Subscribe to the BioNews newsletter for free

Login
Advanced Search

Search for
BioNews

Like the Progress Educational Trust on Facebook


The Fertility Show


 

Event Review: Nature, Nurture or Neither? The View from the Genes

06 December 2010

By Harriet Vickers

Appeared in BioNews 587

Nature, Nurture or Neither? The View from the Genes

Organised by the Natural History Museum

Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, London SW7 5BD, UK

Monday 29 November 2010

'Nature, Nurture or Neither? The View from the Genes', organised by the Natural History Museum, Monday 29 November 2010


Overweight families have overweight cats, Detroit has a higher murder rate than the UK and a flock of goldfinches is called a charm. All these effects are evidently mainly environmental. They're caused by overfeeding, more gangs and guns, and the standard and focus of education, respectively. But Steve Jones, professor of genetics at University College London, UK, argued last week these factors are often overlooked because of our obsession with genetics.

In an annual lecture at London's Natural History Museum on 'nature -vs- nurture', Professor Jones emphasised the impact of genetics. Medical advances mean our lives are no longer most threatened by 'outside' causes, such as tuberculosis, cholera and influenza. Instead, he said, we're imperilled by conditions with strong genetic components, such as cancer, diabetes and heart disease.

Scientific knowledge of our genomes has promised much for our understanding of human behaviour and health. As Professor Jones put it: 'are people sick or well, geniuses or criminals, happy or sad, sane or bad because of their DNA?' But, he cautioned, geneticists have historically been overconfident about what the science can tell us. After On the Origin of Species was published, Francis Galton became convinced that abilities such as beauty, criminality and 'eminence' were biologically inherited and proposed eugenics to improve the population.

The importance attached to genes continues today: a Google search for 'scientists find the gene for' returned 36,000 hits. 'For', Professor Jones said, 'is the most dangerous word in genetics. The fact that something is inherited is absolutely not an indication that it is genetic'. Prince Harry inherited distinctive ears from his father, but Prince William will inherit the crown.

Obesity was Professor Jones' first example of where inheritance has been muddled. This condition runs in families. So is there a genetic component? One gene mutant is known to cause obesity: it curtails the production of leptin, a hormone which works in the brain to inhibit appetite. One in around 30,000 children are born with this condition and don't know when to stop eating. Studies have also shown identical twins who are told to eat as much as they can put on the same amount of weight, again showing genes are working in the brain.

Since then, more genes have been found that indicate if someone if likely to be overweight. But these have small, cumulative effects. 'It is genetic but it's a behavioural phenomenon, it's an appetite phenomenon', said Professor Jones. 'If someone is well educated and aware of the dangers of eating junk food then the gene would be much less of a problem than in a poorly-educated population'. Overweight parents may be more likely to have overweight children, but they're also more likely to have overweight cats. 'DNA runs in families, but so do frying pans', he added.

Criminality was his second example. Genes have been shown to influence the production of monoamine oxidase A, an enzyme which mediates response to fear. Around one third of the population have a low-activity form of the gene, meaning they have less of a reaction to scary events. 'So maybe your response to fear and to other emotions is to a degree controlled by that particular gene variant', said Professor Jones. 'The evidence isn't great but it's there, it's possible'.

However, another genetically-controlled substance also indicates criminality, he said - testosterone. Men murder around ten times as much as women and this peaks in the mid-twenties. The pattern is the same worldwide: in Detroit and the UK, for example. But in Detroit, the rate is 1,100 murders per million people; in the UK, 25 per million. Perhaps this is due to guns, drugs, gangs and poverty - all environmental.

And the charm? 'What is a flock of goldfinches called?' was a question in the 11+ test, the national exam meant to siphon off the most intelligent to a higher level of secondary education. But for this question to be a test of memory, children need to have learned the answer already. As Professor Jones put it, 'this was a 'gene for' test rather than a genetic one'.

Obesity, criminality and intelligence are complex issues, showing the tension between genes and environment. 'Nature -vs- nurture is in many ways a non-argument', concluded Professor Jones. 'It doesn't have the answers or the solutions - it just poses the problem in a different way'.

SOURCES & REFERENCES
Natural History Museum | 29 November 2010
 

RELATED ARTICLES FROM THE BIONEWS ARCHIVE

01 June 2015 - by Ceri Durham 
Researchers studying thousands of human traits have concluded that, overall, they are influenced equally by genetic and environmental factors...
16 September 2013 - by Dr Linda Wijlaars 
It might seem a bit simplistic to start a review of a debate with the dictionary definition, but after watching Professor Tim Spector's and Dr Helena Cronin's debate on the new science of gender, I just had to go back and check....
30 August 2011 - by Dr Zara Mahmoud 
Scientists have suggested there may be a genetic basis behind the way our body reacts to the flu virus, making some of us more vulnerable than others. A study published in PLoS Genetics has tracked the body's response to the H3N2/Wisconsin strain of the flu virus at the genetic level. The researchers injected the virus into 17 volunteers and analysed expression patterns from the time of injection to the onset of full-blown clinical symptoms...
26 August 2011 - by Aaron Parkhurst 
Philosopher Langdon Winner rather poetically refers to scientific public engagement as 'technological somnambulism'. The image he invokes is that of a vast network of societal sleepwalking; interacting but not engaging. This is especially true within a biomedical context. Whenever an inventive entity creates novel technologies, he or she inspires and develops two important constructs. The first is the physical instrument, or perhaps something less concrete, such as an idea or methodology...
18 July 2011 - by Chris Chatterton 
Scottish scientists have identified a genetic region that may have a role to play in why humans crave 'fatty foods'. The researchers, from Aberdeen University, identified a DNA region close to the galanin (GAL) gene that helps to regulate the production of this protein...

HAVE YOUR SAY
Be the first to have your say.

You need to or  to add comments.

By posting a comment you agree to abide by the BioNews terms and conditions


- click here to enquire about using this story.

Published by the Progress Educational Trust

CROSSING FRONTIERS

Moving the Boundaries of Human Reproduction

Public Conference
London
8 December 2017

Speakers include

Professor Azim Surani

Professor Magdalena Zernicka-Goetz

Professor Robin Lovell-Badge

Sally Cheshire

Professor Guido Pennings

Katherine Littler

Professor Allan Pacey

Dr Sue Avery

Professor Richard Anderson

Dr Elizabeth Garner

Dr Jacques Cohen

Dr Anna Smajdor

Dr Andy Greenfield

Vivienne Parry

Dr Helen O'Neill

Dr César Palacios-González

Philippa Taylor

Fiona Fox

Sarah Norcross


BOOK HERE

Good Fundraising Code

Become a Friend of PET HERE and give the Progress Educational Trust a regular donation