Page URL:

US government urged to increase genetic test regulation

2 December 2005
By BioNews
Appeared in BioNews 337

The US Genetics and Public Policy Center has called for stronger federal oversight of genetic testing in the country. The move stems from concerns over the quality of some of the increasing number of genetic tests available to consumers. The centre, based at Johns Hopkins University, has written to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) to issue a proposed rule to create a genetic testing speciality under the Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments (CLIA) of 1988.

The CMS, part of the Department of Health and Human Services, is responsible for setting laboratory standards for other types of medical tests, such as those for blood sugar or HIV infection. In its letter to the CMS, Gail Javitt and Kathy Hudson of the Center note that 'for more than ten years, federal advisory committees have been calling upon the government to provide more oversight of genetic tests'. But despite accepting recommendations to improve oversight of genetic testing five years ago, the CMS has yet to act, the authors say.

A wide range of genetic tests are now available, most of which detect gene mutations associated with inherited disorders such as cystic fibrosis and Huntington's disease. But, according to Javitt, there are concerns about the accuracy of other tests being offered - such as one for determining the sex of a fetus, and one offered online for an 'addiction gene' that does not actually exist. She told the Baltimore Sun newspaper that she couldn't cite specific examples of inaccurate test results, since part of the difficulty is that there is no central government database for collecting such reports.

Industry groups say its members are already subject to sufficient oversight. Carolyn Jones, of the Advanced Medical Technology Association, said that most genetic testing is already governed by federal law, and overseen by either the CMS or the Food and Drug Administration. A spokesperson for the American Clinical Laboratory Association said that its members already follow strict ethical codes, but they would support 'some tweaking' of the rules to guard against inaccurate testing by non-members.

However, in their letter, Javitt and Hudson say that 'the absence of a specialty area for genetic testing with specifically tailored requirements for the now burgeoning genetic testing industry hampers CLIA's ability to oversee the quality of genetic testing and to adequately ensure its safety', adding 'we urge CMS to take urgent steps'. In a press release, Javitt concludes that 'it's time to move swiftly to protect the American public and publish a proposed rule'.

Genetics and Public Policy Center calls for stronger federal regulation of genetic testing, USA
Medical News Today |  1 December 2005
Letter to Mark McClellan, Administrator of the CMS
Genetics and Public Policy Centre |  28 November 2005
Surge in genetic testing raises quality concerns
The Baltimore Sun |  30 November 2005
27 April 2009 - by Ben Jones 
The UK's Nuffield Council on Bioethics, an independent group of experts, is launching a new inquiry into the growing - and largely unregulated - provision of medical services through the internet and by consumer-targeted businesses. The multi-disciplinary group of experts will look at patients' experience of services including DNA...
11 September 2006 - by Dr Jess Buxton 
The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) released two sets of draft guidelines relating to some types of diagnostic genetic tests last week. According to Kathy Hudson, director of the Genetics and Public Policy Center at Johns Hopkins University, the documents clarify the role of the...
30 January 2006 - by BioNews 
Scientists attending a meeting on genomics and public health in London last week criticised some genetic tests being sold directly to the public. According to a report in the Guardian newspaper, tests that claim to assess a person's risk of developing common illnesses - sold via the Internet or through chemists...
1 July 2005 - by BioNews 
A company in the United States has begun marketing a kit which allows women to discover the sex of their baby as early as five weeks into the pregnancy. Currently, expectant mothers can get a good idea of their baby's sex with a routine ultrasound at around 16 weeks, but...
14 April 2003 - by BioNews 
Most genetic tests that offer health information should not be sold directly to the public, the UK's human genetics watchdog recommended last week. In a new report entitled 'Genes direct: ensuring the effective oversight of genetic tests supplied directly to the public', the Human Genetics Commission (HGC) called for stricter...
11 April 2003 - by Philip Webb 
When people think of genetic testing in the medical context, they will most likely associate this with a visit to their GP or a referral by their GP to an NHS hospital. They would expect tests on their DNA to establish whether they are suffering from an inherited disorder or...
to add a Comment.

By posting a comment you agree to abide by the BioNews terms and conditions

Syndicate this story - click here to enquire about using this story.