Subscribe to the BioNews newsletter for free

Login
Advanced Search

Search for
BioNews

Like the Progress Educational Trust on Facebook



 

Canadian fertility doctor sued over sperm mix-up claims

20 September 2010

By Ben Jones

Appeared in BioNews 576

A Canadian doctor is being sued by two of his patients who discovered their children were not genetically related to the believed donors, reports the Canadian newspaper The Globe and Mail. Dr Bernard Barwin, a specialist in reproductive medicine with almost 30 years' experience, is being accused of negligence after two patients at the Barwin Fertility Clinic in Ottawa found their children were unrelated to their intended fathers.

Two separate legal challenges have been filed against the doctor. The first is by Ms Jacqueline Slinn, a mother who discovered in April her five-year-old daughter Bridget was not conceived using the sperm from the donor she had selected. After treatment in 2003 and again in 2004 using several vials of sperm thought to belong to a donor identified as No. 3168, Ms Slinn became pregnant and gave birth in March 2005. In 2008, however, Ms Slinn sought to join a registry that could match Bridget to other children born through the use of 3168's sperm. At this time, genetic testing revealed Bridget was unrelated to other children conceived using samples from 3168.

Testing on the sperm purchased through Dr Barwin's clinic, purchased originally from Repromed, is alleged to demonstrate contamination of sperm from another, as yet unknown, source. Ms Slinn has told the Canadian media she was unaware of any risk of such an error and, over the intervening years, she had: 'carried on merrily thinking [the father] was 3168'.

The second suit filed is by Mr Matthew Guest and Ms Trudy Moore, a couple who received fertility treatment from Dr Barwin in March 2007. Mr Guest provided sperm to be artificially inseminated using a surrogate, Ms Moore's sister. The surrogate gave birth in late December 2007, but hospital tests identified the baby, Samantha, had RH (rhesus)-positive blood while the father and surrogate were both RH-negative. A 2008 genetic test ruled out Mr Guest as the father.

Ms Moore has said in an interview her family's major concern is not knowing Samantha's medical history. 'She may never care, but if she does I can't fix that. As a parent we want the best for our children, we want to protect our children, we want to fix things for our children. This is something I will never be able to give her', she said.

Both families are being represented by Ottawa law firm Nelligan O'Brien Payne who says it is investigating whether problems are more widespread at the clinic. Ms Slinn is seeking $1.25 million in damages, while Mr Guest and Ms Moore are seeking $1.75 million from Dr Barwin.

SOURCES & REFERENCES
The Globe and Mail | 11 September 2010
 
canoe.ca | 10 September 2010
 

RELATED ARTICLES FROM THE BIONEWS ARCHIVE

15 November 2010 - by Ken Hanscombe 
A new IVF technique developed in Australia offers hope to couples who have problems conceiving due to damaged sperm. The technique called Digital High-Mag allows fertility experts to study sperm cells at much higher resolution than before, enabling them to more readily detect those cells most likely to lead to a successful conception and full-term pregnancy....
08 November 2010 - by Nisha Satkunarajah 
A private medical centre in Singapore is under investigation after a mix-up during IVF treatment resulted in the birth of a child conceived with the wrong sperm....

28 September 2009 - by Ailsa Stevens 
A woman from the US has given birth to another couple's baby after being implanted with the wrong embryo during her IVF treatment. Caroline Savage and her husband, Sean found out about the mistake when the clinic rang Mr Savage in February. But rather than abort the pregnancy, as the clinic suggested, the couple have elected to give the child back to its biological parents after the birth....
12 May 2009 - by BioNews 
Last week BioNews reported that, speaking to The Sunday Times, an HFEA spokesperson said that mistakes due to human error only occur in 0.5 per cent of cases. BioNews has since been informed by the HFEA that this figure was misquoted in the newspaper, and that the true figure for...
03 May 2009 - by Dr Nadeem Shaikh 
Three couples undergoing IVF treatment at Guy's and St Thomas' Hospital, London, have had to have their embryos destroyed after the clinic used sperm from the wrong donor to fertilise the eggs. A spokesman for the clinic said that 'We identified potential problems with the eggs and...

HAVE YOUR SAY
Be the first to have your say.

You need to or  to add comments.

By posting a comment you agree to abide by the BioNews terms and conditions


- click here to enquire about using this story.

Published by the Progress Educational Trust

CROSSING FRONTIERS

Public Conference
London
8 December 2017

Speakers include

Professor Azim Surani

Professor Magdalena Zernicka-Goetz

Professor Robin Lovell-Badge

Sally Cheshire

Professor Guido Pennings

Katherine Littler

Professor Allan Pacey

Dr Sue Avery

Professor Richard Anderson

Dr Elizabeth Garner

Dr Andy Greenfield

Dr Anna Smajdor

Dr Henry Malter

Vivienne Parry

Dr Helen O'Neill

Dr César Palacios-González

Philippa Taylor

Fiona Fox

Sarah Norcross

Sandy Starr


BOOK HERE

Good Fundraising Code

Become a Friend of PET HERE and give the Progress Educational Trust a regular donation