Subscribe to the BioNews newsletter for free

Login
Advanced Search

Search for
BioNews

Like the Progress Educational Trust on Facebook


 


 

TV Review: Octomum: Me and my 14 kids

14 November 2009

By Jenny Dunlop

Appeared in BioNews 534

Channel 4, 12 November 2009

To be an impartial reviewer (if there ever is such a person) one needs to have an open uncluttered mind and a willingness to learn. I certainly had the latter, but with so much media hype it was very difficult to have the former with impartiality. I was hoping for illumination into Nadya Suleman's reason in January 2009, for having six IVF embryos replaced that created eight babies. I was hoping for sound reasons and explanations. I should have known better! Those of us who work in the fertility field know that there is always someone in every fertility clinic whose needs and desperation the professionals do not totally understand. We also know that there are some doctors who find it on occasions very difficult to say no to patients' requests. We also know that unfortunately commercial forces are often inevitable, with clinics having to constantly show excellent results to keep people coming.

What I did learn from this Channel 4 documentary (who incidentally themselves got scooped up in the commercialism which they appeared to be criticising on the film) was that Nadya, an only child, had a very dysfunctional relationship with her mother that was played out in front of the camera. (Brilliant television of course!) And that she had used the same known donor, who was a platonic friend, to help her create embryos through IVF at a clinic in California. Although she had six children already she wanted 'one more' so decided to have the last six embryos replaced. As two embryos split she then delivered eight babies, to the surprise of the obstetric team, who thought that she was having seven. She was offered selective fetal reduction, which she refused as this felt like 'murder' to her. We also learnt that she has steadfastly refused to name the genetic father and had a rather mistaken belief that at one point he would want to be involved. Being unemployed means that she has to court and keep the media on side so that they pay her for every photo and story, for the survival of these 14 children, their food, their nappies ($700 a week) and the hired help ($10,000 a month).

The film also went on to to show the consequences of the chaos that has developed from this unregulated fertility treatment, and an unquenchable patient's desire to have as many children as possible at enormous cost to many individuals. Dr Kamrava, the fertility specialist who treated Nadya, has been expelled by the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Her relationship with her mother has irretrievably broken down. Many Americans have vilified her, saying that she has only done this for the publicity and to make money. She has been demonised on the Internet, with consequent issues for her older children who can now watch online the mainly unpleasant criticism of their mother. She has had to fight in court to control the money that she is given for the children as the local authorities wanted to put the money into a trust administered by someone else. There are obviously enormous costs to her, but I was left puzzled that although her every day life seemed to be a constant 'battle' with paparazzi and criticism, she did not appear to be bowed down by this and remained remarkably cheerful and somewhat naively optimistic as if she was running a nursery rather than being a mother.

So who will bear the main costs of this sad and rather delusional tale? It has to be the children, ironically, the children that Nadya has fought so hard to conceive. Already one of her older children was 'acting out' with a fair amount of hostility, his aggression at having and living with an 'unavailable' mother. If Channel 4 revisited her every year I fear that the consequences of her actions, the action of the donor, the 'help' by the fertility specialist will have far reaching consequences for all of these children, who have had no choice in their parenting, and no ability to find out who their genetic father is. It is too easy to vilify Nadya; other people have also to take responsibility for their actions in this story.

 

Although I was hoping for illumination about Nadya's own psychopathology, I didn't receive much from this documentary and felt that one of the very few positives came from one of her helpers, who said words to the effect of 'the children are here, we can't undo this, so we just have to get on with it'.

SOURCES & REFERENCES

RELATED ARTICLES FROM THE BIONEWS ARCHIVE

06 June 2011 - by Kyrillos Georgiadis 
The US fertility doctor who helped 'octomum' Nadya Suleman give birth to a total of 14 children through repeated IVF treatments, has had his licence revoked by the Medical Board of California....
14 February 2011 - by MacKenna Roberts 
'Octomum' fertility doctor, Dr Michael Kamrava, could still be struck off despite a judge's recommendation to the contrary, according to a decision made by the Medical Board of California, the state's medical licensing body....
31 January 2011 - by Kyrillos Georgiadis 
A US judge has recommended that Dr Michael Kamrava, a Beverly Hills fertility doctor responsible for providing IVF to 'Octomum' Ms Nadya Suleman, should be allowed to continue practising as a doctor....
25 October 2010 - by Julianna Photopoulos 
US fertility doctor Dr Michael Kamrava implanted a total of 12 embryos into 'Octomum' Nadya Suleman, a licensing hearing is told....
19 July 2010 - by Louise Mallon 
The fertility doctor who helped 'Octomum' Nayda Suleman conceive octuplets transferred seven embryos to another woman, according to the Medical Board of California...

20 October 2009 - by Antony Blackburn-Starza 
The US fertility doctor responsible for transplanting six embryos into a woman who gave birth to octuplets last January has been struck off by the American Society for Reproductive Medicine (ASRM) - although he is still able to practice as membership of the professional society is only voluntary....
09 March 2009 - by MacKenna Roberts 
Public outrage over the IVF-conceived octuplets born in January to Nadya Suleman in California has led US legislators in Missouri and Georgia to propose laws that would limit the number of embryos a woman may have implanted when receiving a single fertility treatment. Georgia Senator Ralph Hudgens...
16 February 2009 - by MacKenna Roberts 
The decision to implant six embryos into Nadya Suleman leading to the birth of octuplets has attracted international opprobrium. The 33-year-old unemployed single mother already had six children conceived after IVF with the same fertility doctor; all aged below eight, including two-year-old twins and an autistic...

HAVE YOUR SAY
Be the first to have your say.

You need to or  to add comments.

By posting a comment you agree to abide by the BioNews terms and conditions


- click here to enquire about using this story.

Published by the Progress Educational Trust

CROSSING FRONTIERS

Public Conference
London
8 December 2017

Speakers include

Professor Azim Surani

Professor Magdalena Zernicka-Goetz

Professor Robin Lovell-Badge

Sally Cheshire

Professor Guido Pennings

Katherine Littler

Professor Allan Pacey

Dr Sue Avery

Professor Richard Anderson

Dr Elizabeth Garner

Dr Andy Greenfield

Dr Anna Smajdor

Dr Henry Malter

Vivienne Parry

Dr Helen O'Neill

Dr César Palacios-González

Philippa Taylor

Fiona Fox

Sarah Norcross

Sandy Starr


BOOK HERE

Good Fundraising Code

Become a Friend of PET HERE and give the Progress Educational Trust a regular donation