Subscribe to the BioNews newsletter for free

Login
Advanced Search

Search for
BioNews

Like the Progress Educational Trust on Facebook


The Fertility Show


 

Can women put motherhood on ice?

27 June 2016

By Dr Lucy Freem

Appeared in BioNews 857

The rain and mist were thick in Edinburgh on the evening of 15 June, when the Progress Educational Trust (PET) held its first-ever debate in Scotland. But despite the weather – and the fact that the subject of the debate was egg freezing – the atmosphere in the Great Hall of the Royal College of Physicians of Edinburgh could not have been warmer.

The debate, 'Can Women Put Motherhood On Ice?', organised in partnership with the Scottish Government, covered the many medical and social aspects of egg freezing. It also discussed how best to ensure that women are neither pressured to freeze eggs nor denied the option of doing so.

The speaker panel was made up of two specialists in reproductive medicine and two specialists in bioethics, with an additional biomedical expert – Professor Jane Norman, director of Tommy's Maternal and Fetal Research Centre at the Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh – as chair.

The debate was a satellite event of World Congress of the International Association of Bioethics, which took place nearby. Many of the delegates from the congress – bioethicists from around the world – attended, together with a wide variety of patients, professionals, academics and others. This made for an especially lively and productive discussion.

David Baird, emeritus professor of reproductive endocrinology at the University of Edinburgh, gave an overview of the biology of human egg production in the fetus and the gradual reduction of eggs by cell death or ovulation until the menopause. He made a point that was referred to repeatedly throughout the evening – research shows that the most common reason for women to delay attempting pregnancy is, quite simply, the lack of a partner with whom they want to raise a family.

There seemed to be few palatable solutions to this problem. The approach that was most strongly supported by speakers and attendees was fertility education – encouraging men and women alike, from a young age, to understand fertility and to start considering these issues early on.

Dr Sarah Martins Da Silva, consultant gynaecologist at Ninewells Hospital and Medical School, discussed the increasing trend towards delayed childbearing. She pointed out that while egg freezing may improve the quality of oocytes available to a woman seeking to have genetic offspring, pregnancy at an older age still carries increased risks to both mother and child. This prompted a debate about whether it is necessary, desirable or ethical to recommend a maximum age to attempt pregnancy. Most of the panel agreed, with caveats, that the decision to attempt pregnancy must ultimately be up to the individual.

Dr Ainsley Newson, associate professor of bioethics at the University of Sydney in Australia, posed some incisive questions about companies paying for employees to freeze their eggs. If unaccompanied by parent-friendly policies, are such offers simply a way for companies to mask their lack of meaningful support for employees who wish to have children? What happens if a woman whose frozen eggs are stored at the expense of the company wishes to leave – does this give the company undue leverage over the employee?

Dr Angel Petropanagos, research associate in the impact ethics team at Dalhousie University in Canada, stressed the importance of understanding the social pressures that can force women to pursue or avoid pregnancy at different times in their lives. She pointed out that the high social value placed upon biological reproduction, for women in particular, is a factor that can significantly constrain women's choices.

Both Dr Petropanagos and Dr Newson discussed the importance of language in shaping the debate. Though the faintly pejorative 'social egg freezing' is commonly used in the media, the distinction between medical and social egg freezing is technologically and biologically fairly meaningless. The distinction can unhelpfully polarise the debate around egg freezing.

Many issues were raised during questions and comments from the audience, including the UK's current ten-year legal limit on social egg freezing. This means that eggs frozen by a woman in her early 20s would lead to eggs that were unusable by her mid-30s. This only adds to the ethical repercussions of marketing egg freezing to younger women.

Full education of young people of all sexes about their reproductive options and constraints was a popular topic. The Scottish Government's funding of Infertility Network UK's work in this area was lauded, as was its recent announcement that it will expand the provision of publicly funded IVF (see BioNews 855).

This may have been PET's first debate in Scotland, but it was by no means the last. Having debated fertility preservation for non-medical reasons, PET will next be debating fertility preservation for medical reasons at its event 'Frozen Assets? Preserving Sperm, Eggs and Embryos' in Edinburgh on Tuesday 25 October.

SOURCES & REFERENCES

RELATED ARTICLES FROM THE BIONEWS ARCHIVE

03 April 2017 - by Jamie Rickman 
Can egg freezing be considered a feminist technology? Should we really be addressing the failures of a social fabric that requires women to preserve their fertility at all? This event was an exciting opening to an urgently needed discussion and is the first in a series of 'fertile conversations' that should be eagerly anticipated...
11 July 2016 - by Sandy Starr 
Can egg freezing deliver on its promise? Does the possibility of delaying motherhood mean winning the battle for gender equality, or does it mean the opposite?...
04 July 2016 - by Dr Rachel Brown 
Nearly one-fifth of women aged 35 to 44 years have had problems conceiving, according to a survey of over 15,000 British people...
04 July 2016 - by Sarah Norcross 
Bioethics conferences don't get much bigger than this – the International Association of Bioethics Congress drew 700 attendees to the Edinburgh International Conference Centre...

11 April 2016 - by Dr Edgar Mocanu 
Oncofertility services allow some women to cryopreserve oocytes, embryos or ovarian tissue in order to protect their ability to have a family when faced with malignancy and adjuvant therapy. However, to date, fertility cryopreservation had very little to offer young, pre-pubertal girls...
04 April 2016 - by Antony Blackburn-Starza 
Pregnancy and live birth rates following IVF have continued to increase as the multiple-birth rate declines, according to the latest figures released by the HFEA...
14 March 2016 - by Lone Hørlyck 
At a first glance, Timeless looked like a perfumery or a beauty clinic, the walls covered with carefully placed bottles and boxes in pastel colours. But nothing in the shop was actually for sale. Rather, this was a pop-up egg-freezing 'shop'...
24 August 2015 - by Dr Edgar Mocanu 
How easy is to tell a 25-year-old that she has no eggs and that she may never have a family using her own oocytes...

HAVE YOUR SAY
Be the first to have your say.

You need to or  to add comments.

By posting a comment you agree to abide by the BioNews terms and conditions


- click here to enquire about using this story.

Published by the Progress Educational Trust

CROSSING FRONTIERS

Moving the Boundaries of Human Reproduction

Public Conference
London
8 December 2017

Speakers include

Professor Azim Surani

Professor Magdalena Zernicka-Goetz

Professor Robin Lovell-Badge

Sally Cheshire

Professor Guido Pennings

Katherine Littler

Professor Allan Pacey

Dr Sue Avery

Professor Richard Anderson

Dr Elizabeth Garner

Dr Jacques Cohen

Dr Anna Smajdor

Dr Andy Greenfield

Vivienne Parry

Dr Helen O'Neill

Dr César Palacios-González

Philippa Taylor

Fiona Fox

Sarah Norcross


BOOK HERE

Good Fundraising Code

Become a Friend of PET HERE and give the Progress Educational Trust a regular donation