Subscribe to the BioNews newsletter for free

Login
Advanced Search

Search for
BioNews

Like the Progress Educational Trust on Facebook


 


 

Prenatal effects on sperm production in adult males

10 May 2010

By Professor Allan Pacey

Senior Lecturer in Andrology at the University of Sheffield

Appeared in BioNews 557
Nearly 10 years ago, Professor Niels Skakkebæk from the Copenhagen University Hospital, published details of a new syndrome to account for the apparent increase in problems related to the male reproductive system that had been documented in many countries (1). These problems included increasing incidence of testicular cancer and undescended testicles, and apparently lower sperm counts in some young men in comparison to their fathers' generation.

The syndrome, termed 'Testicular Dysgenesis Syndrome', had at its core the notion that the testicle might be sensitive to chemicals in the environment and diet which led to increased risk of cancer or poor fertility in some men. No surprise there, you may say. But importantly, the theory proposed that is was not exposure in adult life that was important, rather exposure of the testicle in pre-natal life that might be more critical in determining the risk of cancer or infertility in adult life.

The idea of something happening before an individual is born that could affect their health in adult life was new. A few years before, Professor David Barker, working at the University of Southampton, had published data (2) suggesting that an individual's risk of heart disease in adult life might be related to their birth-weight and therefore, by inference, the quality of the pregnancy they enjoyed in fetal-life.

To study such trans-generational effects is clearly very difficult, particularly in human populations where the generation time is so long. There are obvious ethical and technical limitations of performing any kind of interventional experiment to prove these theories one way or the other. Yet, when data sets emerge which allow us to test them, they invariably fit to a lesser or greater extent.

Take, for example, the data on smoking cigarettes. The studies that have examined the effect on sperm counts of men smoking cigarettes show that there is only a small influence at best: the sperm counts of men who smoke cigarettes are largely similar to those of men who do not (3). But when data sets compare the sperm counts of men whose mothers smoked during pregnancy a much larger effect is seen: sperm counts of men born to women who smoked are significantly lower than those of men whose mothers didn't smoke (4).

This is just one example, and it is important to note that this is not an endorsement to would-be fathers to continue (or start) smoking when they are trying to achieve a pregnancy: smoking is known to damage sperm DNA (5), which probably contributes to infertility. But the data do illustrate the point that the number of sperm that men are able to produce may not necessarily be attributable to his lifestyle and exposures as an individual. Rather, it may have already been established before he was born.

At a conceptual level, it is very difficult for individuals to attribute their own life events with something that their mothers may have done or been exposed to before they were born. As such, the theories of Barker or Skakkebæk are still not as widely recognised as they should be. Therefore, when journalists write articles about what may affect male fertility they invariably jump straight to the obvious and concern themselves only with what men should or shouldn't do with their lives to retain whatever sperm production capacity they have. Sadly, they tend to ignore the rather interesting biological processes that occur many years earlier and which are probably more important.

It was with some pleasure and surprise, therefore, to see some better reporting in the Daily Telegraph (6) and Daily Mail (7) newspapers concerning the very comprehensive review of the topic by Professor Richard Sharpe at the University of Edinburgh, Scotland (8). Perhaps, finally, we are getting the message across that sperm counts are about more than just the man and his lifestyle.

SOURCES & REFERENCES
1) Skakkebaek N. E., Rajpert-De Meyts E., Main K. M., (2001) Testicular dysgenesis syndrome: an increasingly common developmental disorder with environmental aspects
Human Reproduction 16: 972-978 | 
 
2) Barker D. J., (1995) Fetal origins of coronary heart disease
British Medical Journal 311: 171-174 | 
 
3) Vine M. F., Margolin B. H., Morrison H. I., Hulka B. S., (1994) Cigarette smoking and sperm density: a meta-analysis
Fertility and Sterility 61: 35-43 | 
 
4) Ramlau-Hansen C. H., Thulstrup A. M., Storgaard L., Toft G., Olsen J., Bonde J. P., (2007) Is prenatal exposure to tobacco smoking a cause of poor semen quality? A follow-up study
American Journal of Epidemiology 165: 1372-1379 | 
 
5) Sepaniak S., Forges T., Gerard H., Foliguet B., Bene M. C., Monnier-Barbarino P., (2006) The influence of cigarette smoking on human sperm quality and DNA fragmentation
Toxicology. 223: 54-60 | 
 
The Daily Telegraph | 19 April 2010
 
The Daily Mail | 19 April 2010
 
8) Sharpe R. M., (2010) Environmental/lifestyle effects on spermatogenesis
Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London, Series B, Biological sciences 365: 1697-1712 | 
 

RELATED ARTICLES FROM THE BIONEWS ARCHIVE

06 October 2014 - by Dr Charlotte Warren-Gash 
Mothers who smoke while pregnant or breastfeeding may reduce their sons' future fertility, according to research...
09 December 2013 - by Professor Marcus Pembrey 
Last week saw a lot of media interest around a US study published in Nature Neuroscience reporting the transgenerational effects of fear-conditioning in mice...
16 January 2012 - by Professor Allan Pacey 
Crystal ball gazing has never been my strong suit but I found myself rising to the challenge now that I have taken over the mantle of Chairman of the British Fertility Society. What is clear is that 2012 should turn out to be an interesting year...
25 July 2011 - by Rosemary Paxman 
Passive smoking may harm the DNA in sperm, a new study in mice has suggested. If the findings are replicated in humans, genetic defects linked to passive smoking could be passed on to children, the researchers advise....
21 February 2011 - by Sujatha Jayakody 
A bone cell hormone can regulate male fertility hormone testosterone, a study on mice has found. Male mice engineered to produce little osteocalcin, a hormone released by bone cells called osteoblasts, had smaller litters and testes than unmodified mice...

26 April 2010 - by Kyrillos Georgiadis 
Expectant mothers' lifestyles and environment could have a 'major impact' on their sons' sperm counts, a study has found...
11 December 2009 - by Dr Rosalind M John 
The aim of assisted reproductive technology (ART) is to achieve a single most important goal, the birth of a healthy child. ART is responsible for the birth of over 200,000 children each year worldwide. In the most common form of infertility treatment - IVF - the woman's eggs are collected and then combined with the man's sperm in a petri dish. The successfully fertilised eggs are then transferred into the woman's womb. In ...
01 November 2009 - by Dr Jay Stone 
Exposure to a combination of excessive stress and everyday chemicals whilst in the womb can have implications for future male fertility, according to Dr Amanda Drake and colleagues from the Centre for Cardiovascular Science and Reproductive Biology at the Queen's Medical Research Institute, University of Edinburgh....
08 September 2008 - by Sarah Pritchard 
A principal investigator for the Human Reproductive Sciences Unit of the UK's Medical Research Council (MRC) has revealed that using certain cosmetics during the early stages of pregnancy could affect fertility in males in later life. Professor Richard Sharpe undertook research on rats, which showed that after...

HAVE YOUR SAY
Be the first to have your say.

You need to or  to add comments.

By posting a comment you agree to abide by the BioNews terms and conditions


- click here to enquire about using this story.

Published by the Progress Educational Trust

CROSSING FRONTIERS

Public Conference
London
8 December 2017

Speakers include

Professor Azim Surani

Professor Magdalena Zernicka-Goetz

Professor Robin Lovell-Badge

Sally Cheshire

Professor Guido Pennings

Katherine Littler

Professor Allan Pacey

Dr Sue Avery

Professor Richard Anderson

Dr Elizabeth Garner

Dr Andy Greenfield

Dr Anna Smajdor

Dr Henry Malter

Vivienne Parry

Dr Helen O'Neill

Dr César Palacios-González

Philippa Taylor

Fiona Fox

Sarah Norcross

Sandy Starr


BOOK HERE

Good Fundraising Code

Become a Friend of PET HERE and give the Progress Educational Trust a regular donation