Subscribe to the BioNews newsletter for free

Login
Advanced Search

Search for
BioNews

Like the Progress Educational Trust on Facebook


 


 

Blurred boundaries – the language of DNA

08 August 2016

By Professor Marcus Pembrey

Emeritus Professor of Paediatric Genetics, Institute of Child Health, University College London

Appeared in BioNews 863

Over the last two decades developments in genetics, and more recently in the science of epigenetics, have caught the public's imagination. Hardly a day goes by without some media reference to a particular feature 'being in the DNA'. This phrase is no longer confined to genetically determined characteristics, but can extend to the cultural aspects of entire nations – 'Opera is in the Italian DNA' (The Observer); 'Carols are part of our cultural DNA' (Radio 4, Today). It seems that we're thinking not just of nurture and nature, but of 'second nature' too – those deeply embedded, almost instinctive behaviours. 'In the DNA' is now used as a catch-all phase for what makes you who you are – the biologically embedded determinants of one's development.

This language is countered to some extent by phrases like 'Why your DNA isn't your destiny' (Time magazine). This blurring of Nature (inherited DNA code) and Nurture (environment) is compounded by evidence that some induced epigenetic alterations can be transmitted to future generations. This is the mechanism by which environmental cues during early development and beyond can result in enduring changes to our gene activity. Although not changing the DNA code itself, these induced changes can last a lifetime and influence our health and well-being.

Does this blurring of boundaries matter? I believe it can when one moves to specifics. One such example is conception by gamete donation. Last November, following a misleading newspaper headline that claimed 'Infertile mums "pass on DNA"', Dr Jess Buxton wrote a comment piece for BioNews in which she explained that the truth is that research published last year indicates that infertile mums can pass on RNA – not DNA (see BioNews 826). They are not passing on genes – those come from the egg donor.

There are good reasons to guard against such factual errors, if only because of the human tendency to 'pick and mix' information to build stories about the things that mean most to them. Fertility professionals should think twice about going along with the understandable desire of some donor-gamete recipients to downplay the fact that all their baby's genes come with the egg and sperm. They should by all means discuss the role the carrying mother plays in their baby's development, but they should not encourage a disregard for the donor's genes. Indeed, an important element of gamete-donor selection is to consider potential genetic risks to future children. The candidate donor's family history is assessed to exclude a high risk of transmitting a serious, inherited disease, and a DNA sample is screened for 'hidden' risks, such as common recessive mutations (e.g. carrier status for cystic fibrosis). Nevertheless, the research suggests that, even before implantation, a donor-recipient mother – like any mother – may be sending molecular signals to the embryo that can directly influence its gene activity. Scientists are exploring the molecular details at the boundary between generations, and the link between genetic inheritance and the nurturing womb.

As Dr Buxton explained, the RNA molecules that were passed to the pre-implantation embryo were microRNAs: 'As the name suggests, microRNAs are short sections of RNA, a chemical relative of DNA. Their job is to fine-tune the activity levels of genes during development and throughout life. As such, they are a key part of the epigenetic machinery. MicroRNAs, like proteins, are themselves the products of genes – there are over 2500 known human microRNA genes. Each microRNA is predicted to have hundreds to thousands of different target genes, enabling them to influence complex networks of gene activity in processes ranging from growth and development to immunity.' The study focused on a particular microRNA called hsa-miR-30d, which was packaged into a tiny vesicle called an exosome. This is how microRNAs are often transported around the body – or in this case between the lining of the mother's womb and her 'receptive' pre-implantation embryo.

In an egg-donor situation, the DNA of the carrying mother could dictate the formation of a microRNA that enters the embryo to influence the activity of some of its own genes, probably those involved in the implantation process. Here is a tentative description of one of the first molecular investments a recipient mother can make in her embryo. As such, some recipient mothers may find this information comforting. But, generally, recent discoveries in epigenetic regulation across the generations (e.g. in relation to smoking and diet) bring added responsibilities – not only for the baby they are carrying but for potential grandchildren – for the father as well as the mother. Research in mice supports the notion that some of the microRNAs associated with a man's lifestyle are loaded into mature sperm and influence the early development of the next generation.

Greater public recognition of these transgenerational responses to parental experience may well have contributed to the blurring of the boundaries implicit in phrases such as 'in our cultural DNA'. In the past, the word DNA was synonymous with genes and genetic inheritance but it has now come to embrace cultural continuity as well. This is going well beyond the science. One thing we can say is that we cannot choose our parents and ancestors. Beyond families at specific genetic risk, there is not much any of us can do about the genes we are dealt, but we can invest in the future.

SOURCES & REFERENCES

RELATED ARTICLES FROM THE BIONEWS ARCHIVE

31 May 2016 - by Rachel Reeves 
A research review suggests that cannabis use damages DNA, and claims that this damage can be inherited...
04 April 2016 - by Dr Rachel Brown 
A large international study has revealed that smoking during pregnancy may chemically alter the DNA of the developing fetus...
02 November 2015 - by Dr Jess Buxton 
A recent study suggests that embryonic gene activity may be altered by factors present in the womb even before implantation. This finding triggered a somewhat misleading newspaper article entitled 'Infertile mums "pass on DNA"', which claimed the research means recipients of donor eggs are passing on their own DNA to their child. This isn't the case...
01 September 2015 - by Professor Marcus Pembrey 
Human studies of transgenerational responses are fraught with difficulties, but definitely worth pursuing...
07 April 2014 - by Dr Kimberley Bryon-Dodd 
Smoking before puberty may lead to men fathering fatter sons, suggesting that lifestyle factors can have adverse impacts on the next generation, a study has found...

HAVE YOUR SAY
Be the first to have your say.

You need to or  to add comments.

By posting a comment you agree to abide by the BioNews terms and conditions


- click here to enquire about using this story.

Published by the Progress Educational Trust

CROSSING FRONTIERS

Public Conference
London
8 December 2017

Speakers include

Professor Azim Surani

Professor Magdalena Zernicka-Goetz

Professor Robin Lovell-Badge

Sally Cheshire

Professor Guido Pennings

Katherine Littler

Professor Allan Pacey

Dr Sue Avery

Professor Richard Anderson

Dr Elizabeth Garner

Dr Andy Greenfield

Dr Anna Smajdor

Dr Henry Malter

Vivienne Parry

Dr Helen O'Neill

Dr César Palacios-González

Philippa Taylor

Fiona Fox

Sarah Norcross

Sandy Starr


BOOK HERE

Good Fundraising Code

Become a Friend of PET HERE and give the Progress Educational Trust a regular donation