Page URL: https://www.bionews.org.uk/page_90101

Bush vetoes stem cell research bill

20 July 2006
Appeared in BioNews 368

US President George Bush has vetoed a bill passed by Congress that would have removed restrictions on federally-funded human embryonic stem cell (ES cell) research in America. The bill - known as the Stem Cell Research Enhancement Act of 2005 (HR 810) - was debated alongside two other bills dealing with issues in ES cell research on Monday and Tuesday of this week, and on Tuesday the Senate finally approved the measure by 63 votes to 37.

The bill had already been passed by the House of Representatives in May 2005, by 238 votes to 194, but ran out of time in the Senate last year and so was stalled until this week. It would have allowed federal funds to be used for research on ES cells derived from surplus embryos left over from fertility treatments and voluntarily donated by patients.

On 9 August 2001, Bush, who morally opposes any research that would involve the destruction of human embryos, announced that no federal funds would be available for researchers working on human ES cells created after that date. At the time it was estimated that 78 ES cell lines would be available to US researchers, but later evidence showed that the number actually available is closer to 20. Federal researchers have complained about the lack of ES cell lines available to them, as well as saying that the ones that are available will never be suitable for clinical applications as they have been grown using mouse 'feeder' cells. ES cell lines created since Bush's policy was put in place have not used mouse cells, and so are potentially better in terms of future research on humans and clinical trials. A number of US states have passed their own legislation allowing state funds to be used in research, including the creation of new cell lines.

Bush, however, pledged to veto the bill almost as soon as it had been passed by the House of Representatives last year - and this pledge has been restated at almost every turn since. In order to override a Presidential Veto there needed to be a two-thirds majority in each legislative chamber - something neither achieved, although the Senate vote on Tuesday only fell four votes short and, when the issue went back to the House after the Senate vote, there were 235 votes in favour of overturning the veto against 193. Opinion polls suggest that almost 70 per cent of Americans support ES cell research.

Following the Senate vote, there were press statements welcoming the outcome issued by a number of interested organisations: the Christopher Reeve Foundation, the American Diabetes Association, the Biotechnology Industry Association and the Juvenile Diabetes Research Foundation, among others. A number of Senators and other parties called on Bush not to use his power of veto. Former First Lady Nancy Reagan, who had campaigned in support of the bill, said that 'the pleas of so many suffering families have finally been heard', adding 'time is short, and life is precious, and I hope this promising research can now move forward'. However, on Wednesday evening, Bush issued the veto, the first since he came to power. 'This bill would support the taking of innocent human life in the hope of finding medical benefits for others. It crosses a moral boundary that our decent society needs to respect, so I vetoed it', he said. Privately-funded ES cell research is unaffected by the vote or the veto: it has always been permitted in the US.

Diana DeGette, co-sponsor of the legislation, said that she has 'no doubt' that the position will change 'in 30 months when we have a new president'. DeGette and Mike Castle, her co-sponsor, as well as others, plan to attach elements of the bill to other measures or bring the whole thing back next year. 'I'm energised by this, not quieted', Castle said.

The other two bills that were debated take different approaches to stem cell research - both were passed by the Senate on Tuesday. The first (S 2754), sponsored by Republican Senators Arlen Specter and Rick Santorum, requires the US National Institutes of Health (NIH) to research ways of creating ES cell lines without creating and destroying actual embryos, as well as increasing research into adult stem cells. The other (S 3504 - the Fetal Farming Prohibition Act), sponsored by Senators Rick Santorum and Sam Brownback, bans the use of embryos from 'fetal farms' in research - those that could be created in a non-human uterus or from human pregnancies created specifically for the purposes of research.

SOURCES & REFERENCES
Bush's Veto of Stem Cell Research Risky
ABC News |  20 July 2006
Bush turns back on science to veto stem cell Bill
The Daily Telegraph |  20 July 2006
Bush vetoes stem cell legislation - Backers don't muster votes for an override
San Francisco Chronicle |  20 July 2006
Bush vetoes stem cell research bill
The Boston Globe |  20 July 2006
RELATED ARTICLES FROM THE BIONEWS ARCHIVE
23 April 2007 - by Sam Berger and Professor Jonathan Moreno 
It appears that once again the US Congress will be unable to override President Bush's expected veto of legislation to loosen federal restrictions on human embryonic stem (ES) cell research. In light of this political stalemate, as well as efforts in states like California, New Jersey, and New York to...
17 April 2007 - by Antony Starza-Allen 
The Senate has passed two pieces of legislation designed to relax the restrictions on stem cell research in the US. It has approved a much-anticipated bill to ease current restrictions on human embryonic stem cell (ES) research, allowing for federal funding to be used for research on...
26 March 2007 - by Antony Starza-Allen 
The director of the US National Institutes of Health (NIH), Elias Zerhouni, has said that he supports the removal of the current restrictions on federal funding for human embryonic stem (ES) cell research imposed by President Bush in 2001. 'From my standpoint, it is clear today that...
15 January 2007 - by Antony Starza-Allen 
The US House of Representatives has voted in favour of legislation to expand federal funding for human embryonic stem (ES) cell research. The Stem Cell Research Enhancement Act 2007 was passed by 253 votes to 174, but fell short of the two-thirds majority needed to override a...
4 December 2006 - by Antony Starza-Allen 
In the US, the Democrats have indicated that they will push for a vote on stem cell legislation which would permit the allocation of federal funding for research, previously vetoed by President Bush. Senate Majority Leader-elect, Harry Reid, who will take control of the Senate's agenda when...
23 July 2006 - by Sean Tipton 
With unprecedented bipartisan support in the US House of Representatives, the US Senate, and from the American people, the Stem Cell Research Enhancement Act passed both houses of Congress and landed on President Bush's desk this week, only to be met with the first veto of the Bush Administration. President...
18 April 2006 - by BioNews 
Prospects of the US passing a federal bill in support of all forms of stem cell research seem to have stalled, with a busy legislative timetable and lack of agreement on the issues to blame. Last year, Congress seemed like it had successfully reopened the debate on stem cell research...
3 April 2006 - by BioNews 
The House of Delegates of the US state of Maryland has approved a bill that could bring as much as $15 million of state funding per year for stem cell research, making it the fourth US state to authorise the spending of public money on such research. The money will...
1 August 2005 - by BioNews 
Bill Frist, the US Senate Majority Leader, has added his support to legislation that would extend the provision of federal funding for human embryonic stem (ES) cell research in the US. Current policy, set by President Bush on 9 August 2001, only allows state funds to be used for research...
6 June 2005 - by BioNews 
The state legislature of Massachusetts, US, has overruled a veto of legislation on human embryonic stem (ES) cell research. The legislation, which was sponsored by Senate President Robert Travaglini, allows embryos to be cloned for medical research purposes, but prohibits human reproductive cloning. The Massachusetts House of Representatives passed the...
HAVE YOUR SAY
to add a Comment.

By posting a comment you agree to abide by the BioNews terms and conditions


Syndicate this story - click here to enquire about using this story.