Subscribe to the BioNews newsletter for free

Login
Advanced Search

Search for
BioNews


Print Page Follow BioNews on Twitter BioNews RSS feed

Like the Progress Educational Trust on Facebook



King's College London - Health: More than a medical matter






'Egg sharing' affects validity of a woman's consent

07 October 2005

By Veronica English

Deputy Head of Medical Ethics, British Medical Association

Appeared in BioNews 329
On 7 October, the UK's Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority (HFEA) published the results of its spermegg and embryo donation (SEED) review. The British Medical Association (BMA) welcomes the majority of the conclusions in the report and particularly the principle that donation of gametes should be 'cost neutral' - that is that people should neither lose out nor profit from their donation. This principle underpins the report's conclusions on payment which say that donors should be paid only out of pocket expenses and compensation for loss of earnings. When it comes to benefits in kind - and specifically compensated egg sharing, however, this principle no longer seems to apply. The offer of free or reduced price IVF treatment is clearly a benefit from which donors profit.

It may seem strange to be arguing against a practice in which, in theory at least, all parties win - donors get the treatment they want, recipients get donated eggs and the clinic gets to help twice as many people who need assistance to have children. There are clear compassionate arguments for supporting egg sharing, so why does the BMA believe it should not be permitted?

If IVF treatment were available free of charge to anyone who needed it, we would have no objection to people choosing to donate some of their eggs for the treatment of others. But, it isn't. It is largely available only to those who can afford to pay, and to pay a very considerable sum of money. For those who desperately want children but cannot afford to pay for treatment, egg sharing represents their only option. Where there is such a large inducement to donate eggs, questions must be raised about the validity of the consent and whether it meets the requirement that, in order to be valid, consent must be given voluntarily and free from pressure.

There is a real risk that women who would not, under other circumstances, offer to donate eggs for the treatment of others, sweep aside their concerns in order to achieve their goal of having a child. Although all women enter IVF with the hope it will be successful, not all women will end up with a child. When treatment fails it can be devastating. How much more difficult is it likely to be for a woman who knows that someone else may be pregnant using her eggs? Given the recent changes to the rules on anonymity, she also knows that a child born following her donation may make contact more than 18 years later. This is a decision that can have life-long implications - it is not a decision that should be entered into lightly and nor is it a decision that women should be given an inducement to make.

 

SOURCES & REFERENCES

RELATED ARTICLES FROM THE BIONEWS ARCHIVE

21 August 2006 - by Professor Guido Pennings 
Egg sharing remains a highly controversial procedure. The discussion on whether or not egg sharing in return for a free or reduced IVF cycle constitutes a kind of payment has been going on since the very beginning of the practice. However, from an ethical point of view, it might be... [Read More]
07 October 2005 - by BioNews 
The UK's Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority (HFEA) has published the results of its sperm, egg and embryo donation (SEED) review, which included a survey of UK clinics and a review of current scientific and clinical evidence in this area. An accompanying public consultation, which closed in February 2005, sought... [Read More]

07 October 2005 - by BioNews 
The UK's Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority (HFEA) has published the results of its sperm, egg and embryo donation (SEED) review, which included a survey of UK clinics and a review of current scientific and clinical evidence in this area. An accompanying public consultation, which closed in February 2005, sought... [Read More]

HAVE YOUR SAY
Be the first to have your say.

You need to Login or Register to add comments.

By posting a comment you agree to abide by the BioNews terms and conditions

 


 

- click here to enquire about using this story.

Printer Friendly Page

Published by the Progress Educational Trust
RISK ASSESSMENT:
BREAST CANCER, PREDICTION AND SCREENING
FREE public event in central London, 6.30pm on Thursday 8 May 2014 - find out more HERE

DataLabel Supplying Printed Labels To The UK For Over 15 Years

ANNIVERSARY APPEAL
Please donate HERE, so that the Progress Educational Trust can continue throughout 2014 (and beyond) while keeping BioNews FREE for you to read

The Progress Educational Trust was shortlisted for the Charity Times Awards 2011

Advertise your products and services HERE - click for further details

Good Fundraising Code

Become a Friend of PET HERE, and give the Progress Educational Trust a regular donation