Page URL:

UN to revisit cloning in one year

10 December 2003
By BioNews
Appeared in BioNews 238

The United Nations will reconsider a treaty to ban human cloning in one year's time, rather than the two-year delay agreed upon by its legal committee recently. The General Assembly arrived at the consensus this week, following a last minute plan by supporters of a total ban on cloning technology to force a second vote on the issue. But on Tuesday morning, before going into session, delegates compromised, and decided to look at the issues again in 2004.

In November, the UN narrowly voted in favour of an Islamic nation-lead proposal to delay any decision on a cloning treaty until 2005. This meant that delegates did not vote on two other competing resolutions. One, sponsored by Costa Rica and supported by the United States and 64 other nations, sought a ban on both human reproductive and therapeutic cloning. The other, supported by 23 nations including the UK, proposed a ban on human reproductive cloning only, whilst allowing research cloning to continue. But supporters of the total cloning ban had decided to try and override the two-year delay, by opposing the proposal when it came up for a final vote this week.

Following an outcry from supporters of therapeutic cloning research (the proposed use of cloned early embryo cells to develop tissue-matched disease treatments), supporters of the Costa Rican proposal have now abandoned their push for a total ban. 'This is a victory for rational policy making and human science, especially for the coalition of groups who came together to oppose this', said Bernard Siegel, executive director of the Genetics Policy Institute. The GPI is a pressure group seeking to ban human reproductive cloning whilst promoting research into SCNT (somatic cell nuclear transfer) research (therapeutic cloning).

Opponents of SCNT say that it is unethical, because it involves the destruction of four-day old human embryos, whereas supporters say such research could lead to new treatments for a range of incurable diseases. 'It is clear that there is no consensus in respect to therapeutic cloning research', the UK's deputy ambassador Adam Thomson told the assembly this week. But, he added, those who supported the Costa Rican resolution had 'effectively destroyed' the possibility of a ban on human reproductive cloning, an issue upon which all countries were agreed. Thomson also said that the UK would never be party to any convention that attempted to ban therapeutic cloning, nor would it apply it in its national law. Richard Grenell, a spokesman for the US ambassador, said that the US position on human cloning has not changed, adding that 'we continue to work for a total ban'.

Global therapeutic cloning ban averted
New Scientist |  10 December 2003
UN balks at cloning ban
Wired News |  9 December 2003
UN delays work on human cloning treaty for a year
Reuters |  9 December 2003
U.N. to delay anti-cloning treaty talk
Associated Press |  9 December 2003
19 November 2007 - by Antony Starza-Allen 
The United Nation's Institute of Advanced Studies has issued a report containing a stark warning to the rest of the world: introduce global legislation to prohibit reproductive cloning or prepare to consider laws that protect cloned individuals from potential discrimination, prejudice and abuse. The report, entitled 'Is...
10 March 2005 - by BioNews 
The United Nations (UN) has adopted a non-binding declaration that prohibits 'all forms of human cloning inasmuch as they are incompatible with human dignity and the protection of human life'. The ban was passed by the general assembly on Tuesday, by 84 votes to 34 with 37 abstentions. Many countries...
21 February 2005 - by BioNews 
The United Nations (UN) has approved a declaration calling for a ban on human cloning for both reproductive and research purposes. The assembly's legal committee voted 71 to 35 in favour of the non-binding statement, backed by the Bush administration, with 43 abstentions. The declaration will now pass to the...
21 February 2005 - by Dr Jess Buxton 
In this week's BioNews, we report on the latest instalment in the ongoing saga of the United Nation (UN)'s deliberations on cloning. What started out, in 2001, as a proposed treaty to ban human reproductive cloning has ended up as a non-binding declaration calling on nations to ban all...
22 November 2004 - by BioNews 
The Legal Committee of the General Assembly of the United Nations (UN) last week abandoned proposals to adopt an international convention on human cloning. A proposal led by the US and Costa Rica, which would have meant an international treaty banning all forms of human cloning, including for medical research...
8 December 2003 - by BioNews 
Supporters of therapeutic cloning have attacked a proposal to force another UN vote on a world wide cloning ban, a vote that the UN General Assembly had already voted to delay for two years. Delegates voted a month ago to postpone any decision on a cloning resolution until 2005, by...
5 November 2003 - by BioNews 
The General Assembly of the United Nations (UN) has narrowly voted to postpone any decision on a global human cloning ban until 2005. Eighty countries voted in favour of the delay, with 79 voting against and 15 abstaining. This meant that delegates did not vote on two other competing cloning...
to add a Comment.

By posting a comment you agree to abide by the BioNews terms and conditions

Syndicate this story - click here to enquire about using this story.