Subscribe to the BioNews newsletter for free

Login
Advanced Search

Search for
BioNews


Printer Friendly Page Follow BioNews on Twitter BioNews RSS feed

 

Login




News


Texan judge permits post-mortem sperm collection

14 April 2009

By Antony Blackburn-Starza

Appeared in BioNews 503

The mother of a 21-year old Texan man who died following a fight outside a bar has obtained a court ruling in her favour allowing her to collect sperm from her son's body post-mortem.

Nikolas Colton Evans died last March but although his mother had already chosen to donate his organs to the 'Texan Organ Sharing Alliance' the organisation was not able to collect his sperm. Mrs Evans told reporters that before he died he had expressed the desire to have three sons in the future, having even chosen their names - Hunter, Van and Tod. 'I want him to live on. I want to keep a piece of him,' she said.

Mrs Evans contacted lawyers after she was unable to find a urologist willing to perform the sperm collection and enlisted the help of attorney Mark Mueller who made the application on her behalf. Texan law surrounding post-mortem sperm collection is unclear, said bioethicist John Robertson at the University of Texas. 'There are no strong precedents in favour of a parent being able to request post-mortem sperm retrieval,' he said. This position has now been somewhat clarified with Probate Judge Guy Herman finding in favour of Mrs Evans after an emergency ruling in the Travis County Court last week. The application was unopposed. Whilst the ruling does not oblige any persons to harvest the sperm, it ordered the Medical Examiners Office to keep the body temperature at around 39 degrees and allow access by urologists seeking to extract the sperm. It also clarifies that the procedure is lawful thus removing any possible legal concerns of anyone undertaking the procedure. The court documents released show how the court was mindful of the 'irreparable harm' caused by failing to harvest the sperm on time, although it is unclear to whom the harm actually applies to. The sperm has now been retrieved and is available to be used in IVF procedures.

Some commentators have expressed ethical concerns over the court permitting Mrs Evans to have a 'replacement child' and any impact on the future child or children conceived after their father has died. 'This is a tough way for a kid to come into the world. As the details emerge and the child learns more about their origins, I just wonder what the impact will be,' said Tom Mayo of the Southern Methodist University. Mrs Evans is yet to select a biological mother but it is likely that the child will have no contact with her and will be brought up by Mrs Evans. She defended her position saying having children was something Nikolas had 'talked about since he was a little boy and I always dreamed about watching my children have children of their own, so it wasn't difficult to make this decision.'

 

SOURCES & REFERENCES
Statesman.com | 08 April 2009
 
chron.com | 08 April 2009
 
CBC News | 08 April 2009
 
New Scotsman | 13 April 2009
 
Associated Press | 09 April 2009
 

RELATED ARTICLES FROM THE BIONEWS ARCHIVE

08 March 2009 - by Will Fletcher 
A New York State appeals court has ruled that the parents of a man who died from cancer over a decade ago cannot use his frozen sperm to conceive a grandchild. Mark Speranza deposited his sperm in a tissue bank six months before his death in the...[Read More]
12 December 2008 - by Alan Doran 
I write in response to the articles on posthumous retrieval of gametes published in BioNews 484 and 486. The HFEA does not usually comment on the facts of individual cases. However, given the importance of the issues raised, the HFEA considers it important to clarify certain matters. The gametes which...[Read More]
01 December 2008 - by David Josiah-Lake 
As the solicitor for L, I take issue with the factual and legal inaccuracies in the Bionews article headed 'Posthumous Retrieval of Gametes: A Case of Deja vu?' It was accepted at court by all (the Government, the HFEA and ourselves) that the Blood case had not properly clarified the...[Read More]
01 December 2008 - by Dr Anna Smajdor 
To those who followed the story of Diane Blood in the '90s, the plight of the woman referred to as 'L' in recent news articles has a strong sense of deja vu (1). Once again, sperm has been obtained from the body of a man without his prior consent. Once...[Read More]
01 December 2008 - by BioNews 
In BioNews issue 484 we published a commentary on the recent 'L' decision. Since that time, we have been in communication with Diane Blood and also the solicitor acting for 'L' with respect to the article's accuracy. In the light of the comments made by these parties, we have altered...[Read More]

HAVE YOUR SAY
Be the first to have your say.

You need to Login or Register to add comments.

By posting a comment you agree to abide by the BioNews terms and conditions

 


 

- click here to enquire about using this story.


submit to reddit
Delicious delicious
Facebook

Share on Tumblr


Printer Friendly Page


BioNews Appeal: Please donate HERE to keep BioNews independent and FREE to read


The Progress Educational Trust has been shortlisted for the Charity Times Awards 2011

Good Fundraising Code


Advertise your products and services HERE - click for further details