Subscribe to the BioNews newsletter for free

Login
Advanced Search

Search for
BioNews

Like the Progress Educational Trust on Facebook


 


 

Investigation casts doubt on controversial Italian stem cell treatments

15 July 2013

By Nishat Hyder

Appeared in BioNews 713

Davide Vannoni, head of the Stamina Foundation in Turin, Italy, and pioneer of a controversial stem cell therapy, has once again hit the headlines amid allegations of poor research methodology. An investigation by Nature has revealed that the planned €3 million Italian government-sponsored clinical trial of a stem-cell treatment is based on unsound data.

The stem cell treatment in question (reported in BioNews 707) relies on differentiating bone-marrow cells into nerve cells in order to treat neurodegenerative conditions conditions. Vannoni has already faced criticism on grounds of safety and efficacy. Now, further evidence has emerged casting doubt on the premise of this therapy.

Bone-marrow cells have been shown to successfully differentiate into bone, fat or cartilage cells, however 'no-one has ever been able to convincingly show that bone-marrow cells can be converted into nerve cells', says Professor Elena Cattaneo, director of the Laboratory of Stem Cell Biology and Pharmacology of Neurodegenerative Diseases at the University of Milan.

Vannoni has been slow to reveal details of his method, instead directing queries to an application in 2010 to the US Patent and Trademark Office (PTO). The Nature investigation suggests that key parts of the method cited in this application, including a micrograph, are replicated from a Russian and Ukrainian research paper published in 2003. Although the Russian and Ukrainian paper also investigated differentiating bone marrow cells into nerve cells, the research was carried out under markedly different experimental conditions.

Elena Schegel'skaya, a molecular biologist at the Kharkiv National Medical University and co-author of the 2003 paper has confirmed duplication from the 2003 paper. She points out a further micrograph is apparently duplicated from a 2006 paper that she published in Ukrainian Neurosurgical Journal. The US PTO rejected Vannoni's application (albeit with leave to resubmit), citing inter alia insufficient details on methodology.

The clinical trial, which was to begin 1 July 2013, has been delayed pending the submission documents detailing the scientific method to the government-appointed committee that will oversee the administration of the trial. This is not the first time Vannoni has delayed the delivery of these documents.

Neither Vannoni nor the Stamina Foundation has commented directly on the findings of Nature's investigation. However, Vannoni has posted on his Facebook page about the necessity of 'greater guarantees of objectivity' before presenting details of trial results and a full research protocol, as requested by the Italian parliament.

A Nature editorial following the investigation states that: 'Movement of any therapy into a clinical trial requires much more transparency. It also needs a solid theoretical basis for why it should work, backed by scientific evidence, either published or presented confidentially to the appropriate authority, in this case the Italian Medicines Agency. Vannoni has not provided this'. This sentiment has been echoed by others; Dr Irving Weissman, director of the Stanford Institute for Stem Cell Biology and Regenerative Medicine in California, has questioned the wisdom of the Italian government in supporting this trial.

The Huffington Post (Italy) reports that Vannoni has defended his work and responded to the Nature article in the post on his Facebook page. It reports Vannoni as saying there are hundreds of people in Brescia waiting to be treated by Stamina's methods.

SOURCES & REFERENCES
The Scientist | 03 July 2013
 
Nature | 02 July 2013
 
Gazzetta del sud | 03 July 2013
 

RELATED ARTICLES FROM THE BIONEWS ARCHIVE

21 November 2016 - by Rachel Siden 
Italian prosecutors are investigating whether discredited stem-cell entrepreneur Davide Vannoni is continuing to offer his unproven therapies in eastern Europe...
23 September 2013 - by Nishat Hyder 
An expert panel of scientists has issued a report advising the Italian Government against continuing to support a controversial stem cell therapy, deeming it 'unscientific'....

03 June 2013 - by Nishat Hyder 
The Italian Senate has approved an 18-month, €3 million clinical trial of a controversial stem cell-based therapy. The vote, on 22 May 2013, will also allow a hospital to continue to treat twelve patients already undergoing the contested treatment...
28 May 2013 - by Richard Fadok 
A group of anonymous scientists has voiced concerns about a controversial stem cell finding published online in Cell earlier this month, causing the journal to begin an investigation...
07 January 2013 - by Dr Linda Wijlaars 
Bone fragments were removed from the eyelid of a woman after a facelift that used her own stem cells yielded some unexpected results...
16 July 2012 - by Cait McDonagh 
Six patients in California, USA, are suing a South Korean company and others for allegedly misleading them about the benefits of stem cell treatments sold to them...

HAVE YOUR SAY
Be the first to have your say.

You need to or  to add comments.

By posting a comment you agree to abide by the BioNews terms and conditions


- click here to enquire about using this story.

Published by the Progress Educational Trust

CROSSING FRONTIERS

Public Conference
London
8 December 2017

Speakers include

Professor Azim Surani

Professor Magdalena Zernicka-Goetz

Professor Robin Lovell-Badge

Sally Cheshire

Professor Guido Pennings

Katherine Littler

Professor Allan Pacey

Dr Sue Avery

Professor Richard Anderson

Dr Elizabeth Garner

Dr Andy Greenfield

Dr Anna Smajdor

Dr Henry Malter

Vivienne Parry

Dr Helen O'Neill

Dr César Palacios-González

Philippa Taylor

Fiona Fox

Sarah Norcross

Sandy Starr


BOOK HERE

Good Fundraising Code

Become a Friend of PET HERE and give the Progress Educational Trust a regular donation