Reproduction and Fertility is an open-access, peer-reviewed journal
Page URL: https://www.bionews.org.uk/page_87860

Regulatory body for Canada

17 May 1999
By BioNews
Appeared in BioNews 8

A federal body to regulate genetic and reproductive technologies is likely to be established in Canada this autumn. The federal Health Minister, Allan Rock, will table legislation to set up a licensing authority and to prohibit the same practices that an earlier bill attempted to outlaw in 1996.

The 1996 bill, known as C-47, died when an election was called the following year. The C-47 bill, which contained heavy penalties for infringement of various criminalised practices, was severely criticised at the time by doctors, ethicists and lawyers for not being flexible enough to regulate the everyday provision of new reproductive technologies.

Although no final decisions have been made, it is expected that Mr Rock's bill will propose to outlaw human cloning, payment to surrogate mothers, germ-line gene therapy, the creation of embryos for research purposes, payment to gamete donors, and various other practices.

Like the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority in the UK, the new regulatory body will issue licenses to centres offering fertility treatment and to scientists carrying out human embryo research, it is expected to have broad powers to revoke licenses from establishments that fall foul of the rules.

SOURCES & REFERENCES
Body to regulate genetic, reproductive technology
National Post |  11 May 1999
RELATED ARTICLES FROM THE BIONEWS ARCHIVE
23 May 2011 - by Sarah Pritchard 
Anonymous egg and sperm donation will no longer be permitted in British Columbia (BC), Canada, after a donor-conceived woman, Olivia Pratten, took the provincial government to court to argue that its adoption laws discriminated against individuals such as herself....
22 March 2010 - by MacKenna Roberts 
The Canadian ban against women selling their eggs as a source of eggs for fertility treatments is reported to be systemically flawed in practice, according to an expose article published in the April 2010 edition of the Canadian magazine The Walrus. Journalist Alison Motluk interviewed egg 'donors' and recipients, fertility experts and regulators, revealing that the Canadian ban is as farcical as its loose interpretation of the word 'donor'. The article attributed the discrepan...
HAVE YOUR SAY
to add a Comment.

By posting a comment you agree to abide by the BioNews terms and conditions


Syndicate this story - click here to enquire about using this story.