Page URL: https://www.bionews.org.uk/page_89205

Embryo appeal begins

24 March 2004
By BioNews
Appeared in BioNews 251

Natallie Evans, one of two British women who was legally prevented from using embryos kept in frozen storage by the withdrawal of consent by her ex-partner, has started her appeal. In the latest stage of her continued fight to have her own biologically-related child, she is asking the UK's Court of Appeal to reverse an earlier decision that the embryos must be destroyed.

Last September, the UK High Court ruled against Natallie Evans and another woman, Lorraine Hadley, who had sought to use their embryos against a requirement of the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act 1990, which stipulates that consent from both parties is needed for continued storage or use of frozen embryos. Lorraine Hadley later decided not to continue with her case, apparently due to the withdrawal of her legal aid.

In October, Ms Evans asked the Court of Appeal to consider the merits of her application and to decide whether or not to give her permission to appeal. Three Court of Appeal judges agreed in January 2004 that her case raises important legal issues and so warrants a full rehearing.

Ms Evans is appealing the High Court decision of Mr Justice Wall on five grounds: first, that her former fiancé had consented to treatment together with her and intended for her to carry the embryos created with his sperm. Secondly, that the 1990 Act is wrong, if it allows consent to be withdrawn after the embryos have been created. Thirdly, that in any event, it is too late for consent to be withdrawn as, technically, the embryos have already been 'used' as part of Ms Evans' treatment. Fourthly, that she has a right to use the embryos as part of her human right to privacy and family life, guaranteed by Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR). Lastly, the law, by granting a 'male veto' over the use of the embryos, discriminates against her in breach of Article 14 of the ECHR. Robin Tolson QC, the barrister representing her, also told the court that if her husband had 'been entirely truthful' with her, 'their relationship would have ended before her ovaries were removed and she would have had treatment as a single woman'.

The appeal is being heard by Lord Justice Thorpe, Lord Justice Sedley and Lady Justice Arden. Lord Thorpe has announced that the judgement will be reserved until the end of April, while the three judges formulate their decision.

SOURCES & REFERENCES
A delicate case for the modern-day Solomons
The Times |  23 March 2004
Frozen Embryos Woman Launches IVF Appeal
The Scotsman |  23 March 2004
RELATED ARTICLES FROM THE BIONEWS ARCHIVE
25 June 2004 - by BioNews 
The UK's Court of Appeal has ruled that Natallie Evans cannot use the IVF embryos she created with her former partner. Natallie was one of two British women legally prevented, due to the withdrawal of consent by their ex-partners, from using embryos kept in frozen storage. The embryos represent her...
30 January 2004 - by Dr Kirsty Horsey 
Natallie Evans, one of two British women who was legally prevented from using embryos kept in frozen storage by the withdrawal of consent by her ex-partner, will have her case heard by the Court of Appeal on 23 and 24 March this year. In the latest stage of her continued...
29 October 2003 - by BioNews 
Natallie Evans, one of two British women currently prevented from using embryos kept in frozen storage by the withdrawal of consent by ex-partners, has announced that she will take her case to the Court of Appeal. The UK High Court ruled a month ago against Natallie Evans and Lorraine Hadley...
6 October 2003 - by Dr Kirsty Horsey 
While one might have sympathy for Natallie Evans and Lorraine Hadley because the UK's High Court has ruled they cannot use the embryos they have in frozen storage, it is hard to criticise the legal decision in this case. Mr Justice Wall followed the letter of the law on consent...
1 October 2003 - by BioNews 
The UK High Court has ruled today that Natallie Evans and Lorraine Hadley cannot use their stored frozen embryos without the consent of their former partners. The women appeared in the High Court in June this year, asking Mr Justice Wall to prevent the destruction of their stored embryos, created...
1 October 2003 - by Juliet Tizzard 
This week's BioNews reports on news that two women have lost a legal challenge to the use of their embryos without the consent of their former partners. Natallie Evans and Lorraine Hadley want to use the frozen embryos to try for their own babies even though their former partners - the...
HAVE YOUR SAY
to add a Comment.

By posting a comment you agree to abide by the BioNews terms and conditions


Syndicate this story - click here to enquire about using this story.