Subscribe to the BioNews newsletter for free

Advanced Search

Search for

Like the Progress Educational Trust on Facebook



TV Review: Orphan Black

19 May 2014

By Dr Lucy Freem

Appeared in BioNews 754

One of the many pleasures of Orphan Black is discovering how many distinct people the talented actress, Tatiana Maslany, can portray in a single scene. If you want to watch this show without spoilers, I will tell you only that it is a fast-paced, nail-biting thriller about human cloning, and urge you to stop reading immediately and go watch season one.

A quick summary of season one: Sarah Manning is on the run from her criminal past when a woman who looks exactly like her commits suicide in front of her eyes. Stealing the woman's identity on an impulse, Sarah ends up in more trouble than she could have imagined.

In a world where human cloning is considered science fiction, one bioscience company thirty years ago created a number of genetically identical embryos, hired surrogate mothers to bring them to term, and then hid the children amongst the general population as orphans. Their purpose: unknown. But three of the children, now women, have found each other, and they want answers.

Sarah and her 'genetic identicals' – no clone progenitor has yet been identified – are all very different women who share only intelligence, competence and a quick temper. Some, like brittle 'soccer mom' Alison, only want a safe life. Others, like dreadlocked scientist Cosima, want to understand why they were created, and are willing to compromise ethics and safety to get information. Although they are genetically identical, Sarah, Alison and Cosima's different priorities test their alliance to the limit. Sarah is however the only one of the eight clones so far encountered who can have biological children: a significant plot point.

As the series goes on it becomes clear that the 'cloning' process is not without consequences. Some of the clones are falling ill, and nearly all are infertile. There are some hints that this infertility may be a deliberate act of control - when your genome is someone else's intellectual property, reproduction is a dangerous infringement. The science behind the plot is carefully plausible, though advanced (and illegal).

The shadowy eugenics institute that created the clone-siblings clashes with an even more terrifying group of religious extremists in a battle for control of the clones' lives. The women have a choice between enemies who treat them either as experimental subjects to be monitored or as unholy abominations. The plot raises questions about agency, consent, control of personal genetic information, the harms of non-invasive research and the nature of family: biological, adopted, found or absent.

Having gained enemies and lost trusted allies, Sarah is now fleeing these powerful forces, trying to find her kidnapped daughter and avoid both the company that created her and the extremists who want her dead. The second season of Orphan Black will be one to watch.

The second season of Orphan Black is now showing on BBC Three.



14 April 2014 - by Chee Hoe Low 
Although this show jumped to conclusions about what the DNA of famous people could tell us, its ridiculous premise was amusing enough to keep viewers entertained...
06 January 2014 - by Dr Naqash Raja 
In the first of three Christmas lectures with the theme 'life fantastic' from the Royal Institution, Dr Allison Woollard answers the ever-important question: 'where do I come from?'...
07 October 2013 - by Professor Eric Blyth 
The British TV soap opera, Coronation Street, has become an established national institution since the first episode was screened in December 1960. It is on several nights each week and is set in 'Weatherfield', a fictional working class neighbourhood in Manchester....
17 October 2011 - by Daniel Malynn 
'Me, My Sex and I' is a documentary about people who are born neither entirely male nor female. I must state at the outset that this programme is about the sex of the individual, and should not be confused with gender, which is how people identify themselves (something that many other TV reviews have got wrong in describing this programme). As the show makes clear, sex is not an 'either or' for many people; the real buzz word here is 'ambiguous'....

Be the first to have your say.

You need to or  to add comments.

By posting a comment you agree to abide by the BioNews terms and conditions

- click here to enquire about using this story.

Published by the Progress Educational Trust


Public Conference
8 December 2017

Speakers include

Professor Azim Surani

Professor Magdalena Zernicka-Goetz

Professor Robin Lovell-Badge

Sally Cheshire

Professor Guido Pennings

Katherine Littler

Professor Allan Pacey

Dr Sue Avery

Professor Richard Anderson

Dr Elizabeth Garner

Dr Andy Greenfield

Dr Anna Smajdor

Dr Henry Malter

Vivienne Parry

Dr Helen O'Neill

Dr César Palacios-González

Philippa Taylor

Fiona Fox

Sarah Norcross

Sandy Starr


Good Fundraising Code

Become a Friend of PET HERE and give the Progress Educational Trust a regular donation