Subscribe to the BioNews newsletter for free

Login
Advanced Search

Search for
BioNews

Like the Progress Educational Trust on Facebook


 


 

Science 'express concern' over publication of 'flawed' longevity gene paper

06 December 2010

By Owen Clark

Appeared in BioNews 587

Serious doubts have been raised over the validity of a study on the genetic basis of longevity published in the journal Science.

The article, published in the 1 July 2010 issue of Science, claimed to have identified a number of common genetic variants that were predictive of whether people would live to over 100. Now the editors of Science have published an 'expression of concern' in the 12 November issue, citing technical concerns from other researchers which call into question the validity of the published findings.

In the original paper by Dr Thomas Perls and Professor Paola Sebastiani and others from Boston University, the researchers conducted a genome-wide association study (GWAS) that compared genomic sequences from 1,055 individuals of 'exceptional longevity' (those who had lived to be over 100) with 1,267 control individuals.

They found that 'exceptional longevity' could be predicted with 77 percent accuracy in an independent set of centenarians, using a genetic model the researchers had developed that was based on 150 SNPs (single nucleotide polymorphisms) - minor alterations in the sequence of genetic material that occur within populations.

However, since the findings were published it has been suggested that the genotyping platforms used to produce the data in the study, and lack of quality-control measures in the data analysis, may have led to several false-positives being reported. One particular platform and 'gene chip' (610-quad array) used in the study, for example, was found to produce experimental errors in other unpublished studies.

Since these concerns were raised the researchers have re-analysed the data using improved quality-control measures, and obtained new results for the same set of individuals using more established platforms, as well as using an alternative method to validate the results from the original genotyping. The journal has agreed to review the study again, taking into account the new data and will then decide whether to support the original findings.

Dr Pearls a co-author of the original study told the Independent: 'We've taken the letter of concern very seriously and done a lot of work to produce a clean, validated set of data, and we've been in the process of re-performing the analyses with this clean data set'.

The journal Science will then decide whether to accept the original paper, republish a corrected version, or retract it entirely, by the end of the year.

SOURCES & REFERENCES
The Independent | 19 November 2010
 
Science | 12 November 2010
 
Science | 01 July 2010
 

RELATED ARTICLES FROM THE BIONEWS ARCHIVE

31 October 2011 - by James Brooks 
A $10 million prize is on offer for the first laboratory to accurately and economically sequence the genomes of 100 people over 100 years old. The Archon Genomics X Prize was originally founded in 2006 and has been modified so that entrants will now race to decode the centenarians' DNA...
25 July 2011 - by Dr Lux Fatimathas 
The journal Science has retracted a controversial paper on the genetics of extreme longevity by scientists at Boston University. The paper, released online last year, was retracted before publication in print following a formal ‘expression of concern’ regarding fundamental technical flaws....
16 May 2011 - by Dr Lux Fatimathas 
US researchers claim women who give birth to twins live longer than those who give birth to single babies. They speculate that the ability to successfully birth twins reflects a general biological robustness in the health of these women. A twin pregnancy is known to be more taxing on the mother's body and therefore was not thought to be biologically advantageous....
18 April 2011 - by Dr Nadeem Shaikh 
A research team from King's College London led by Dr Guangju Zhai has completed a meta-analysis of seven genetic studies looking at the role of the hormone, dehydroepiandrosterone sulphate (DHEAS), and how it may affect the ageing process in humans...

12 July 2010 - by Chris Chatterton 
Last week, BioNews reported on a study published in Science that claimed to have identified several gene clusters associated with longevity. The study drew significant media interest but, following the paper's publication, experts have raised concerns about the data...
05 July 2010 - by Chris Chatterton 
Stories about a genetic test to see if you would live to 100 abounded in the UK press last week. Was this hype or something more? The stories arose following the publication of a paper in Science where researchers claimed to have identified regions of the genome linked to exceptional longevity...
24 May 2010 - by Dr Tamara Hirsch 
Scientists have identified several genetic variants linked to living a long life. The right 'suite' of so-called 'Methuselah' genes could offset the ill effects of smoking, drinking and poor diet, the new research shows....
09 February 2009 - by Rosie Beauchamp 
A new study has found that the gene FOXO3A, previously linked to longevity in Japanese people, plays a similar role in Europeans who live to100 and beyond. The research, carried out at the Christian-Albrechts-University (CAU) in Kiel, compared DNA samples from 388 Germans aged 100 and over...
17 March 2008 - by Dr Jess Buxton 
Several of the genes that influence lifespan in a type of worm do the same job in yeast, say US researchers, suggesting that they may also be involved in human ageing. A team based at the University of Washington in Seattle has discovered that 25 of...

HAVE YOUR SAY
Be the first to have your say.

You need to or  to add comments.

By posting a comment you agree to abide by the BioNews terms and conditions


- click here to enquire about using this story.

Published by the Progress Educational Trust

CROSSING FRONTIERS

Public Conference
London
8 December 2017

Speakers include

Professor Azim Surani

Professor Magdalena Zernicka-Goetz

Professor Robin Lovell-Badge

Sally Cheshire

Professor Guido Pennings

Katherine Littler

Professor Allan Pacey

Dr Sue Avery

Professor Richard Anderson

Dr Elizabeth Garner

Dr Andy Greenfield

Dr Anna Smajdor

Dr Henry Malter

Vivienne Parry

Dr Helen O'Neill

Dr César Palacios-González

Philippa Taylor

Fiona Fox

Sarah Norcross

Sandy Starr


BOOK HERE

Good Fundraising Code

Become a Friend of PET HERE and give the Progress Educational Trust a regular donation