Subscribe to the BioNews newsletter for free

Login
Advanced Search

Search for
BioNews

Like the Progress Educational Trust on Facebook


The Fertility Show


 

Myriad Genetics holding genetic data as trade secrets

05 November 2012

By Antony Blackburn-Starza

Appeared in BioNews 680

A group of academics has accused Myriad Genetics, the US biotech company that holds patents on the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genetic tests for increased risk of breast cancer, of keeping secret clinical data obtained from the tests by saying the information is commercially sensitive. The paper, published in the European Journal of Human Genetics, says this practice could raise the costs of BRCA1/2 testing and make some results more difficult to interpret.

'Interpreting the clinical significance of genomic information depends on broad access to DNA sequence variants and clinical information about those tested', said lead author Professor Robert Cook-Deegan, Sanford School of Public Policy, Duke University, USA. The paper argues that such is the importance of interpreting BRCA1/2 tests accurately, information that enables researchers to do this should be shared and made freely available.

Analysis of the BRCA1/2 genes can lead to unknown mutations being picked up, known as 'variants of unknown significance' (VUS), making the results of tests difficult to interpret. However, understanding VUSs can improve the validity of test results and be of real benefit to users.

'Interpreting the VUS that may be found on analysing the patient's genome plays an essential part in being able to provide proper counselling and if necessary, preventive or therapeutic guidance', explained Professor Martina Cornel of the European Society of Human Genetics, who was not involved in the paper, voicing her concern that data is being withheld.

'By not sharing their data on the VUS obtained from individuals undergoing BRCA1/2 testing, where Myriad is the sole commercial provider of a test in the [USA], geneticists have been unable to develop the up-to-date algorithms that are necessary to best interpret the effects of genetic variants', said added.

Professor Cook-Deegan explained that when Myriad finds a VUS it offers the patient's family members free testing in an attempt to determine that variant's significance. 'Myriad collects data regarding the clinical outcome associated with that VUS, and a VUS may ultimately be reclassified as deleterious or neutral as more is learned; conversely, deleterious or neutral mutations are occasionally reclassified as VUSs', he said.

Myriad's data on the BRCA mutation is becoming more important that its patents on the tests, says Nature News Blog. Only three percent of Myriad's tests result in a VUS, compared with 20 percent for most other BRCA1/2 tests. 'This discrepancy is at least in part to Myriad having sole possession of the information needed to interpret VUS results', said Professor Cook-Deegan.

The company stopped submitting data of its BRCA tests to public databases in 2004, claiming difficulties with matching data formats. 'Since then its contributions have essentially stopped', he said.

But Professor Cook-Deegan, a former member of the US Office of Technology Assessment, said that even if Myriad's patents are invalidated by the courts (the latest ruling in the long standing litigation was by the US Federal Circuit Court of Appeals to uphold them; reported in BioNews 669), unless the data to interpret the BRCA1/2 genetic tests are made publicly accessible, then competing test providers must either send their samples to Myriad for analysis or produce 'inadequate interpretations based upon incomplete public data and algorithms'.

'They haven't done anything illegal, they found a hole that no one else thought of and built a business model around it', he said. The paper argues that policies to encourage data sharing should be introduced to deal with the perceived problem. It suggests that databases listing genetic mutations could mandate genetic test providers to share data as a condition of listing their tests. Or that regulators, insurers or national health systems could be in a position to mandate the sharing of genetic test results.

RELATED ARTICLES FROM THE BIONEWS ARCHIVE

18 March 2013 - by Naomi Hawkins 
Patents on human genes continue to cause controversy in the academic and popular press. A recent decision in Australia has reaffirmed the patentability of isolated human DNA in that jurisdiction...
18 February 2013 - by Matthew Thomas 
A patent over a gene linked to hereditary breast and ovarian cancers is valid, an Australian federal court has ruled in a landmark case....

20 August 2012 - by Dr Sarah Spain 
In the latest instalment of a highly contested case, the US Federal Circuit Court of Appeals in Washington DC upheld Myriad Genetics' right to patent two genes, BRCA1 and BRCA2,which are associated with the risk of breast and ovarian cancer....
02 April 2012 - by Dr Sarah Spain 
The US Supreme Court has ordered that the two gene patents held by Myriad Genetics be sent back to the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, to be re-examined...
23 January 2012 - by Ayesha Ahmad 
Myriad Genetics, a leading US molecular diagnostic company, has been granted exclusive rights to an analysis of the RAD51C gene. Mutations of the gene have been associated with an increased risk for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer and the company now hopes to develop a commercial test for RAD51C....
17 September 2007 - by Ailsa Stevens 
Geneticists taking part in debate being held today at the British Society of Human Genetics (BSHG) annual conference in York will voice concerns over conflicts of interest emerging around the creation of human DNA databases. However, they will also highlight the importance of guaranteeing public confidence to...
02 April 2001 - by BioNews 
A report published by the House of Lords Science and Technology Committee strongly supports the Medical Research Council and Wellcome Trust proposal for a voluntary UK population database containing the genetic details of 500,000 men and women. To be known as the UK Population Biomedical Collection, the database will also...

HAVE YOUR SAY
Be the first to have your say.

You need to or  to add comments.

By posting a comment you agree to abide by the BioNews terms and conditions


- click here to enquire about using this story.

Published by the Progress Educational Trust

CROSSING FRONTIERS

Moving the Boundaries of Human Reproduction

Public Conference
London
8 December 2017

Speakers include

Professor Azim Surani

Professor Magdalena Zernicka-Goetz

Professor Robin Lovell-Badge

Sally Cheshire

Professor Guido Pennings

Katherine Littler

Professor Allan Pacey

Dr Sue Avery

Professor Richard Anderson

Dr Elizabeth Garner

Dr Jacques Cohen

Dr Anna Smajdor

Dr Andy Greenfield

Vivienne Parry

Dr Helen O'Neill

Dr César Palacios-González

Philippa Taylor

Fiona Fox

Sarah Norcross


BOOK HERE

Good Fundraising Code

Become a Friend of PET HERE and give the Progress Educational Trust a regular donation