Subscribe to the BioNews newsletter for free

Login
Advanced Search

Search for
BioNews


Print Page Follow BioNews on Twitter BioNews RSS feed

Like the Progress Educational Trust on Facebook



King's College London - Health: More than a medical matter





Split spare sperm samples, court tells separated lesbian couple

30 April 2012

By Antony Blackburn-Starza

Appeared in BioNews 654

Thirteen vials of sperm are to be divided between two women after their relationship ended, a Canadian court has ruled. It ruled the sperm should be treated as property and divided between the former couple as other joint assets were upon separation.

The dispute arose following the request by one of the women - known as JCM - to use the sperm to conceive with her new partner, which was refused by the other woman, known as ANA. The couple, who separated in 2006, purchased the sperm, obtained from the same donor, from a sperm bank in the USA in 1999.

Each woman used the sperm to conceive. The two resulting children now live with their respective biological mothers with each parent being allowed visiting rights to the other child. Upon separation the couple agreed to divide equally all the property in the relationship but inadvertently missed out the vials of sperm.

In 2009, JCM met a new partner and emailed ANA offering to purchase half the sperm vials, stored at the Genesis Fertility Clinic in Vancouver, to enable her to have another child who was genetically related to her existing child. JCM reportedly refused, stating her wish for the sperm to be destroyed.

Attempts to obtain further sperm samples from the donor failed. JCM had been able to contact another family who had given birth to children using sperm from that donor but was told no extra sperm vials were available. The clinic also informed JCM in 2011 the donor had 'retired' and they had no contact details.

In ordering the sperm to be divided equally, Justice Loryl Russell in the Supreme Court of British Columbia said although sperm had a different 'emotional status' to other property in divorce proceedings it should be treated as property.

'The sperm has been treated as property by everyone involved in the transaction... It has been purchased; the parties have a right to deal with it. They have made use of it to their benefit. The respondent's moral objections to the commercialisation of reproduction or the commoditisation of the body seem to me to be too late', she wrote.

The court referred to a UK Court of Appeal decision in 2009 which treated sperm as property for the purpose of claims for compensation after sperm was negligently destroyed at the storage facility, reported in BioNews 494.

'As is acknowledged in that case, typically the common law did not allow for human beings, living or deceased, or their body parts and products to be considered property... However, I agree with the [UK] Court of Appeal's finding that medical science has advanced to a point where the common law requires rethinking of this point', Justice Russell wrote.

The judge also rejected the argument that granting use of the sperm to JCM was not in the best interests of the two existing children. She concluded that such an analysis was ' not appropriate on the circumstances of the case'.

'In regard to a child who may possibly be conceived using the sperm donation jointly purchased by the parties, an analysis of the best interests of that child is, at best, speculative', said Justice Russell.

Furthermore, the judge said a recent decision in the as yet unresolved litigation brought by Olivia Pratten (reported in BioNews 645) with respect to children born of anonymous sperm donation had 'no role to play' in a dispute over gametes jointly purchased. Justice Russell also rejected the argument that the order should be determined on the basis that anonymous sperm donation is proscribed in British Columbia, refusing to rule on the legality of anonymous sperm donation, making the point that in any event the sperm had already been donated.

On how the vials should be divided, the judge said if the thirteenth vial could not be divided, seven vials would go to JCM and six to ANA. In this event, JCM is ordered to pay $125 (half of the $250 originally paid for each vial) for the extra half-vial she will receive.

 

RELATED ARTICLES FROM THE BIONEWS ARCHIVE

24 September 2012 - by Tom Barrow 
The High Court has awarded a lesbian couple sole custody rights for a child conceived using donor sperm and a surrogate's egg after a three-year battle over parenthood... [Read More]
03 September 2012 - by Victoria Burchell 
A woman has called for legal changes to prevent a man from donating his sperm without his wife's consent.... [Read More]
16 July 2012 - by Ruth Retassie 
A Californian woman is suing the US Food and Drug Administration over its sperm donation policy... [Read More]
18 June 2012 - by James Taylor 
As Britain's leading lesbian, gay and bisexual equality charity, Stonewall welcome the decision by the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence to update its fertility guidance to recognise recent changes in the law that will affect lesbian and bisexual women. The guidance, out to consultation, explicitly includes same-sex couples as an eligible group for fertility treatment... [Read More]
28 May 2012 - by Edwin Davies 
The fluidity of semen is an idea that Lisa Jean Moore returns to throughout her book 'Sperm Counts: Overcome by Man's Most Precious Fluid', though she is often less concerned with the physical qualities of the substance than she is with its fluidity as a concept... [Read More]

19 March 2012 - by Rosie Beauchamp 
The Court of Appeal in London has ruled unanimously that a gay man who fathered a child for a lesbian couple is not a secondary parent, allowing him greater access to his two-year-old son... [Read More]
13 February 2012 - by Linda Wijlaars 
The Court of Appeal in the UK is hearing a case in which a gay man is fighting for greater parental access to his two-year old son he fathered with his lesbian ex-wife... [Read More]
09 January 2012 - by Antony Blackburn-Starza 
A Florida court has granted equal parental rights to two lesbian women who created a child using the eggs from one of the women, while the other carried the baby to term. It ruled that egg donors may acquire parental rights to children resulting from their gametes under the Florida and US Constitution.... [Read More]
19 December 2011 - by Kimberley Bryon-Dodd 
A former US Republican politician has made international headlines after allegedly acting as a sperm donor to multiple women in New Zealand. According to the New Zealand Herald, Bill Johnson provided sperm to at least nine women although official guidelines state that no man should donate to more than four families.... [Read More]
22 August 2011 - by Oliver Timmis 
An Australian court has ruled that a lesbian couple can have the name of the sperm donor removed from their child's birth certificate.... [Read More]

HAVE YOUR SAY
Be the first to have your say.

You need to Login or Register to add comments.

By posting a comment you agree to abide by the BioNews terms and conditions

 


 

- click here to enquire about using this story.

Printer Friendly Page

Published by the Progress Educational Trust
RISK ASSESSMENT:
BREAST CANCER, PREDICTION AND SCREENING
FREE public event in central London, 6.30pm on Thursday 8 May 2014 - find out more HERE

ANNIVERSARY APPEAL
Please donate HERE, so that the Progress Educational Trust can continue throughout 2014 (and beyond) while keeping BioNews FREE for you to read

The Progress Educational Trust was shortlisted for the Charity Times Awards 2011

Advertise your products and services HERE - click for further details

Good Fundraising Code

Become a Friend of PET HERE, and give the Progress Educational Trust a regular donation