Subscribe to the BioNews newsletter for free

Login
Advanced Search

Search for
BioNews

Like the Progress Educational Trust on Facebook




 

Event Review: Designer Athletes: Fair Play or Foul?

26 March 2012

By Luciana Strait

Appeared in BioNews 650

Designer Athletes: Fair Play or Foul?

Organised by the Physiological Society

Kia Oval, Surrey County Cricket Club, Kennington, London SE11 5SS, UK

Monday 19 March 2012

'Designer Athletes: Fair Play or Foul?', organised by the Physiological Society, Monday 19 March 2012


Consider a future world where pharmaceutical and genetic enhancements are the norm for sporting champions, where today's world records are smashed into oblivion.

The idea of 'designer athletes' may seem far-fetched but it could become a reality sooner than you think, thanks to advances in gene therapy and pharmaceutical research.

A controversial area of research, this was the focus of the debate 'Designer Athletes: Fair play or foul?', hosted by The Physiological Society in London at the Kia Oval.

I was excited as soon as I read the name 'Designer Athletes' in my inbox; it conjured up images of a sports version of the film 'Gattaca'. And it didn't disappoint - it was a thoroughly thought-provoking event.

Chaired by Ed Smith, former England cricketer and journalist, the evening started with short talks given by the panel: Dr Steve Ingham, head of physiology at the English Institute of Sport; gene doping researcher Dr Cristiana Velloso; Professor Ron Maughan, researcher into sport, exercise and health; and Dr Maria Kavussanu, an expert on morality in sport.

The discussion touched upon many controversial issues - from who is to blame for the consumption of banned substances (the coaches, the athletes?) to whether it would be more ethical to consume natural or synthetic versions of performance-enhancing substances.

But, in my opinion, it never answered the fundamental question: In a world that is inherently unfair in the opportunities it presents to athletes, why do we allow some types of performance-enhancing regimens (take high altitude training, for example) but prohibit others?

If 'fairness' is our guiding principle, why do we have a problem accepting these methods - are they not simply levelling the playing field for athletes that haven't been born into ideal genetic or socioeconomic circumstances?

And in this unfair world, is it possible to draw a line over which athletes shouldn't cross in a fair way?

With such a wide range of questions, from liability for doping, duration of bans, and fairness in sport, being well answered I was a bit let down by the way the panel tackled these more philosophically taxing questions.

I felt there was a lack of in-depth debate and an avoidance of the root of the issue. For example, when elite marathon runner Jason Maddocks asked: 'How are decisions about 'the line' made?' Professor Maughan was the only one who spoke up. 'We are all cheats', he exclaimed, thanks to food and training that can moderate gene expression.

Clearly, the difficulty they had in answering highlights the complexity of the issues - full of grey areas with no absolute answers.

But this is why I enjoyed the event: it made everyone more aware of the controversies that lie in wait, and pointed out that at this stage in the game the ethical issues of doping in sport are as clear as dishwater.

More events like 'Designer Athletes' will get people thinking and talking about doping, so if a time comes when designer athletes are a reality we'll be able to step up to the plate and 'draw the line' with clarity of thought, not just on our initial gut reactions.

SOURCES & REFERENCES

RELATED ARTICLES FROM THE BIONEWS ARCHIVE

11 August 2014 - by James Storm 
Nicholas Agar has endeared himself to the enhancement debate by being a little bit afraid of 'post humans' – the real life supermen who could very well use their powers for evil and enslave the rest of humanity. It may come as no surprise then that Agar's latest venture into the debate continues in much the same vein....

28 November 2011 - by Eleanor White 
Would you let your 10-year-old child sit out of PE classes if they were not built for sport? Would it inspire you to do better if you found out your genes indicated that you're not likely to succeed at it? Or would it demoralise you to the point that you give up on something you love?...
24 October 2011 - by Luciana Strait 
An unnamed Premier League football club has had DNA tests carried out on its players to determine which of them may be susceptible to injury. The tests were carried out by leading molecular geneticist and assistant professor at Yale University School of Medicine Dr Marios Kambouris, who was told neither the name of the club nor the identities of the players...
30 August 2011 - by Dr Nadeem Shaikh 
A South African rugby player is believed to be the first in his country to receive an experimental stem cell therapy to treat a serious neurological disease....
13 June 2011 - by Antony Blackburn-Starza 
Are athletes born or built? Basketball star Michael Jordan's son plays college-level basketball and Muhammad Ali's daughter Laila was named Super MiddleWeight women's boxing champion in 2002. Famous footballer Zinedine Zidane's son Enzo, joined by his siblings Luca and Theo, are all promising young footballers among the Real Madrid cadets...
31 May 2011 - by Dr Jay Stone 
A US company has launched a mail order genetic test that claims to provide 'athletes and parents of young sports competitors' with information about the user's athletic strengths, what type of training will be most beneficial, and potential injury risks...

HAVE YOUR SAY
Be the first to have your say.

You need to or  to add comments.

By posting a comment you agree to abide by the BioNews terms and conditions


- click here to enquire about using this story.

Published by the Progress Educational Trust
Advertise your products and services HERE - click for further details

Good Fundraising Code

Become a Friend of PET HERE and give the Progress Educational Trust a regular donation