Subscribe to the BioNews newsletter for free

Login
Advanced Search

Search for
BioNews


Print Page Follow BioNews on Twitter BioNews RSS feed

Like the Progress Educational Trust on Facebook







Court of Human Rights overturns Costa Rica's ban on IVF

07 January 2013

By Antony Blackburn-Starza

Appeared in BioNews 687

The Inter-American Court of Human Rights (IACHR) has overturned a prohibition on IVF in Costa Rica saying that it infringed provisions under the American Convention on Human Rights.

The ban was originally implemented by the Costa Rican Government in an effort to protect human life. Costa Rica's Supreme Court ruled in 2000 that the practice of discarding 'spare' embryos in IVF was unconstitutional as it infringed the right to life under article 4 of the American Convention of Human Rights, which states: 'Every person has the right to have his life respected... from the moment of conception'. It said IVF also violated the Costa Rican constitution.

Nature News Blog comments that although some other countries have not legislated to regulate IVF or to ensure access, Costa Rica is the only country known to implement a total ban.

Nine infertile couples petitioned the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights in 2001 against the ban, which issued a statement indicating that Costa Rica's prohibition infringed a number of rights. The IACHR heard the case in September last year and published its decision, dated 28 November, at the end of the year.

It ruled that Costa Rica's prohibition on IVF violated the rights to privacy and family, and also infringed the principle of non-discrimination. It said infertility was a disease recognised by the World Health Organisation and that infertile people should be granted access to fertility treatment. It was disproportionate to require infertility couples to seek treatment abroad. Crucially, the IACHR said an embryo could not be a 'person' and considered that the 'moment of conception' occurs after implantation, and not fertilisation.

The IACHR ordered that Costa Rica must take steps to remove the prohibition on IVF and make it available to people who need it. The Government must also introduce the regulation of fertility treatment and also make IVF available under its social health system. The IACHR also ordered that the state must pay compensation for 'material and moral' damages and the reimbursement of costs or expenses. The claimants received US$5,000 each in compensation for being required to travel abroad for IVF and US$20,000 for 'distress, anxiety, uncertainty and frustration' as a result of having been prevented from exercising 'autonomous rights'.

Piero Tozzi, legal counsel with the Alliance Defending Freedom, an organisation of Christian leaders, said: 'A preliminary reading of the ruling indicates that the Court elevated secondary rights-such as the right to privacy, a right to personal autonomy, and a right to sexual and reproductive health-above the right to life, which by necessity takes precedence over all the other rights'.

The prohibition was overturned by five of the six judges of the IACHR. Judge Eduardo Vio Grossi, dissenting, said the interpretation of 'conception' went too far and the matter should be left to individual states, reports website PNCI.

A statement from the Government said it will comply with the decision. The Minister of Communication, Francisco Chacon, said: 'The decision of the Court shall be complied with in its entirety, as it is respectful of international law, one of the fundamental sources of our rule of law'. The Attorney General's office said that it has not yet fully analysed the decision but the Government will consider what actions are necessary to comply with measures laid down by the IACHR.

Dr David Adamson of the International Federation of Fertility Societies (IFFS), said: 'This decision of the Human Rights Court brings Costa Rica, and most of the Americas, into line with the views of the main international medical organisations working in the field of reproduction'. IFFS President, Professor Joe Leigh Simpson, called the ruling a 'landmark decision' that will have an impact across the world. 'It means that denying access to fertility treatment is denying a human right. Infertility is a disease, and this decision means that people have a right to be able to be treated for this disease, including having access to IVF', he said.

The case will be closed once compliance is observed by the IACHR.

 

SOURCES & REFERENCES
Parliamentary Network for Critical Issues | 21 December 2012
 
Inter-American Court of Human Rights | 28 November 2012
 
República de Costa Rica | 20 December 2012
 
Nature News Blog | 28 December 2012
 
Turtle Bay and Beyond, Piero A. Tozzi | 21 December 2012
 

RELATED ARTICLES FROM THE BIONEWS ARCHIVE

07 May 2013 - by Jessica Ware 
Poland's justice minister has been dismissed from his position after weeks of conflict with the country's prime minister over state-funded IVF and civil partnership... [Read More]
21 January 2013 - by Cathy Holding 
Women who conceive using IVF are at a higher risk of lethal blood clots during pregnancy compared to women who conceive naturally... [Read More]

19 November 2012 - by Antony Blackburn-Starza 
A Romanian woman has argued, unsuccessfully, that a decision to relocate her stored embryos to another clinic, denying her a choice of a doctor, amounted to a breach of her private and family life with regard to her ability to have a child through IVF using those embryos... [Read More]
03 September 2012 - by Rosie Beauchamp 
Italy has violated the rights of a couple carrying cystic fibrosis by preventing them from screening embryos using PGD, the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) has ruled. The Strasbourg-based court ordered the Italian government to pay the couple 17,500 euros in damages and expenses.... [Read More]
23 January 2012 - by Professor Richard Storrow 
Procreative liberty and the right to legal recognition of parent-child relationships continue to be prominent themes in disputes between individual citizens and government over access to assisted reproduction. The judiciary has been largely reluctant to state whether resort to reproductive technology is a human right... [Read More]
14 November 2011 - by Jessica Ware 
IVF using donated egg or sperm other than from a spouse will remain banned in Austria. This was the final decision made by the Grand Chamber of the European Court of Human Rights (the Court) on 3 November in the closing of the case SH and others v Austria.... [Read More]
19 September 2011 - by Dr Morven Shearer and Dr Sheryl Vanderpoel 
Costa Rica is being taken to the Inter-American Court of Human Rights (IACHR) for failing to lift a national ban on IVF, which is sometimes the only medical intervention that can resolve a case of infertility or sub-fertility (1).The Costa Rican law making IVF illegal came into force in 2000. The country's Constitutional Court ruled IVF violated Article Four of the American Convention on Human Rights - 'the right to life' - by defining life from the moment of fertilisation (2). The IACHR orde... [Read More]

HAVE YOUR SAY
Be the first to have your say.

You need to or  to add comments.

By posting a comment you agree to abide by the BioNews terms and conditions

 


 

- click here to enquire about using this story.

Printer Friendly Page

Published by the Progress Educational Trust
PET CONFERENCE
COMMERCIALISATION OF LIFE


Lord Robert Winston, Professor of Science and Society at Imperial College London and speaker at the Progress Educational Trust's conference 'The Commercialisation of Life', taking place in central London on Tuesday 2 December

London, 2 December
Click HERE for details

FREE EVENT
GENOMIC MEDICINE NEEDS YOU


'Genomic Medicine Needs You - Do You Need Genomic Medicine?', a FREE public event being organised by the Progress Educational Trust in central Oxford on the evening of Thursday 16 October 2014

Oxford, 16 October
Click HERE for details

Good Fundraising Code

Become a Friend of PET HERE, and give the Progress Educational Trust a regular donation