Subscribe to the BioNews newsletter for free

Login
Advanced Search

Search for
BioNews


Printer Friendly Page Follow BioNews on Twitter BioNews RSS feed

 

Login




News


HGC publishes new report on direct-to-consumer genetic testing

09 August 2010

By Chris Chatterton

Appeared in BioNews 570

The Human Genome Commission (HGC) has published a new ‘Common Framework of Principles’ for direct-to-consumer (DTC) genetic tests on 4 August.

The HGC states that ‘The market in direct-to-consumer genetic testing has grown significantly over recent years’ and there is a ‘need to develop high level principles for direct-to-consumer genetic tests’.

The organisation has created 13 principles that cover issues relating to the marketing and advertising of tests, consumer information, regulatory information, and laboratory standards. Further issues covered by the principles include counselling and support for consumers, data protection, sample handling, and consent.

The HGC hopes that ‘The Principles will promote high standards and consistency in the provision of genetic tests amongst commercial providers at an international level’.

The principles were put together by an expert group that met in London in June 2008, who agreed that common guidelines were needed. This resulted in a consultation draft in 2009, and a final draft being published in summer 2010.

This ‘working group’ consisted of 11 members, which included Dr Frances Flinter, a clinical geneticist from Guy’s and St Thomas’ Hospital in London, Mr Alastair Kent from Genetic Alliance UK, and Dr Ron Zimmern from the Foundation for Genomics and Population Health. 

The HGC is a UK government advisory body that reports on genetic developments and their ethical, legal, social and economic implications.       

The release of the principles follows a highly critical report by the US government, which found that DTC genetic tests in the US were often misleading and inaccurate.

 

SOURCES & REFERENCES
Human Genetics Commission | 04 August 2010
 
The Independent | 04 August 2010
 
The Times | 04 August 2010
 

RELATED ARTICLES FROM THE BIONEWS ARCHIVE

06 June 2011 - by Rosemary Paxman 
Direct-to-consumer (DTC) genetic tests provide an inaccurate prediction of disease risk and offer little benefit to consumers, scientists claim...[Read More]
17 January 2011 - by Rosie Beauchamp 
A recent study suggests American consumers would be prepared to pay on average up to $600 for a predictive genetic test where no direct treatment is available....[Read More]
18 October 2010 - by Dr Vivienne Raper 
Would you publish your genome? Last week, the 12-member Genomes Unzipped project published their direct-to-consumer genetic test results online. They say they're dispelling fears and encouraging discussion about what genetics means for society. But, in a Royal Institution debate on Thursday, Wellcome Trust Director Sir Mark Walport said openly disclosing their DNA would - like drunken Facebook party pictures - return to haunt them...[Read More]

26 July 2010 - by Chris Chatterton 
Direct-to-consumer genetic tests were called into question by the US authorities last week. An undercover investigation by the US Government Accountability Office (GAO) found that test results were often inaccurate and misleading....[Read More]
12 October 2009 - by Dr Jess Buxton 
Companies offering 'direct-to-consumer' genetic tests to predict the risk of common conditions such as heart attack and rheumatoid arthritis should provide more information to consumers about the limitations of their services, say US scientists. Their recommendations follow the finding that several tests from two such companies gave different results for the same five individuals. Genome pioneer Craig Venter and colleagues also call for more research into the predictive power of geneti
03 August 2009 - by Dr Charlotte Maden 
People who have had their genome scanned to find the relative risks of them developing common genetic disorders may find themselves more or less at risk now than when they had the test done, even if thier lifestyle hasn't changed. This is due to more discoveries being made in the genetics field, and since it is often not understood by the individual, has resulted in calls for tighter regulations for the testing....[Read More]

HAVE YOUR SAY
Be the first to have your say.

You need to Login or Register to add comments.

By posting a comment you agree to abide by the BioNews terms and conditions

 


 

- click here to enquire about using this story.


submit to reddit
Delicious delicious
Facebook

Share on Tumblr


Printer Friendly Page


BioNews Appeal: Please donate HERE to keep BioNews independent and FREE to read


The Progress Educational Trust has been shortlisted for the Charity Times Awards 2011

Good Fundraising Code


Advertise your products and services HERE - click for further details