Subscribe to the BioNews newsletter for free

Login
Advanced Search

Search for
BioNews

Like the Progress Educational Trust on Facebook


The Fertility Show


 

Public wants synthetic biology regulated, survey says

21 June 2010

By Nishat Hyder

Appeared in BioNews 563

According to the most extensive public survey yet, the British public are at ease with the idea of synthetic biology - but only if it is responsibly regulated.

The survey - 'Synthetic Biology Public Dialogue' - was commissioned by the Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council and the Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council with the aim of aiding the research councils on how to proceed with funding research in the field of synthetic biology.

'We want the science to flourish, but we also want it to be accepted', said Professor Paul Freemont, Co-director of the UK Centre for Synthetic Biology. 'We want the public to engage with it, understand it and also to influence it'.

Although initially uneasy with this level of public input, Freemont admits that after giving some thought to the matter, he believes it is a 'good idea'. In the same vein, Dr Brian Johnson, author of the report, points out that no scientific advance has ever been as potentially world changing as synthetic biology, thus extensive public consultation is imperative.

The survey revealed that the public were happy for synthetic biology research to progress so long as it would bring benefits. The public also said they wanted scientists to have respect for the material they were working with, and they wanted factors such as social values and scientific merit to be weighted in decisions when awarding grants for research.

The term 'synthetic biology' has caused some concern amongst the scientific community. 'Having the word 'synthetic' next to the word 'biology' does provoke a reaction in people that can be negative', said Freemont. Freemont felt this was particularly as some believe that J Craig Venter's recent creation of Synthia - recently reported in BioNews - cannot properly be called artificial life.

Roland Jackson, Chief Executive of the British Science Association, believes changing labels would be wrong: 'Craig Venter did artificially create that cell…The concept of the synthetic and the natural are difficult oppositions for the public and scientists need to be aware of that…But I don't think they should be over-sensitive to it. They should say what they mean and mean what they say and I think the public respects an honest and open approach to this'.

SOURCES & REFERENCES
BBC News | 14 June 2010
 

RELATED ARTICLES FROM THE BIONEWS ARCHIVE

08 April 2013 - by Simon Hazelwood-Smith 
One of the essential components of a computer, the transistor, has been created in a living biological system for the first time...
28 January 2013 - by Daryl Ramai 
Digital information can be reliably stored in DNA, say scientists...
23 April 2012 - by Ana Pallesen 
Six new kinds of artificial genetic material have been created by scientists. These XNAs, or xeno-nucleic acids, have similar life-building properties to naturally-occurring DNA...
02 April 2012 - by Dr Louisa Petchey 
Synthetic biology, which uses genetic engineering to build new genomes and organisms, has come under attack in a report published by Friends of the Earth and supported by over 100 other 'public interest' groups...
12 July 2010 - by Dr Vivienne Raper 
Before Dr Julian Huppert was elected MP for Cambridge in May this year, he was a computational biologist at Cambridge University studying the structure and function of DNA. Now, he's one of only two scientists with PhDs in parliament. BioNews quizzed him about science funding, synthetic biology and the shortage of scientists in politics...

01 June 2010 - by Professor Marilyn Monk 
Craig Venter and colleagues recently published their work on a synthesised life form. Once again scientists are charged with playing God and the associated hype and scaremongering promise cures and treatments for all sorts of human and planetary ailments, threaten a future of unknown dangers from genetically manipulated life forms, and demand a re-analysis of the meaning of life and God....
24 May 2010 - by Dr Gabrielle Samuel 
As an ex-genetic researcher I was incredibly excited to hear in last week's news that researchers at the J Craig Venter Institute, US, have successfully constructed the first self-replicating, synthetic bacterial cell....
21 December 2009 - by Dr Rachael Panizzo 
There is a risk that advances in synthetic biology and low-cost DNA sequencing and synthesis could lead to the misuse of genetic technologies for bioterrorism purposes, where sequences of DNA could be ordered from a commercial gene synthesis provider and genetically engineered into a biological warfare agent....

HAVE YOUR SAY
Be the first to have your say.

You need to or  to add comments.

By posting a comment you agree to abide by the BioNews terms and conditions


- click here to enquire about using this story.

Published by the Progress Educational Trust

CROSSING FRONTIERS

Moving the Boundaries of Human Reproduction

Public Conference
London
8 December 2017

Speakers include

Professor Azim Surani

Professor Magdalena Zernicka-Goetz

Professor Robin Lovell-Badge

Sally Cheshire

Professor Guido Pennings

Katherine Littler

Professor Allan Pacey

Dr Sue Avery

Professor Richard Anderson

Dr Elizabeth Garner

Dr Jacques Cohen

Dr Anna Smajdor

Dr Andy Greenfield

Vivienne Parry

Dr Helen O'Neill

Dr César Palacios-González

Philippa Taylor

Fiona Fox

Sarah Norcross


BOOK HERE

Good Fundraising Code

Become a Friend of PET HERE and give the Progress Educational Trust a regular donation