Subscribe to the BioNews newsletter for free

Login
Advanced Search

Search for
BioNews

Like the Progress Educational Trust on Facebook


 


 

Book Review: Transhumanist Dreams and Dystopian Nightmares

11 March 2013

By Professor John Galloway

Appeared in BioNews 696

Transhumanist Dreams and Dystopian Nightmares: The Promise and Peril of Genetic Engineering

By Professor Maxwell Mehlman

Published by Johns Hopkins University Press

ISBN-10: 1421406691, ISBN-13: 978-1421406695

Buy this book from Amazon UK

'Transhumanist Dreams and Dystopian Nightmares: The Promise and Peril of Genetic Engineering' by Professor Maxwell Mehlman


Perhaps fortuitously, I started to read Maxwell Mehlman's book at the same time as Roy Porter's 'A Short History of Madness'. It was then difficult not to muse on what Jonathan Swift might have made of 'transhumanising scientists'. His satirising of scientists 'infected with lunacy' in the eighteenth century provides a hard to avoid parallel with Mehlman's very much not satirical account of biologists of the twentieth century.

Every school child now knows that molecular genetics is set to transform the world as we know it. Although exactly who 'we' are, is not specified; nor are we always told whether the transformation will be for good or ill. We can be reasonably certain though that most of the world's existing population will be dead before genetics' claims for medicine have any effect on them.

What Mehlman has picked up on is science's self-regarding notion that its purpose is to perfect the 'human race'. In other words, that it exists to correct the historical, including evolutionary, mistakes of the past. This is something nineteenth and early twentieth century scientists were hot on. They were keen to show that society's ills, criminality, moral decrepitude, weak mindedness, and above all, poverty, were biological in origin. If bad traits could be removed, all would be well. The technological fixes were 'obvious': forced sterilisation, incarceration and sexual segregation and, if all else failed, euthanasia and mass murder.

These measures are of course now widely frowned upon, although the notion of removing bad traits is still with us, and further extended with thoughts of enhancing the good traits. People might be made more intelligent, better looking, increasingly creative and so on. The genetics, argued to be able to remove diseases, might equally be deployed in the service of this even greater good.

Genetics offers the possibility, say scientists, not simply of ameliorating the human predicament but of transcending it. The term, 'transhumanisation' has been coined - directing evolution by genetic manipulation to produce the best possible human cultivars (or even a new species).

Of course this raises the issue of what 'best' means and, in any event, who decides. Exactly the problem Darwin himself faced, which was solved by Wallace and Herbert Spencer - namely reproductive success. But once 'best' has to be decided by people, 'bests' will proliferate. Look no further than horse or pigeon breeding. That brings us to Mehlman's book which, as the title suggests, is an account of some of the speculation on where genetic modification may lead.

'Evolutionary engineering could open us up to pleasures whose blissfulness vastly exceeds what any human has yet experienced', Mehlman cites of one scientist, and of another, 'The Holy Grail of enhancement is immortality'. Novelists, no doubt for good marketing reasons, tend to favour a nightmare dystopian scenario created by scientific hubris. They can be accused of exaggeration and unwarranted extrapolation. But as Mehlman comprehensively demonstrates, so can scientists, who are just as anxious to market their contribution to understanding in pursuit of fame and fortune.

Reading Mehlman, yet again I am struck by how little science seems to know of the human world; of its history (including science's own) and of the human predicament. How parochial a sovereign state science can be. As Mehlman points out scientists are not that strong on social policy, to put it mildly.

If the world does not face up to its problems and soon, evolution in the Darwinian sense, will solve them for us. So why not leave the last word to Darwin. 'If the misery of the poor be caused not by the laws of nature, but by our institutions, great is our sin'. Get real, science.


Buy Transhumanist Dreams and Dystopian Nightmares: The Promise and Peril of Genetic Engineering from Amazon UK.

SOURCES & REFERENCES

RELATED ARTICLES FROM THE BIONEWS ARCHIVE

27 June 2016 - by Rachel Siden 
Hundreds of genes become active after death and can stay active for up to four days, according to a study...
31 May 2016 - by Kriss Fearon 
'Produce' is an intriguing and believable portrayal of how parents might act when faced with the chance to decide what genes to give to their future child...
06 October 2014 - by James Storm 
Russell Blackford's venture into heated human enhancement rhetoric feels very much like being plunged into the world of Andrew Niccol's 1997 film, Gattaca...
11 August 2014 - by James Storm 
Nicholas Agar has endeared himself to the enhancement debate by being a little bit afraid of 'post humans' – the real life supermen who could very well use their powers for evil and enslave the rest of humanity. It may come as no surprise then that Agar's latest venture into the debate continues in much the same vein....
02 December 2013 - by Amy Reed 
How much of a child's health and wellbeing should depend on the parents? When is it acceptable for this to come under state control? These are the questions presented to the reader in Ken Macleod's dystopian novel, 'Intrusion'...

10 September 2012 - by Dr Daniel Grimes 
In her new book, 'The Epigenetics Revolution', Nessa Carey argues that we are in the midst of the next great upheaval in biological thinking...
03 September 2012 - by Suzanne Elvidge 
While it's not designed to be something that is read from cover to cover, this textbook is clearly and well written, readable and accessible, with regular call-out boxes providing examples and case studies...
23 July 2012 - by Dr Morven Shearer 
One of the difficulties in teaching medical students about the ethics of clinical genetics is that it's often hard to get them to appreciate the multitude of problems raised in everyday practice...
02 July 2012 - by Dr Iain Brassington 
Back in my bar-tending days, we had as regular customers a small group of men who would spend the evening huddled around a table talking at volume about current affairs. We used to eavesdrop on their conversations: it was hard not to. For the most part, what they tended to say was robustly weird, with essays into the profoundly bizarre. Reading John Glad's 'Future Human Evolution', I couldn't help but think of them...
12 March 2012 - by Dr Rebecca Hill 
Genome sequencing for all, the abuse of stored genetic data and red tape halting research are just some of the issues the NHS will have to deal with this year, according to Sir John Burn, professor of clinical genetics at the University of Newcastle, chair of the British Society for Human Genetics (BSHG)...

HAVE YOUR SAY
Be the first to have your say.

You need to or  to add comments.

By posting a comment you agree to abide by the BioNews terms and conditions


- click here to enquire about using this story.

Published by the Progress Educational Trust

CROSSING FRONTIERS

Public Conference
London
8 December 2017

Speakers include

Professor Azim Surani

Professor Magdalena Zernicka-Goetz

Professor Robin Lovell-Badge

Sally Cheshire

Professor Guido Pennings

Katherine Littler

Professor Allan Pacey

Dr Sue Avery

Professor Richard Anderson

Dr Elizabeth Garner

Dr Andy Greenfield

Dr Anna Smajdor

Dr Henry Malter

Vivienne Parry

Dr Helen O'Neill

Dr César Palacios-González

Philippa Taylor

Fiona Fox

Sarah Norcross

Sandy Starr


BOOK HERE

Good Fundraising Code

Become a Friend of PET HERE and give the Progress Educational Trust a regular donation