Page URL: https://www.bionews.org.uk/page_140643

UK surrogates call for immediate transfer of parenthood after birth

7 January 2019
Appeared in BioNews 981

Most surrogates think they should be able to claim reasonable expenses for carrying a child for someone else, a new report from Surrogacy UK has found. They also felt that legal parenthood should rest with the intended parents immediately after birth.

The survey was carried out by Kent Law School on behalf of Surrogacy UK's working group on surrogacy law reform. It found that 71 percent of surrogates either agreed or strongly agreed that they should be able to claim verifiable expenses for carrying a child. These results are timely, as the Law Commission is currently reviewing the laws around surrogacy.

In the UK, it is illegal to profit from surrogacy. However, this is an ongoing topic of debate, as many have called for the ban on payments to be lifted. Sir James Munby – the former president of the Family Division of the High Court of Justice – told the annual conference of the Progress Educational Trust, which publishes BioNews that it was time to give 'serious consideration to abolishing the restrictions on commercial surrogacy' (see BioNews 979).

There were 510 responses to the survey, from surrogates, partners of surrogates and intended parents. The aim of the report was to inform the review being undertaken by the Law Commission on surrogacy laws. The report concluded that 'evidence-based reform' of the law was 'necessary.'

At present, the surrogate is legally the mother of the child at birth and this only switches to the parents when a parental order is granted, often months after birth. In the survey, 84 percent of responders thought that this should change, and that legal parenthood should automatically rest with the intended parents at birth.  

Under the current regulations, altruistic surrogacy is legal in the UK but commercial surrogacy is illegal. This means that third parties cannot charge for surrogacy services – such as brokering arrangements – and a surrogate cannot claim for anything beyond expenses incurred. According to the survey results, most people feel that surrogates should be allowed to claim for reasonable expenses, but nothing more.

Dr Kirsty Horsey of Kent Law School, author of the report said: 'The survey proves that altruism remains the overwhelmingly favoured route among UK surrogates. We also saw that financial accessibility of surrogacy was a major concern for intended parents.'

There have been many debates in recent years on surrogacy law reform (see BioNews 882) . Research has shown that altruistic surrogacy is increasing in the UK.

Speaking to Surrogacy UK, Sarah Jones, who has been a surrogate for three different UK couples said: 'Surrogacy isn’t a job. We do it because we are passionate about making families, not money. Being paid anything more than expenses would change the relationship we have with the parents and would put most surrogates off doing it.'

It was announced in 2017 that the Law Commission would review surrogacy law and the consultation paper is due to be presented in the spring of 2019.

SOURCES & REFERENCES
Most surrogates want to give up their parental rights from birth, reveals survey
Daily Mail |  31 December 2018
Surrogates do not support calls for commercial surrogacy in the UK
Surrogacy UK |  31 December 2018
RELATED ARTICLES FROM THE BIONEWS ARCHIVE
8 April 2019 - by Antony Starza-Allen 
After many years of debate, surrogacy law reform is finally on the move. The Law Commissions of England and Wales, and that of Scotland, are now jointly evaluating areas of surrogacy law that have been identified as needing reform, with a view to making recommendations to Government in 2021...
17 December 2018 - by Georgia Everett 
A new study into the experience of British families who undertaking surrogacy arrangements has shed light on the reasons some seek a surrogate in the UK while others choose to go abroad...
1 October 2018 - by Jennifer Willows 
At the Royal Society of Edinburgh, on 27 September 2018, the Progress Educational Trust (PET) held its public event 'Modern Surrogacy Needs a Modern Law: How Should We Regulate Surrogacy in the 21st Century?'...
2 October 2017 - by Andrew Powell 
A recent case is noteworthy not only for clinical negligence lawyers but also those interested in surrogacy and the wider public policy debate in the UK...
19 December 2016 - by Ryan Ross 
The government has welcomed a House of Lords debate on surrogacy law reform, promising to consider whether the statute needs to be updated...
HAVE YOUR SAY
Log in to add a Comment.

By posting a comment you agree to abide by the BioNews terms and conditions


Syndicate this story - click here to enquire about using this story.