Subscribe to the BioNews newsletter for free

Login
Advanced Search

Search for
BioNews

Like the Progress Educational Trust on Facebook


 


 

Australian IVF experts propose allowing gender selection

01 August 2016

By Lone Hørlyck

Appeared in BioNews 862

Australian IVF clinics are calling for parents to be permitted to choose the sex of their third child if they already have two children of the same gender.

These demands are under consideration by a committee which has been reviewing Australian assisted reproduction laws since 2013. The committee, which is formed of members of the Australian National Health and Medical Research Council, has been urged by experts in the fertility industry to allow parents to 'balance' families with boys and girls.

The committee chairman, Dr Ian Olver, said that they would not endorse gender selection bias for cultural or racial reasons. 'We wouldn’t want to promote any gender bias so that people select the sex of their first child,' Dr Olver said. He added that the review was considering strong opinions on both sides, and was focused on 'the wellbeing of the child and how that child is valued.' 

The committee is expected to finish its recommendations this year. When finalised, the recommendations will be reviewed by the Australian Health Ethics Committee.

Gender selection is not allowed in Australia today except under compelling medical reasons, such as if a serious genetic disease that only affects one gender runs in the family.

Professor Michael Chapman, President of the Fertility Society of Australia, defended the idea of controlled gender selection, arguing that it would only affect a very small number of people, as most parents who use IVF services do not wish to choose the sex of their children.

Professor Chapman also argued that gender selection is already widely available in Asia and the US, causing Australian families to go overseas in order to choose the gender of their future children. 'Clinicians are seeing requests like this probably once a month and we know there are significant numbers of couples spending many tens of thousands of dollars overseas in sometimes not the most reputable units.'

Supporters of the proposal to legalise gender selection also suggest that this option may reduce the number of women who choose to terminate their pregnancy based on gender preferences.

Others have expressed concern about the legalisation of any form of gender selection that is not made on weighty medical grounds. The president of the Australian Medical Association, Dr Michael Gannon, said gender selection was 'not appropriate use of medical science'. The Australian Christian Lobby also opposed the suggestion, comparing it to abortion.

Professor Steve Robson, President-elect of the Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists, said the issue should not be decided by IVF specialists, but by the wider public.

RELATED ARTICLES FROM THE BIONEWS ARCHIVE

24 April 2017 - by Dr Jane Currie 
Australia has maintained a ban on sex selection for non-medical reasons, in revised guidelines on assisted reproductive technologies (ART) published this month...

23 March 2015 - by Sophie McLachlan 
The nutrient-filled liquid used to grow embryos during IVF might affect the resulting male to female birth ratio, a study suggests...
28 October 2013 - by María Victoria Rivas Llanos 
Sex selection in IVF as a method of avoiding autism has been approved for the first time by health authorities in Western Australia...
08 July 2013 - by Matthew Young 
A report produced by bioethicists from Keele University has concluded that there is no justifiable basis on which to ban IVF sex selection in the UK....
23 January 2012 - by Dr Rebecca Robey 
A test has been developed to determine the sex of a fetus from only five weeks old. The test relies on a blood sample from the mother and therefore carries no risk to the child...
15 August 2011 - by Rose Palmer 
A simple blood test for pregnant women can accurately predict the sex of a fetus at seven weeks, much earlier than conventional techniques, new research has found. A systematic review and meta-analysis examined the results of 57 earlier studies that included more than 6,500 pregnancies...

HAVE YOUR SAY
Be the first to have your say.

You need to or  to add comments.

By posting a comment you agree to abide by the BioNews terms and conditions


- click here to enquire about using this story.

Published by the Progress Educational Trust

CROSSING FRONTIERS

Public Conference
London
8 December 2017

Speakers include

Professor Azim Surani

Professor Magdalena Zernicka-Goetz

Professor Robin Lovell-Badge

Sally Cheshire

Professor Guido Pennings

Katherine Littler

Professor Allan Pacey

Dr Sue Avery

Professor Richard Anderson

Dr Elizabeth Garner

Dr Andy Greenfield

Dr Anna Smajdor

Dr Henry Malter

Vivienne Parry

Dr Helen O'Neill

Dr César Palacios-González

Philippa Taylor

Fiona Fox

Sarah Norcross

Sandy Starr


BOOK HERE

Good Fundraising Code

Become a Friend of PET HERE and give the Progress Educational Trust a regular donation