Subscribe to the BioNews newsletter for free

Advanced Search

Search for

Like the Progress Educational Trust on Facebook



Australian surrogate banned from child's life after bitter legal feud

23 October 2017

By Dr Mary Yarwood

Appeared in BioNews 923

A surrogate from Queensland, Australia has had her parental rights removed after a judge decided it was in the baby's best interests.

Relations between the intended parents and the surrogate deteriorated during the pregnancy to such an extent that the surrogate threatened to have a termination. In the Family Court proceedings, it was claimed that the surrogate told her counsellor that she regretted the pregnancy and had thought 'of using a coat hanger to induce abortion'.

The disputes between the parties were mainly financial. The intended parents (who are the child's biological parents) claimed that the surrogate was using the unborn baby to 'extort money' and that she had complained to her counsellor that 'other surrogates are showered with gifts'. The surrogate, who is a relative of one of the couple, claimed that they were late with some agreed payments, and that other payments failed to arrive.

Commercial surrogacy is illegal in Queensland, but intended parents can pay a surrogate's 'reasonable expenses'. Surrogacy agreements are not legally binding: under Queensland law the birth mother is always the legal parent of the child. A Parentage Order needs to be made by a Court to transfer parental rights and responsibilities to the intended parents, and until this is issued either party may back out.

In his judgment, Justice Peter Tree said that the surrogate's erratic behaviour and desire to punish the intended parents led him to conclude that it was in the child's best interest for the intended parents to have shared parental responsibility, with sole responsibility 'for [his] daily care, welfare and development.'

Documents submitted to the court showed that the surrogate had instructed her solicitors to write to the couple two weeks before the birth in a way that 'implicitly threatened on behalf of the surrogate that she would neither hand over the child to the genetic parents after it was born, nor consent to a parenting order being made in their favour'.

The baby was born in April 2016 and taken to live with the intended parents. In August 2016 the surrogate's solicitors sought payment of $21,351.59 from the intended parents in order 'to move the matter to a parentage order.'

A surrogacy report compiled for the court case quoted the surrogate as saying 'even now I want to have [the child] back and put him up for adoption. [The intended parents'] behaviour has been really disgusting.' The surrogate also sent a text message to the report writer stating that she wanted shared custody of her legal son, and that she wanted to put him up for adoption.


18 December 2017 - by Sean Byrne 
Congressman Trent Franks has resigned from the US House of Representatives, following claims of misconduct related to pursuing a surrogacy arrangement with a former staffer...
13 November 2017 - by Sean Byrne 
A woman has been denied legal parenthood of her surrogate-born child because she is single, despite being the genetic mother...
06 November 2017 - by Antony Blackburn-Starza 
A US surrogate has been united with her genetic child who she carried alongside the intended parents' embryo in an apparent case of superfetation... 

10 April 2017 - by Jennifer Willows 
A decision granting custody of a baby to a surrogate has been upheld by the Court of Appeal...
28 November 2016 - by Antony Blackburn-Starza 
A surrogate who lost a legal battle to keep her child has been granted supervised contact by the Family Court, although her attempt to regain custody has failed...
07 November 2016 - by Antony Blackburn-Starza 
A surrogate has refused to give her consent for the parents of twins to become the children's legal parents, even though she and her husband are not seeking any active involvement in the children's upbringing...
04 July 2016 - by Antony Blackburn-Starza 
A surrogate has been allowed to keep a baby after refusing to hand the child over to the intended parents after birth...
13 June 2016 - by Stephen Page 
A parliamentary inquiry into surrogacy laws in Australia has just reported its recommendations, but they don't go far enough and the country is likely to remain the world's largest exporters of intended parents...

Be the first to have your say.

You need to or  to add comments.

By posting a comment you agree to abide by the BioNews terms and conditions

- click here to enquire about using this story.

Published by the Progress Educational Trust


Public Conference
8 December 2017

Speakers include

Professor Azim Surani

Professor Magdalena Zernicka-Goetz

Professor Robin Lovell-Badge

Sally Cheshire

Professor Guido Pennings

Katherine Littler

Professor Allan Pacey

Dr Sue Avery

Professor Richard Anderson

Dr Elizabeth Garner

Dr Andy Greenfield

Dr Anna Smajdor

Dr Henry Malter

Vivienne Parry

Dr Helen O'Neill

Dr César Palacios-González

Philippa Taylor

Fiona Fox

Sarah Norcross

Sandy Starr


Good Fundraising Code

Become a Friend of PET HERE and give the Progress Educational Trust a regular donation