Subscribe to the BioNews newsletter for free

Login
Advanced Search

Search for
BioNews

Like the Progress Educational Trust on Facebook




 

Woman who adopted child after consent error is given legal parenthood

19 September 2016

By Antony Blackburn-Starza

Appeared in BioNews 869

A woman who adopted her child, after being told that an administrative error during fertility treatment meant that her legal parental status was in doubt, has been granted legal parenthood by the Family Court.

The woman's partner, X, underwent IUI at St Bartholomew's Hospital Centre for Reproductive Medicine in London and gave birth to their child. The couple then entered into a civil partnership and the non-birth mother, known as Y, gave birth herself to the couple's second child, also by IUI.

Some years later the couple was informed by the clinic that it had lost or mislaid two consent forms, which recorded Y's consent to treatment, putting her legal parenthood over the first child – as the non-birth mother – in doubt. By virtue of being the birth mother, X was considered to be the first child's legal parent.

'When I received that telephone call I felt like my whole world had been ripped apart. I was no longer [the child's] mummy. This still remains very raw,' Y said in her witness statement.

In making a declaration of legal parenthood in Y's favour, Sir James Munby, President of the Family Division, said it was clear in the circumstances that both women had in fact given their consent. However, the matter was further complicated by the fact that when informed of the error, the couple were told that the only solution was for Y to adopt her own child – a view shared by the HFEA and many clinics and lawyers at the time. The woman made an adoption application which was granted, but the process was described as feeling 'wrong' by the couple.

'I felt I was stared at and judged. I felt that everyone analysed us,' Y said.  'We tried our hardest to do things properly and yet it's like I no longer feel like I am [the child's] mummy. I was [the child's] mummy but now I am [the child's] adoptive mummy.'

Finding that he was able to revoke the adoption order given the unprecedented circumstances – Y was 'in fact and in law' already the child's mother – Lord Justice Munby said he understood that the couple found the adoption process 'very intrusive, very hurtful and a total invasion of their privacy'.

The couple also wanted to ensure that the child's birth certificate would not indicate that the child had been adopted. 'It broke my heart when I had to hand in [the child's] original birth certificate. I am so upset that [the child] now has a different status as an adopted child. [The child] is now different to [their sibling], when [this] should not have been,' Y told the court.

Confirming that the child's birth records would not refer to adoption, the court also returned the original birth certificate – which was unmarked – to the couple.

'I propose to direct that it be handed back to X and Y. It is for them, as also for [the child], a most important document, with, for them, a human, personal and emotional significance which far transcends its purely legal importance,' Lord Justice Munby said.

Meanwhile, Lord Justice Munby also ruled in another consent case heard recently that a woman was not the legal parent of a child, as sought by the parties concerned, because of 'anomalies' in the clinic's paperwork. The couple's relationship had broken down since the child's birth.

On Monday 17 October 2016, the Progress Educational Trust is holding a free-to-attend evening event in London - entitled 'Birth Certificates and Assisted Reproduction: Setting the Record Straight?' - about the purpose and content of birth certificates in light of developments in science, medicine, law and society.

Click here for further details, and email to book your free place.

RELATED ARTICLES FROM THE BIONEWS ARCHIVE

18 December 2017 - by Georgia Everett 
A woman has asked the Hawaii Supreme Court to overturn a ruling denying her request to sever parental rights to a child born to her ex-wife...
13 November 2017 - by Sean Byrne 
A woman has been denied legal parenthood of her surrogate-born child because she is single, despite being the genetic mother...
13 February 2017 - by Dr Alice Margaria 
It is not the first time that a court has been called to rule on the recognition of family ties established between a male couple and their twins born from surrogacy abroad. But the recent ruling of the Court of Appeal of Milan has attracted particular interest because of its absurd consequences...
26 September 2016 - by Antony Blackburn-Starza 
An Australian woman has been wrongly listed as the biological mother of a child born following IVF treatment...
26 September 2016 - by Anest Mathias 
In April 2009 the parenthood provisions of the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act 2008 came into force. This governs parenthood following the use of donor gametes, including sperm...

22 August 2016 - by Antony Blackburn-Starza 
A High Court judge has questioned aspects of the consent process for fertility treatment in a ruling in which he made a declaration of parentage in respect of a child born following IVF...
18 April 2016 - by Cait McDonagh 
A clerical mistake at a Sheffield IVF clinic meant that a father's status as his child's legal parent was put in doubt...
11 April 2016 - by Antony Blackburn-Starza 
The President of the Family Division, Sir James Munby, has criticised as 'insensitive' the handling of a claim brought by the biological mother of twins who was the victim of an administrative error at a fertility clinic...
21 September 2015 - by Andrew Berkley 
There is no excuse for the administrative incompetence of fertility clinics that has resulted in legal parenthood uncertainty for at least 84 couples, but are medical providers the ideal professionals to seek consent for legal parenthood?...
14 September 2015 - by Antony Blackburn-Starza 
The President of the Family Division, Sir James Munby, has spoken of 'widespread incompetence' in the fertility sector and has questioned the adequacy of the regulatory framework overseen by the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority...

HAVE YOUR SAY
Be the first to have your say.

You need to or  to add comments.

By posting a comment you agree to abide by the BioNews terms and conditions


- click here to enquire about using this story.

Published by the Progress Educational Trust
Advertise your products and services HERE - click for further details

Good Fundraising Code

Become a Friend of PET HERE and give the Progress Educational Trust a regular donation