Subscribe to the BioNews newsletter for free

Login
Advanced Search

Search for
BioNews

Like the Progress Educational Trust on Facebook




 

IVF sex selection ban is unjustified, says ethicist

08 July 2013

By Matthew Young

Appeared in BioNews 712

A report produced by bioethicists from Keele University has concluded that there is no justifiable basis on which to ban IVF sex selection in the UK.

The report, Eugenics and the Ethics of Selective Reproduction, was authored by Professor Stephen Wilkinson, now at Lancaster University, and Dr Eve Garrard, now of the University of Manchester. It concluded that it would be ethical to offer techniques to choose the sex of future children, based on the parents' preferences.

'People who would prefer their new baby to be of a particular sex often have their own very personal reasons for this, to do with their family's particular circumstances of history. We didn't find any ethical arguments sufficient to justify a blanket ban on these people seeking sex selection', said Professor Wilkinson.

The report examined 'social' IVF sex selection in a British context and found 'no reason' to 'expect harm to future children or wider society if these techniques were made available for social reasons within our regulated fertility treatment sector'. The techniques involve analysing cells at the embryonic or pre-embryonic stage in vitro to determine their sex before implantation. Sex selection is only currently permitted in the UK to avoid the birth of babies with sex-linked inherited disorders.

Commenting on the ethical opposition to choosing the sex of future children, Professor Jackie Leach Scully, co-director of Policy Ethics and Life Sciences Research Centre at Newcastle University, said: 'One of the arguments against it is the possibility of sexism because by choosing or wanting to choose the sex of your child you are exhibiting some kind of preference and that would be sexism'.

However, the report found that discrimination and sexism would not be relevant factors for many in choosing the sex of a baby. Instead, it said some people might express a preference for a sex for family balancing reasons and place value on a particular sex being represented in a family. Concerns about sexism, although potentially legitimate, were not considered significant enough to justify the current ban. 'The less sexist society is, the more acceptable sex selection is likely to be', Professor Wilkinson said.

It is known that in some areas of China and India, significant imbalances in the sex ratios of certain populations have arisen, despite 'social' sex selection being illegal. In some Chinese provinces there can be over 130 boys under five years old for every 100 girls. These imbalances have shown to cause wider social problems, with some men unable to find a long-term partner. The authors conclude, however, that a sex ratio imbalance would not occur in the general population if sex-selection techniques were to be offered within a strong regulatory framework.

The authors of the study concluded that while there is no justifiable reason to ban 'social' IVF sex selection, it would not be right for sex selection procedures to be funded by the taxpayer. They also agreed that proper regulations would need to put in place to reduce the chance of any harmful effects occurring as the result of sex selection treatments being carried out for non-medical reasons.

SOURCES & REFERENCES
Keele University (press release) | 02 July 2013
 
The Telegraph | 03 July 2013
 
The Scotsman | 05 July 2013
 
The Independent | 03 July 2013
 

RELATED ARTICLES FROM THE BIONEWS ARCHIVE

01 August 2016 - by Lone Hørlyck 
Australian IVF clinics are calling for parents to be permitted to choose the sex of their third child if they already have two children of the same gender...
23 March 2015 - by Sophie McLachlan 
The nutrient-filled liquid used to grow embryos during IVF might affect the resulting male to female birth ratio, a study suggests...
08 December 2014 - by Professor John Galloway 
Although the word was not actually used (or at least I did not hear it), this was a polemic making the case for 'eugenics'...
28 October 2013 - by María Victoria Rivas Llanos 
Sex selection in IVF as a method of avoiding autism has been approved for the first time by health authorities in Western Australia...
09 September 2013 - by Dr Anna Smajdor 
The prospect of eugenics has re-emerged in multiple new guises. The polarising power of this concept is part of its fascination, but this is not necessarily fruitful for debate or policy-making. In their booklet, Stephen Wilkinson and Eve Garrard address this problem...

03 September 2012 - by Ayesha Ahmad 
Dr Jeffrey Steinberg, a British IVF specialist who is now director of a pair of private clinics in the USA has claimed that dozens of couples see him every year to select the sex of their babies...
23 January 2012 - by Dr Rebecca Robey 
A test has been developed to determine the sex of a fetus from only five weeks old. The test relies on a blood sample from the mother and therefore carries no risk to the child...
28 March 2011 - by Stevienna de Saille 
The use of pre-implantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) for sex selection has proven extremely controversial in the UK, where the procedure is illegal unless medically justified to avoid producing a child with a sex-linked genetic disorder, such as Duchenne muscular dystrophy. One reason often given for the restrictions is the fear that the technology will be used mainly to select male embryos...
21 February 2011 - by Antony Blackburn-Starza 
A Liverpool hospital has said it will investigate allegations that one of its doctors had apparently offered to make arrangements for an undercover reporter posing as a prospective patient to undergo a sex-selection procedure for family balancing abroad...
24 January 2011 - by Leo Perfect 
An Australian couple are going to court to fight for their right to choose the sex of their next child. They applied to use IVF with gender selection technology to guarantee a daughter, but an independent bioethics panel rejected their request...

HAVE YOUR SAY
Be the first to have your say.

You need to or  to add comments.

By posting a comment you agree to abide by the BioNews terms and conditions


- click here to enquire about using this story.

Published by the Progress Educational Trust
Advertise your products and services HERE - click for further details

Good Fundraising Code

Become a Friend of PET HERE and give the Progress Educational Trust a regular donation