress. The court accepted that baby Jessica may experience unnecessary hardship because she will not know 'the identity of her actual father, and will consequently never be able to know her full medical history and condition'.

Mrs Andrews, who is Hispanic, and Mr Andrews, who is Caucasian, quickly suspected the blunder when their newborn appeared to have a much darker complexion and showed facial and hair 'characteristics more typical of African or African-American descent', according to the lawsuit. The Andrews performed a genetic home test, which two later professional tests confirmed, that showed Thomas Andrews is not Jessica's father but Nancy Andrews is her genetic mother.

The parents have several concerns beyond the impact of the racial discrepancy that extend to fears for the emotional well-being of their child, fears of any claim from the genetic father and fears that their genetic materials have also been misused for others and they are unwittingly the biological parents of another's child due to the clinic's negligence with their samples.

Similar incidents and legal actions have occurred worldwide. In July 2002, the UK Chief Medical Officer, Sir Liam Donaldson, responded to a spate of fertility mix-ups by commissioning Professor Brian Toft to investigate these events. The official report found a mixture of errors at fault, including human error, poor management and system failures. The highly critical report made 100 recommendations, endorsing a high level of regulatory scrutiny currently not in existence in the US.

Fertility Clinic Sued After Sperm Mix-up
Associated Content |  22 March 2007
Suit in fertility clinic blunder
Newsday |  22 March 2007
US couple sue clinic for sperm sample mix-up
The Guardian |  23 March 2007
30 April 2012 - by Jessica Ware 
Two German gynaecologists will have to pay child support for twins after they artificially inseminated the mother without obtaining the father's permission to use his sperm, which he had asked to be destroyed two years earlier...
22 August 2011 - by Dr Vivienne Raper 
Mistakes in IVF treatment more than trebled in Britain during the last three years, according to figures from the UK's fertility regulator....
6 December 2010 - by Antony Starza-Allen 
Northern Ireland's High Court of Justice has rejected a claim for damages brought by two children born as a result of IVF treatment provided to their mother which resulted in them being of different skin colour than intended...
4 May 2010 - by Seil Collins 
The number of reported mistakes at IVF centres in England and Wales has doubled over one year, rising from 182 in 2007/08 to 334 in 2008/09. Incidents range from technical failures to serious mix-ups. Cases where embryos have been lost, implanted into the wrong patient, or fertilised with the wrong sperm have all been reported....
24 September 2007 - by MacKenna Roberts 
An Australian couple are suing their gynaecologist for medical negligence involving an IVF procedure in 2003 that resulted in the birth of twins. The birth mother expressed a wish to have only one embryo implanted, but instead two embryos were implanted resulting in the birth of twin...
31 May 2006 - by Dr Kirsty Horsey 
A British couple have spoken to the press about the 'nightmare' they have gone through since a mistake was made during treatment they received at a Leeds fertility clinic six years ago. This is the first time the couple have spoken publicly about their situation, despite...
to add a Comment.

By posting a comment you agree to abide by the BioNews terms and conditions

Syndicate this story - click here to enquire about using this story.