Subscribe to the BioNews newsletter for free

Login
Advanced Search

Search for
BioNews

Like the Progress Educational Trust on Facebook


Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis: The Who, the What, the Why and the How


 

Embryos from overseas couples 'stuck' in India

24 October 2016

By Lucas Taylor

Appeared in BioNews 874

Two US couples have filed a petition at the High Court of Bombay to reclaim embryos they transferred into the country before India's ban on international surrogacy arrangements was introduced last year.

In November 2015, the Indian Ministry of Health and Family Welfare issued a circular to prohibit the use of Indian surrogates by foreign nationals and the import or export of embryos. Since then, many couples who had started the surrogacy process before the new policy was published – including one UK and two US couples – have been prevented from shipping their embryos out of India.

The petitioners' lawyer, Ashutosh Kumbhankoni, argued: 'These are our embryos … We had brought them to India in accordance with the law of this country. Now that surrogacy is banned in India, we want to take them back.'

One of the couples bringing the petition had eight embryos prepared in the US and shipped to a hospital in Powai, India, in April 2015 for surrogacy. However, citing a draft bill prohibiting international and commercial surrogacy arrangements that was introduced by the Indian government last August (see BioNews 866), the hospital has now refused to return the embryos, reports The Indian Express.

Dr Duru Shah, a fertility doctor in Mumbai, explained that since the bill was announced fertility clinics in India have been complying with the November 2015 policy and refusing to return embryos to foreign nationals because they still 'do not know what [the bill] says on import and export'.

The Narendra Modi government says that it introduced the ban because fertility treatment centres had failed to protect surrogates from exploitative practices. India has gained a reputation among some for becoming a hub of commercial surrogacy arrangements because of the relatively low costs compared with fertility treatment in the US and Europe.

Rekha Patel, who is campaigning against the ban, criticised the move saying that 'policymakers simply do not understand what surrogacy is and how it works' and asks why a situation which benefits both surrogates and commissioning couples should be banned.

'Many surrogates have been robbed of their chance of a better life and are devastated. Many couples were part way through their treatment and had to stop,' she told the Hindustan Times.

The High Court is due to hear the case on 26 October. In the meantime, the presiding judge, Justice Shantanu Kemkar, has asked the petitioners to add the Director General of Foreign Trade to the proceedings given the issue of exportation in the case.

The court has also asked the Indian government to 'take a humanitarian stand' and to 'apply their mind' to resolve the issue. Kumbhankoni argues that, since the couple had received the necessary permission to transfer their embryos into India, their return is 'not [an] export but merely restoration'. But he adds that the ban has led to uncertainty concerning how to deal with foreign embryos brought into India.

SOURCES & REFERENCES
The Asian Age | 19 October 2016
 
The Indian Express | 20 October 2016
 
Hindustan Times | 15 October 2016
 
The Indian Express | 19 October 2016
 
Hindustan Times | 18 October 2016
 

RELATED ARTICLES FROM THE BIONEWS ARCHIVE

14 August 2017 - by Julianna Photopoulos 
A number of liberal reforms to the Surrogacy Regulation Bill 2016 have been proposed by India's parliamentary Standing Committee on Health and Family Welfare...
28 November 2016 - by Ryan Ross 
A fertility nurse in Cambodia has been arrested for her involvement in the commercial surrogacy industry, following a recent crackdown by authorities...
14 November 2016 - by Antony Blackburn-Starza 
The Irish High Court will hear a case in January to determine the legal status of a child born through an international surrogacy arrangement to whom the intended parents have no genetic connection...

19 September 2016 - by Rikita Patel 
The Indian foreign minister has intervened on social media in the case of a British couple who face having to leave the country without their surrogate-born child...
30 August 2016 - by Julianna Photopoulos 
The Indian government is considering a bill to ban commercial surrogacy, which will only allow Indian couples married for at least five years to use surrogacy.
20 June 2016 - by Ëlo Luik 
Discounted Life is a captivating look into the lives of the women who constituted the production line of India's surrogacy industry at a time when it was still legal and booming...
16 May 2016 - by Ryan Ross 
A same-sex couple have won a custody battle in Thailand against their surrogate after she allegedly refused to allow them to leave the country with their baby because they were not 'an ordinary couple'...
01 September 2015 - by Ana Ilic 
An injunction has been issued in Nepal to stop women from carrying surrogate pregnancies on behalf of foreigners...

HAVE YOUR SAY
Be the first to have your say.

You need to or  to add comments.

By posting a comment you agree to abide by the BioNews terms and conditions


- click here to enquire about using this story.

Published by the Progress Educational Trust

CROSSING FRONTIERS

Moving the Boundaries of Human Reproduction

Public Conference
London
8 December 2017

Speakers include

Professor Azim Surani

Professor Robin Lovell-Badge

Sally Cheshire

Professor Guido Pennings

Katherine Littler

Professor Richard Anderson

Dr Sue Avery

Dr Elizabeth Garner

Professor Allan Pacey

Dr Anna Smajdor

Dr Andy Greenfield

Philippa Taylor

Dr César Palacios-González

Fiona Fox

Sarah Norcross

EARLY BIRD DISCOUNT
if you book now


BOOK HERE

Good Fundraising Code

Become a Friend of PET HERE and give the Progress Educational Trust a regular donation