Subscribe to the BioNews newsletter for free

Login
Advanced Search

Search for
BioNews

Like the Progress Educational Trust on Facebook


The Fertility Show


 

Improved prenatal test may better detect genetic diseases

10 December 2012

By Dr Lux Fatimathas

Appeared in BioNews 685

More sensitive prenatal testing of fetal DNA could improve the detection of genetic diseases, studies find. Research testing the use of chromosomal microarray technology to detect genetic defects in the fetus show improved precision compared to current karyotyping techniques.

'Based on our findings, we believe that microarray will and should replace karyotyping as the standard for evaluating chromosomal abnormalities in fetuses', said Professor Ronald Wapner, lead author of the study at Columbia University Medical Center, USA.

The researchers analysed fetal DNA isolated from 4,400 mothers who underwent amniocentesis or chorionic villus sampling. The women selected were either older mothers or those whose fetuses showed signs of developmental abnormalities from initial ultrasound screening. The fetal DNA samples were split in two, with one half being sent for chromosomal microarray testing and the other for standard karyotyping.

Professor Wapner told Bloomberg Businessweek: 'The biggest advantage of microarray is it can give us a lot more information. We are expanding the information a person can get out of prenatal testing, identifying additional and more serious problems'.

Karyotyping looks at the overall shape of the chromosomes, looking for obvious physical defects. However chromosomal microarray tests look at the DNA sequence to find mutations that could be harmful.

Researchers found in six percent of cases where suspect structural changes were detected via ultrasound but karyoptying was normal, the microarray tests were able to pick up genetic defects that might explain these changes. 'This allows us to better counsel a patient', remarked Professor Wapner to Bloomberg Businessweek.

In a separate study, led by researchers at the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, Maryland, USA, this technology was used to investigate potential genetic causes for stillbirth. Karyotyping identified the cause for stillbirth in 71 percent of cases, while chromosomal microarray technology achieved this in 87 percent of cases.

Although microarray technology can produce more genetic information than karyotyping, it costs up three times more to administer. The significance of the genetic data is also not always understood.

'These reports highlight the power and complexity, and some of the pitfalls, of using new genomic technology in clinical practice', wrote Dr Lorraine Dugoff, from the Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, in an editorial published alongside the studies.

Currently chromosomal microarray testing requires an invasive procedure, with a small risk of a miscarriage, to isolate the fetal DNA, making it unlikely to be offered as standard care for pregnant women. However techniques are now being developed to isolate fetal DNA from maternal blood samples (see BioNews 683).

'We hope that in the future - when microarray can be done non-invasively - every woman who wishes will be offered microarray, so that she can have as complete information as possible about her pregnancy', said Professor Wapner.

The studies were published in the New England Journal of Medicine.

SOURCES & REFERENCES
Bloomberg Businessweek | 06 December 2012
 
New England Journal of Medicine | 06 December 2012
 
New England Journal of Medicine | 06 December 2012
 
Columbia University Medical Center (press release) | 05 December 2012
 
CBS News | 06 December 2012
 

RELATED ARTICLES FROM THE BIONEWS ARCHIVE

11 August 2014 - by Dr Victoria Burchell 
Expectant mothers should be offered earlier screening for rare chromosomal conditions, the UK National Screening Committee (UK NSC) recommends...
10 June 2013 - by James Brooks 
A test using only a blood sample taken from a pregnant woman is more reliable than current checks in indicating the likelihood of Down's syndrome, say researchers...
07 May 2013 - by James Brooks 
I know what they say about yesterday's news and today's fish and chip paper but what I'm about to tell you is six months old and still a little way off as a headline...
14 January 2013 - by Dr Daniel Grimes 
US biotech company Verinata Health has reported sequencing fetal DNA taken from pregnant women's blood to test for genetic abnormalities...

26 November 2012 - by Dr Lux Fatimathas 
Non-invasive pre-natal screening for certain abnormalities in fetal chromosomes should be offered to at-risks mothers, recommends the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists...
13 December 2010 - by Julianna Photopoulos 
Scientists have scanned the entire DNA of an unborn child from the mother's blood sample for the first time to safely check for genetic disorders...
12 May 2009 - by Ben Jones 
The effectiveness of a prenatal test for Down syndrome has been thrown into doubt after its developers, Sequenom, admitted that study data had been 'mishandled' by its employees. The company, which had been producing apparently strong results in house for its DNA and RNA blood testing products...
08 December 2008 - by Evelyn Harvey 
By Evelyn Harvey: A new method for early detection of genetic diseases in unborn babies using a simple blood test can detect the inherited condition beta-thalassemia, according to a study published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. Although the technique, which analyses cell free fetal DNA (cffDNA) present...
13 October 2008 - by Lorna Stewart 
Scientists at Stanford University in California, US have developed a new non-invasive prenatal test for Down's syndrome. Stephen Quake and colleagues successfully identified presence and absence of fetal chromosomal abnormality in 18 pregnant women from maternal blood samples. The work is published this month in the journal...

HAVE YOUR SAY
Be the first to have your say.

You need to or  to add comments.

By posting a comment you agree to abide by the BioNews terms and conditions


- click here to enquire about using this story.

Published by the Progress Educational Trust

CROSSING FRONTIERS

Moving the Boundaries of Human Reproduction

Public Conference
London
8 December 2017

Speakers include

Professor Azim Surani

Professor Magdalena Zernicka-Goetz

Professor Robin Lovell-Badge

Sally Cheshire

Professor Guido Pennings

Katherine Littler

Professor Allan Pacey

Dr Sue Avery

Professor Richard Anderson

Dr Elizabeth Garner

Dr Jacques Cohen

Dr Anna Smajdor

Dr Andy Greenfield

Vivienne Parry

Dr Helen O'Neill

Dr César Palacios-González

Philippa Taylor

Fiona Fox

Sarah Norcross


BOOK HERE

Good Fundraising Code

Become a Friend of PET HERE and give the Progress Educational Trust a regular donation