Subscribe to the BioNews newsletter for free

Login
Advanced Search

Search for
BioNews

Like the Progress Educational Trust on Facebook


 


 

Event Review: Changing Fertility: Social, Demographic and Ethical Consequences of Assisted Conception Technologies

01 August 2016

By Dr Nitzan Peri-Rotem

Appeared in BioNews 862

This spring, an international forum on 'Changing Fertility: Social, Demographic and Ethical Consequences of Assisted Conception Technologies' was held in Cambridge, bringing together academic researchers, health professionals and policy makers. This event, which was jointly organised by the Reproductive Sociology Research Group and the Philomathia Programme at the University of Cambridge, laid the groundwork to explore changing fertility trends amid the rapidly growing industry of assisted reproductive technologies (ART). The spread of ART has brought renewed hope to many couples and individuals with difficulties conceiving, and stretched the biological age limits of childbearing. However, these new technologies are still limited in their ability to overcome age-related infertility.

The forum provided an opportunity to revisit some of the common myths and misconceptions about ART and infertility. Lone Schmidt, an Associate Professor at the University of Copenhagen, noted that infertility - defined as a failure to conceive after one year or more of regular unprotected sexual intercourse – affects around one in six couples in developed countries. In addition, she noted that while there is an almost exclusive focus on women when addressing issues of reproduction, nearly 40 percent of cases of infertility are male-dependent, as a result of poor semen quality. This is similar to the share of female-dependent infertility, while other cases are either couple-dependent or due to unknown causes. Moreover, many people have poor knowledge about infertility and its risk factors. There is a tendency to underestimate the impact of advanced female age on infertility, and to overestimate the success rates of fertility treatments. Finally, she noted that even the best ART are not sufficient to overcome reduced fertility caused by advanced female age. Therefore, access to assisted fertility should go hand in hand with prevention of infertility. 

This raises the question of why people delay childbearing in the first place. Tomas Sobotka, a Senior Researcher from the Vienna Institute of Demography, explained that men and women delay childbearing for very concrete reasons, including prolonged education, increased economic insecurity and less stable relationships. Therefore, while it is biologically optimal for women to start a family when they are in their early or mid-20s, this does not always match their social circumstances. This delay has exacerbated Europe's declining fertility rates and the increase in childlessness. So far, the contribution of ART in countering these trends has been quite modest. However, impact varies considerably from one country to another. For example, in countries with higher public spending on fertility treatment, like Denmark and Belgium, around five percent of births occur following ART use, compared to around one percent of births in the USA and just over two percent of births in the UK. While these figures may not seem very high, the share of ART babies among women aged 40 and above is considerably larger.

These issues may continue to spark further debate on the appropriate policy to address infertility, and the extent to which the timing of childbearing is a matter of free choice. While women potentially have different options to delay childbearing, such as using egg freezing, these options are subject to various social, economic and biological constraints. In this context, one of the main propositions stressed by forum participants is that delayed childbearing should not be understood simply as a private matter, but also as a socially and economically dependent choice. Therefore, early family formation must be supported by a change at the institutional level.  

SOURCES & REFERENCES

RELATED ARTICLES FROM THE BIONEWS ARCHIVE

03 April 2017 - by Jamie Rickman 
Can egg freezing be considered a feminist technology? Should we really be addressing the failures of a social fabric that requires women to preserve their fertility at all? This event was an exciting opening to an urgently needed discussion and is the first in a series of 'fertile conversations' that should be eagerly anticipated...
08 August 2016 - by Rachel Siden 
Half of Me is a play aimed at a young audience, and tells the story of children born through Assisted Reproductive Technology (ART)...

20 July 2015 - by Associate Professor Hana Konečná 
What happens if you ask children what age they would like their parents to be, and should this influence the debate on age limits for assisted reproduction?...
09 March 2015 - by Dr Rachel Brown 
I arrived with some bemusement at this one-hour debate, 'Does egg-freezing enable women to "have it all"', to Beyoncé playing out loudly to an excited lecture theatre...

HAVE YOUR SAY
Be the first to have your say.

You need to or  to add comments.

By posting a comment you agree to abide by the BioNews terms and conditions


- click here to enquire about using this story.

Published by the Progress Educational Trust

CROSSING FRONTIERS

Public Conference
London
8 December 2017

Speakers include

Professor Azim Surani

Professor Magdalena Zernicka-Goetz

Professor Robin Lovell-Badge

Sally Cheshire

Professor Guido Pennings

Katherine Littler

Professor Allan Pacey

Dr Sue Avery

Professor Richard Anderson

Dr Elizabeth Garner

Dr Andy Greenfield

Dr Anna Smajdor

Dr Henry Malter

Vivienne Parry

Dr Helen O'Neill

Dr César Palacios-González

Philippa Taylor

Fiona Fox

Sarah Norcross

Sandy Starr


BOOK HERE

Good Fundraising Code

Become a Friend of PET HERE and give the Progress Educational Trust a regular donation